1 of 2
Worldview: The History of a Concept
By David K. Naugle
Eerdmans
384 pp.; $26, paper
For many readers of Books & Culture and Christianity Today, to deploy the phrase "Christian worldview" in conversation nowadays is to risk uttering a banality. The development of the "evangelical mind," particularly as it is manifest in the "faith and learning" industry in Christian higher education, is inconceivable without the conceptual framework of worldview thinking.
But the American zeal for practicality, quick answers, and efficient techniques has reduced this robust concept to "resources" for giving "The Christian Response" to various contemporary issues, from cloning to prayer in public schools to liberal media bias—and, of course, ways to make your local college biology teacher look silly. All of this has conspired to persuade more than a few philosophers and theologians in the Christian community that "worldview" as an analytical tool has outlived its usefulness.
Not so fast, says David Naugle. His comprehensive book, Worldview: The History of a Concept, is a heroic attempt to revive worldview thinking. Naugle's study offers an in-depth historical survey of this important but complex and often misunderstood concept. Despite its abuses, he argues, worldview thinking should not be dismissed. What is needed is a new view of worldview—and Naugle's sophisticated account of its origins, development, and use will no doubt reinvigorate a concept that has too often been mobilized to shut down, rather than open up, discussion.
As a curator of a university art museum and historian of modern art, I have come to see most Christian worldview discourse on art as unproductive at best. Naugle's nuanced and self-critical exploration of the concept has rekindled my own interest in its potential explanatory power as it relates to the interpretation of modern and contemporary art.
But my involvement in things worldviewish is not limited to my professional work as a curator and scholar. I am also serving on the board of my kids' Christian school, and one of its strategic goals is to deepen and expand the Christian worldview throughout its curriculum and programs. And this is precisely why worldview thinking is so important for Christians, who recognize that ideas have tremendous consequences not only for academics but also for parents and teachers of young children.
Naugle's book combines scholarly acumen with a pastor's heart. He's convinced that the church needs worldview thinking to help "believers understand the cosmic dimension and all-encompassing implications of biblical revelation." As a one-person philosophy department at a Baptist university, he is committed to bringing an intellectually robust Christianity to his students, many of whom no doubt view faith as a private spiritual matter.
captionhough the book is written from an evangelical Reformed perspective, the story Naugle tells reveals in no uncertain terms that worldview thinking is neither the invention of American evangelicals nor even the exclusive domain of Christian thinking. With his expansive, textured view of worldview discourse as it weaves its way through diverse Christian theological and Western philosophical traditions, Naugle shows that it is just as important to explore Kant's and Wittgenstein's understanding of worldview as it is to study Abraham Kuyper's or Francis Schaeffer's.
Naugle begins his study by comparing and contrasting Protestant, Roman Catholic, and Eastern Orthodox worldview perspectives. He plumbs the depths of the concept's origins in Kant's idealist philosophical system, surveying its use by philosophers in the 19th and 20th century. He then explores its disciplinary applications in the natural sciences, philosophy of science, psychology, sociology, and cultural anthropology. After this historical survey, Naugle circles back and approaches the concept from theological and philosophical perspectives. He concludes with a brief discussion of the dangers of worldview analysis, a synopsis of evangelical worldview contributions, and a useful bibliography.
share this page
RSS Feed
