Back to Christian History & Biography
Member Login:    


My Account | About Us | Forgot password?

 

CH Blog | This Week in Christian History | Ask the Expert | CH Store
 

Related Channels
Christianity Today magazine
Books & Culture





Christian History Home > Ask The Expert > When was it decided that a pope should take a new name?


When was it decided that a pope should take a new name?
Elesha Coffman | posted 8/08/2008 11:33AM



ADVERTISEMENT

When was it decided that a pope should take a new name?

—Mike

Here's what I found in The Oxford Dictionary of Popes by J.N.D. Kelly. The first pope to take a new name was John II in 533. His given name was Mercury, the name of a pagan god and hardly suitable for a pope, so he adopted the name of the martyred John I instead.

There wasn't another papal name change until John XII (originally Octavian) in 955. Name changes became common after that, but not every pope took a new name. Several eleventh-century Johns kept the name John, for example.

It's possible that some very early popes took different names. We know almost nothing about many of the popes (then called bishops of Rome) who served during the church's first centuries, so tidbits like given names could easily have been lost.

To ask CHB editors a church history-related question, send an e-mail to cheditor@christianitytoday.com. Due to the volume of mail, we cannot answer all questions. Your question may be answered in a future "Ask the Editors" column. Do not expect a direct reply.

share this pageshare this page




Browse More ChristianHistory.net
Home  |  Browse by Topic  |  Browse by Period  |  The Past in the Present  |  Books & Resources

   RSS Feed   RSS Help








share this pageshare this page













ChristianityToday.com
Christianity Today International
www.ChristianityToday.com
Copyright © Christianity Today International
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact Us | Advertise with Us | Job Openings