Weblog: When It Comes to Influencing the Media Money Talks
Plus: Inside the Southern Baptist Convention, and the New York Times on teaching evolution as theory.
Compiled by Ted Olsen | posted 6/8/00 | posted 6/01/2000 12:00AM
Advertisers more successful than watchdogs at pressuring mediaThe Family Friendly Programming Forum, a group of advertisers led by Johnson & Johnson and Procter & Gamble, is changing television in a way Donald Wildmon's American Family Association never could, reports Inside.com. Because of the group, CBS is airing more family-oriented movies and a family award show. And this fall, the WB will air Gilmore Girls, a show the group commissioned."The purpose of this is to try to affect the networks that have the mass audience viewing in 98 percent of the homes and generate a potentially big rating," says Bill Cella, a Family Friendly Programming Forum board member."Family programming has become family networks, like Fox Family and Pax. But if you want to stand out in a crowd and you want to be pronounced you want to have it on a network where there isn't a lot of family programming."
Moderate Southern Baptists"a denomination within the denomination"As the Southern Baptist Convention gears up for its annual meeting next week in Orlando, Florida, New York Times religion reporter Gustav Niebuhr looks at what appears to be a growing fragmentation in the denomination. But if it's fragmenting, don't look for it to break up. Paige Patterson, president of the Southern Baptist Convention, tells The New York Times that 1,500 or more of the SBC's 40,000 congregations might leave the convention in the coming years, but that they wouldn't be missed: the SBC planted 1,479 new churches last year and attracted newcomers like Jerry Falwell's Thomas Road Baptist Church.
Teach evolution as theory, not fact, says New York Times columnistIn the Times's"Lessons" column, Richard Rothstein writes,"We should adopt the creationists' approach [to teach evolution as theory, not fact]. Indeed, if we dismiss claims that evolution is only theory, it shows how poorly we learned science in school." Rothstein believes that evolution is the simplest explanation of the evidence."Adults do not need to know details about evolution, like whether Australopithecus preceded Homo habilis. But with good science education, all would appreciate that evolutionary theory is based on gathering evidence, recording, categorizing and summarizing data."
Related ElsewhereSee our past Weblogs:
June
7 |
6 |
5
June
2 |
1 | May
30
May
26 |
25 |
24 |
23 |
22
May
19 |
18 |
17 |
16 |
15
May
12 |
11 |
10 |
9 |
8
May
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1
April
28 |
27 |
26 |
25 |
24
Copyright © 2004 Christianity Today.
Click
for reprint information.
1 of 1
June (Web-only) 2000, Vol. 44
E-mail
Print
Post
Subscribe to Christianity Today magazine today!
