Editorial: Thus Spoke Superman
Troubling language frames the stem-cell debate
A Christianity Today Editorial | posted 6/12/2000 12:00AM

2 of 2

Related Elsewhere
Various opinions on human stem cell research can be found at
Lutherans for Life, the
Juvenile Diabetes Foundation,
Focus on the Family,
Discover,
National Review,
Technology Review, the
Foundation for Biomedical Research, the
Coalition of Americans for Research Ethics, and the
Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.The
National Institutes of Health Web site offers an area on stem-cell research that includes the controversial research guidelines and a primer on
"what stem cells are; what pluripotent stem cells are; how pluripotent stem cells are derived; why pluripotent stem cells are important to science; why they hold such great promise for advances in health care; and what adult stem cells are."
The American Association for the Advancement of Science has also addressed the issue of human stem cell research.The Web site for Trinity's
Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity includes several areas on stem-cell research and a daily bioethics Weblog. Last year, The New York Times looked at the
religious aspects of the debate over human stem cell research.
Christopher Reeve discussed the possible benefits of stem cells for spinal cord injuries on Good Morning America. The
Christopher Reeve Paralysis Foundation is also online.See our past coverage of this issue:New Stem-Cell Research Guidelines Criticized
| NIH guidelines skirt ethical issues about embryo destruction, charge bioethicists (Feb. 7, 2000)
Human Embryo Research Resisted (August 9, 1999)
Embryo Research Contested (May 24, 1999)
Editorial: The Biotech Temptation | Research on human embryos holds great promise, but at what price? (July 12, 1999)
Copyright © 2004 Christianity Today. Click
for reprint information.