2 of 4

What's New
Although Warner Bros. delayed the release of Red Planet in order to distance itself from last spring's Mission to Mars, audiences still seemed to have had their fill of Mars thrillers, as the $80 million film opened to a mere $8.7 million. However, several Christian critics appreciated this film more than its predecessor since it features discussions about God's role in the universe rather than positing Martians as givers of life. Movieguide says "Red Planet is an intense, well-produced science fiction movie that casts doubts about the ability of atheism to sustain man and prolong the future. Although it ultimately leaves the existence and workings of God a mystery, two of the movie's three most positive characters embrace the idea as a distinct possibility. This is unique for a genre that hasn't always been friendly toward those who believe in some form of theism." John Evans of Preview agrees, explaining that "one older astronaut says that science does not have answers to many 'interesting' questions of life and he is diligently searching for God. Another argues that believing in God ignores practical facts and is the 'easy' way out. Even Gallagher, a confirmed skeptic, observes that God moves in mysterious ways." But other Christian critics interpreted these conversations differently. Focus on the Family's Tony Powell and Steven Isaac say, "Even though isolated scenes in Red Planet toy with the idea that God 'might' have the power to work wonders, the script turns around to discredit Him by consistently placing science above Him." The Childcare Action Project also questions the film's openness to God, saying that "while faith in God is mentioned in a positive way at least twice, a more bold and 'finalizing' comment was 'You see God, you let me know. Until then I'll trust my Ph.D.s.'" Other Christians dismissed the film for its plot and its acting. "Considering the story—these are the first humans to set foot on Mars, and their mission's success determines the future of mankind—the acting and direction seem flat and unemotional," says Doug Phillips, guest reviewer for Christian Spotlight. "Just once, I'd like to see a scientifically accurate film—a lifeless Mars instead of a lifeless crew." Movie Reporter Phil Boatwright asks, "Have you noticed that in several of his films, actor Val Kilmer looks like he'd rather be someplace else? ... I can understand why. The script is not just routine, it's downright dull. No lesson is learned. There's little insight. Even the mindless action disappoints."

next page... |  2 of 4

share this page

November (Web-only) 2000, Vol. 44