Related articles and links |  1 of 3

UMC Judicial Council: Investigative committee made "egregious error"
The United Methodist Church's Judicial Council, the church's supreme court, sent a case against an openly homosexual minister back to a lower church court, saying an "egregious error" was made in refusing to bring charges against her. The church's Book of Discipline clearly forbids churches from appointing ministers who are "self-avowed, practicing homosexuals."

"Where the agreed facts concede a practice which the Discipline declares to be incompatible with Christian teaching, reasonable grounds exist to bring a bill of charges and specifications, and it is an egregious error of church law not to bring such a bill of charges and specifications," the council said.

The case against Karen Dammann is one of a two such cases involving the same church. The other, over gay minister Mark Williams, was dismissed last year when the investigative committee found "insufficient evidence" for charges.

The Washington Post rightly notes that the case "is testing the 'don't ask, don't tell' policy toward gay clergy in the Methodist Church." Would that the denomination's own news service took as balanced a perspective as the Post. Instead, it casts the case as persecution over disclosure, with the headline, "Clergywoman accepts 'cost of being truthful' about sexuality."

Yeah, that's what orthodox Methodists have a problem with: Dammann's honesty.

New York Times notices evangelicals' human rights work. Again. Late. Again.
Weblog isn't complaining about the front page of Sunday's New York Times, which carried the headline "Evangelicals Sway White House on Human Rights Issues Abroad." The article was fair and accurate, and probably informed a lot of readers that evangelical politics isn't all about restoring the Ten Commandments to courthouses.

Well, Times readers who never read Times columnist Nicholas Kristof's May 2002 column, "The New Internationalists." Both pieces made the same point: evangelicals have been leading the charge against a variety of social ills. Among the most recent campaigns noted by the Times are those for peace in Sudan, religious liberty in all countries, freedom from sexual slavery, and AIDS in Africa.

It's good to note, but it's not really all that new, contrary to this sentence: "The religious dynamic at the White House reflects a larger change within American evangelicals themselves, and their interest over the last decade in moving beyond the divisive domestic issues that consumed them a generation ago — abortion, school prayer, homosexuality, pornography — into an international arena."

Actually, evangelicals have been very interested in international human rights for centuries—or, depending on your historical perspective, millennia. As former U.S. ambassador Robert Seiple said back in 2002, "Christians began to understand globalization when a Nazareth carpenter said, 'Go ye into all the world.' That was the start of globalization, and there has been no letup in the last 2,000 years."

As far as American politics is concerned, Institute for the Study of American Evangelicals director Edith Blumhofer said in 2002, American evangelicals have been characterized by their interest in influencing international politics "at least since American foreign policy went international, and probably even before."

And a generation ago, evangelicals were extremely involved in international human rights. Only then there was a united major threat against human freedom: communism. One of the major reasons Billy Graham founded this magazine, in fact, was to help the church to fight communism.

next page... |  1 of 3

October (Web-only) 2003, Vol. 47