3 of 3

• The lessons of Roe | Thirty years of learning. (Frederica Mathewes-Green, National Review Online)
  
  
• Marching onward | Prolifers save lives (John J. Miller, National Review Online)
  
  
• Jefferson and Roe v. Wade | Could it be that one of America's most pre-eminent Founding Fathers, Thomas Jefferson, is also the "founding father" of the Right to Life Movement? (Edward Smith, The Washington Times)
  
  
• Shaky basis for a Constitutional 'right' | For years now, there has been a serious disconnection between the popular perception of Roe and its standing among constitutional law scholars (Kermit Roosevelt, The Washington Post)
  
  
• Roe v. Wade still safe at 30 | Prochoicers fail to acknowledge their victories (David J. Garrow, Chicago Tribune)
  
  
• Resurgence in war on Roe | Mainstream Americans did not invite, and are poorly served by, a new round of polarizing attacks on abortion (Editorial, Los Angeles Times)
  
  
• 30 years after Roe v. Wade | Real leaders do not wait for cultural change, they initiate it (Teresa R. Wagner, The Washington Times)
• For the millions who missed their birthday | While researchers try to figure out why abortion rates are dropping and pundits try to spin why Americans favor protecting the unborn, I'd like to take a stab at the answer: education and technology (Kathleen Parker, Chicago Tribune)
  
  
• Bitter abortion rhetoric only marginalizes the extremists | For all of the protests launched, votes cast, lawsuits mounted and violence committed over the highly charged issue, Americans' views have barely changed after three decades (Editorial, USA Today)
  
  
• Spending is justified | What most people really want is to prevent the vast majority of abortions. (David O'Steen, USA Today)
  
  
• The thirty years war (pt. 1) | To be against abortion is not to be against feminism (Norah Vincent, Los Angeles Times)
  
  
• The thirty years war (pt. 2) |  Roe, now in serious danger, must be made stronger (Jonathan Turley, Los Angeles Times)
  
  
• Should Roe v. Wade be overturned? | Yes: It's time to awaken from a 30-year nightmare (Tom Neven, The Denver Post)
  
  
• Should Roe v. Wade be overturned? | No: This generation must carry torch of freedom  (Beth Ganz, The Denver Post)
  
  

Other abortion articles:

• Senate omnibus spending bill missing provisions to limit abortion funds | One of the provisions prohibits covering abortions in the federal employee health benefits program, the second is a ban on providing abortions in the federal Bureau of Prisons (The Washington Times)
  
  
• Bill seeks stiffer rules for abortion clinics in Va. | Resuscitating tools, nurses requested (The Washington Post)
  
  
• An abortion doctor's view | In Wisconsin, consent laws are followed with a wink (The New York Times)
  
  
• Courts put girls on the stand in Alabama | Teenage girls in Alabama who want an abortion without a parent's permission must go to juvenile court first, to get permission from a judge (The New York Times)
  
  

Copyright © 2003 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Suggest links and stories by sending e-mail to weblog@christianitytoday.com

What is Weblog?

See our past Weblog updates:

January 21 | 20

January 17 | 16 | 15 | 14 | 13

January 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6

January 3 | 2 | December 31 | 30

December 27 | 26

December 19 | 18 | 17 | 16

December 13 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9

December 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2

first page |  3 of 3

share this page

January (Web-only) 2003, Vol. 47