Related articles and links |  1 of 2

Inside CT

This issue was edited before the U.S. elections, and I am writing as anti-Bush op-ed writers bemoan the loss of secularist America, an America that didn't really exist. A Village Voice columnist wails that the voters had given President Bush a mandate for theocracy. And historian Garry Wills calls November 2 "the day the Enlightenment went out."

Why were these pundits so surprised by the strength of the "values vote"? Opinion polls had long pointed to the growing strength of moral conservatism. And Wills's apoplexy over the end of the Enlightenment comes many years after postmodern academics conducted the Enlightenment's funeral.

It seems their real worry is that the President will actually listen to the values voters. As Wills said, the constituency to which President Bush owes his victory "is not a yielding one. He must give them what they want."

Pro-life, pro-family voters must be more realistic than Wills. The next four years will not be a cakewalk for the pro-life, pro-family cause. Nothing that happened on November 2 prevents sitting judges from deciding the people have this one wrong. The work of conservative public-interest law firms continues to be crucial.

The values voters must not only be persuasive, but we must be known for our breadth and winsomeness. It is important that we fight the stereotype of scientifically backward killjoys focused narrowly on personal morality. It is our love for humanity that drives us to fight the normalization of homosexuality, the sexual trafficking of women and children, the tyranny of Kim Jong Il, and the destruction of human life in questionable medical research.

Evangelicals must be careful not to overreach. The values voters turned out in such numbers because the progressive forces overreached in their energetic push for gay marriage just months before the election. Moral conservatives must avoid the same mistake. Our burden is to be as persuasive and winsome in talking about moral issues as we are when we want to win someone for Jesus.

Finally, while elections can be galvanized by alarming events, the ongoing work of governance requires a well-thought-through philosophy. In October, the board of the National Association of Evangelicals formally approved a document that is to serve as its framework for public engagement, and one that it hopes will help many churches and organizations serve the cause of biblical Christianity in the public square. Read "For the Health of the Nation" for yourself. It is available on the internet, both on the NAE website (www.nae.net) and the Christianity Today website (www.christianitytoday.com/go/naestatement).

You will find there the biblical and theological reasons for civic engagement, reflection on the mode and manner of involvement, and a broad understanding of the areas we are called to affect, protect, or nurture: human rights, religious liberty and freedom of conscience, family life and children, the sanctity of human life, justice and compassion for the poor and vulnerable, peacemaking, and stewardship of creation. Under these headings come more specific issues: race relations, immigration, health care, job training, and cloning and embryonic stem-cell research, to name just a few. Now that the noisy election is over, the quiet and complex work of implementing a caring Christian vision must not be neglected.

Next Issue: When fraud takes advantage of faith; why we can't live without church; and ministry to the children of Mongolia.

Copyright © 2004 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

next page... |  1 of 2

December 2004, Vol. 48, No. 12