Separation of Ministry and Politics
In order to influence public policy successfully, Focus on the Family must quickly learn how to remove politicking from its ministry core.
By Rob Moll | posted 7/01/2004 12:00AM
Before this week's Senate vote on the Federal Marriage Amendment, churches all over the country watched Focus on the Family President James Dobson urge congregants to call their Senators. Focus on the Family, however is limited by Internal Revenue Service restrictions from advocating too heavily for the amendment. Focus spends less than 0.2 percent of its total contributions on political activities. That amount has not done the job, and when Dobson spoke last weekend, he did so as the head of Focus on the Family Action, an organization under IRS rules that allows political activities.
"[T]he attack and assault on marriage is so distressing that I just feel like I can't remain silent," Focus president James Dobson toldThe New York Times. In response, Focus is currently going through the difficult process of shifting its political activities, ramping up those efforts, and incorporating them into Focus on the Family Action, a nonprofit that is free to lobby and participate in political campaigns.
Dobson wrote in a July 2004 Action Newsletter, "The primary difference between the two ministries is that FOF can provide a tax deduction for its contributors but is extremely limited in its ability to lobby for its core principles. By contrast, Focus Action can devote every dollar contributed to defend what we believe, but cannot offer a tax-deduction for the money donated."
Peter Brandt, director of issues response, at Focus on the Family Action says that as the culture becomes more hostile to Christian values, "It's going to become increasingly important to make that distinction between what Focus does in the area of redemptive ministry and helpful ministry and what Focus [Action] does in the political realm."
Distinction isn't so clear
Though creating Focus on the Family Action may be a straightforward matter of a legal incorporation under IRS code 501(c)4 instead of 501(c)3, it is not merely a matter of forming a new organization. "There's no simple way to describe who's what," said Brandt. "Those of us who tended to be involved in policy before are spending a greater proportion of our time on Focus on the Family Action."
But there are no new offices, no separate buildings, and no unique support staff. In the office, sitting next to a Focus on the Family fax machine is another one for Focus on the Family Action. "People on my staff keep track of, in tenth of an hour blocks, the time that they are spending doing these various things," Brandt said.
Focus on the Family Action pays its employees for all their work, then bill Focus on the Family for the work employees do for it, which may be a majority of their time. "There are some folks who are spending all of their time, or a large proportion of their time, on Focus on the Family Action, and there are some people who are spending only a small amount of their time on Focus on the Family Action activities." Support staff, such as in human resources and purchasing departments, also do work for both organizations. Focus personnel said other issues, such as employee benefits and member list rentals, are in compliance with IRS regulations, though they declined to give details.
"There are 10 or 15 Focus on the Family Action projects that have been approved within the ministry. So only those employees who are [Action] employees are allowed to work on those projects," Brandt said. By keeping track of time employees spend on different projects, Focus on the Family Action pays a proportionate amount of wages and overhead, including rent. Focus on the Family has so far declined to comment on how the relationship affects member list rental or employee benefits.
July (Web-only) 2004, Vol. 48