Gender Is No Disease
Our children's sex is not something to be screened but gratefully received.
A Christianity Today editorial | posted 1/25/2005 12:00AM

2 of 2

Copyright © 2005 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.
Related Elsewhere:
In "A Boy for You, a Girl for Me: Technology Allows Choice," The Washington Post looked at parents who wanted to chose the gender of their children.
CBS News and Newsweek also looked at the issue.
H. Bentley Glass, the geneticist who said, "No parents will in that future time have a right to burden society with a malformed or a mentally incompetent child," died recently.
The President's Council on Bioethics prepared a preliminary paper before its full discussion of sex selection.
China banned abortion for sex selection purposes.
The Christian Medical & Dental Associations has provided ethics statements on reproductive technologies on its website.
Other recent Christianity Today articles on Life Ethics includes:
Bitter Pill | FDA strengthens warning on RU-486. (Jan. 24, 2005)
Post-Election Education | Pro-lifers weigh options after Californians fund embryonic stem-cell research. (Dec. 01, 2004)
It's Not About Stem Cells | Why we must clarify the debate over harvesting embryos. (Sept. 29, 2004)
California's Prop. 71 Stem-Cell 'Scam' | Supporters of cloning embryos for research have $11 million to convince state voters. (Sept. 29, 2004)
Pro-Abortion Madness | The abortion lobby has abandoned its rationales amid pro-life gains. (Aug. 17, 2004)
The Proposition 71 Stem Cell Scam | The biotech lobby is attempting to buy a law in California, Wesley J. Smith says. (Aug. 17, 2004)
Speaking Out: Life with Dignity | Let's not be too eager to pull the plug on our fellow image-bearers. (Aug. 13, 2004)
Unwanted Interruptions | Why is our culture so hostile to children-inside and outside the womb? (June 22, 2004)
When Does Personhood Begin? | And what difference does it make? (June 18, 2004)