Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
November 26, 2009
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > 2005 > September (Web-only)Christianity Today, September (Web-only), 2005  |   |  
The Stem-Cell Conspiracy
The Washington Post muddles a major breakthrough in adult stem-cell research, while the U.K. marches blindly on.




ADVERTISEMENT

Scores of editorials and news pages continue to follow the saga of "the Bush ban on stem-cell research." It's amazing how badly this gets the story wrong.

Stem-cell research is forging ahead, and funded by the feds. "Adult" stem-cell research, using these amazingly versatile cells taken harmlessly from cord blood and adults, is leading to cures in dozens of clinical trials—funded by the federal government.

And there is no embryo research "ban." There isn't even a "ban" on funding. In fact, President Bush is the first President ever to use federal funds for research on embryos.

To get the inside story on the "secret" stem cell debate, check out StemCellResearch.org.

What we can learn from Europe


There are some more bad news stories from the U.K. this week, and we can be thankful (in a rather perverse way) that a nation with which we have so much in common is eager to teach us what the future may hold—if we follow in its footsteps. Brave New Britain continues to lead the way.

Taking a further step in the use of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to ensure "quality control" of embryos, the U.K. has now approved the use of genetic testing to enable a couple to have a child free of retinoblastoma.

As The Scotsman newspaper points out, "The decision breaks new ethical ground in the debate on 'designer babies,' because retinoblastoma is rarely fatal. Treatment is successful in 95 percent of cases and not all of those with the defective gene develop the disease." Dr. Calum McKellar of the Scottish Council for Human Bioethics says that because of this decision, "the floodgates for using PGD for all sorts of disorders or limitations may be open, even selecting out embryos who do not have the musical genes. Where do we stop?"

But Europe offers us illustrations at both ends of the spectrum. The U.K.'s increasingly liberal approach could hardly be more different from that in Germany, where it is illegal to create an embryo unless it will be implanted.


Related Elsewhere:

Previous Life Matters columns include:

Brave New Puppy | Introducing our new life ethics weblog. (Aug. 10, 2005)
Britain Leads the (Wrong) Way | Embryos to be screened for cancer risk, "danger genes." (Aug. 17, 2005)

More CT articles on bioethics are available on our Life Ethics page.

share this pageshare this page



E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: Not rated

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search






















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com