Related articles and links |  1 of 2

Kentucky's state school board has apparently resolved a spat over historical date references in social studies classes, but not before the state's governor, facing an uphill re-election bid, seized on the issue.

And while the immediate controversy over the use of B.C. (Before Christ) and A.D. (Anno Domini, Latin for "in the year of the Lord") may have subsided, related fights over the proper role of religion in public schools appear to be far from settled.

Earlier this year, staff at the Kentucky Department of Education proposed substituting C.E. (Common Era) for A.D. and B.C.E. (Before the Common Era) for B.C. in draft curriculum guidelines for high school and middle school social studies classes.

The common B.C./A.D. system is based on the supposed year of Christ's birth — a date posited by the monk Dionysius Exiguus in the year 525. Years after Christ's birth go up; those before it are counted backwards.

The proposal quickly came under attack from a conservative group, the Family Foundation of Kentucky, which accused state officials of trying to strip religious references from the state's public schools.

In April, the statewide education board restored A.D. and B.C. to the guidelines, but only after including both systems — B.C./B.C.E. and A.D./C.E. The school board is expected to take final action in June on the voluntary guidelines, which spell out key concepts students are expected to master in all grades and subjects.

The spat is reminiscent of fights over religion in public schools that have flared in other states, most often over the teaching of "intelligent design" in science courses.

Republican Gov. Ernie Fletcher, speaking at a bill-signing ceremony for a measure authorizing the installation of a Ten Commandments monument on the state Capitol grounds, said he opposed dropping A.D. and B.C. in schools.

Two days later, the Kentucky Senate unanimously voted to require public schools to use A.D. and B.C. The bill died after the House failed to act before the legislative session ended April 12.

Martin Cothran, senior policy analyst for the Family Foundation, accused school officials of trying to "religiously sterilize the teaching of history in our schools."

But Lisa Gross, spokeswoman for the state school board, said the aim was merely to familiarize students with nomenclature they may encounter on college-entry tests and in their reading and further education.

Schools are free to depart from the guidelines, she said. "There's no desire at the state level to meddle in the local authority of schools on this issue or any other," she said.

The Rev. Nancy Jo Kemper, executive director of the Kentucky Council of Churches, said schools should teach students the meaning of C.E. and B.C.E. "simply because it increasingly is the language and the abbreviation used in the secular world and in academic circles, and our young people need to be acquainted with that."

But branding such instruction an assault on Christianity "is to my mind absurd," said Kemper, an ordained minister in the United Church of Christ and the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ).

Gross said until the Family Foundation fired its broadside, only one of the hundreds of public comments the department received on the document had criticized it for using the secular dating system, she said.

"It was one of those issues that exploded and was very hot for a brief period of time, and it's calmed down considerably," Gross said.

Gilbert T. Sewall, director of the American Textbook Council, an independent research center that reviews history and social studies texts, said California recently adopted many textbooks that use the secular dating system. He looks askance at that trend.

next page... |  1 of 2

May (Web-only) 2006, Vol. 50