Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
November 22, 2009
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > 2007 > December (Web-only)Christianity Today, December (Web-only), 2007  |   |  
CT Classic
Let the Pagans Have the Holiday
First, let's take back Easter.



ADVERTISEMENT

This article was originally published in the December 13, 1993 issue of Christianity Today.

It is time to recognize that a new tradition has been added to Christmas. As surely as trees and lights and reindeer, December now brings Christian complaints about the secularization of the holiday. T-shirts and posters and preachers declare, "Jesus Is the Reason for the Season," but their protests are drowned in the commercial deluge.

Christmas is ruled not from Jerusalem or Rome or Wheaton or any other religious center, but from Madison Avenue and Wall Street. In a revealing symbolic act, President George [H.W.] Bush two years ago inaugurated the season not, mind you, in a church, but in a shopping mall. There he bought some socks and reminded Americans their true Christmas responsibility is not veneration but consumption.

To some, Christmas also seems less Christian because many of the nation's institutions are less and less willing to prop up the church. So some disgruntled believers—misguidedly, by my estimate—do battle with various courthouses that no longer allow crèches on their lawns.

Sometimes outsiders glimpse our own dilemma more acutely than we can. Last Christmas, Rabbi Lawrence Hoffman wrote an article in Cross Currents entitled, "Being a Jew at Christmas Time." In it he observed, "There is nothing wrong with sleigh bells, Bing Crosby, and Christmas pudding, but I should hope Christians would want more than just that, and as Christmas becomes more and more secularized, I am not sure they get it." He went on: "In the end, the problem of Christmas is not mine any more than Christmas itself is. The real Christmas challenge belongs to Christians: how to take Christmas out of the secularized public domain and move it back into the religious sphere once again."

The rabbi is right on both counts. For Christians, Christmas definitely loses something—in fact, loses its core—as it gets more and more secular. But the solution is not to worry over courthouse crèches: The real Christmas challenge belongs to Christians. The church and not city hall is charged with witnessing to the gospel and remembering to the world the birth of Jesus Christ.

Seasonal humbug

Here I want to suggest that Christians may best reclaim Christmas, indirectly, by first reclaiming Easter. Ours is an ironic faith, one that trains its adherents to see strength in weakness. The irony at hand could be that a secularizing culture has shown us something important by devaluing Christmas. In a way, Christians have valued Christmas too much and in the wrong way. I defer again to Hoffman, who writes,

Historians tell us that Christmas was not always the cultural fulcrum that balances Christian life. There was a time when Christians knew that the paschal mystery of death and resurrection was the center of Christian faith. It was Easter that really mattered, not Christmas. Only in the consumer-conscious nineteenth century did Christmas overtake Easter, becoming the centerpiece of popular piety. Madison Avenue marketed the change, and then colluded with the entertainment industry to boost Christmas to its current calendrical prominence.

The Bible, of course, knows nothing of the designated holidays we call Easter or Christmas. But each holiday celebrates particular events, and there can be no doubt which set of events receives the most scriptural emphasis.

It is well known that all four Gospels build toward and focus on the events leading up to and including what we commemorate at Easter. One-quarter to one-half the chapters in each of the four Gospels deal with Easter events. Clearly, the gospel traditions see these as the crucial episodes, the events that identify and ratify Jesus as God's Messiah, In fact, two of the four Gospels (Mark and John) have no birth, or Christmas, narratives. This means certain of the earliest Christian communities knew no Christmas (at least, not from their basic texts). To put it another way, we could be Christians without the stories of Christmas, but not without the stories of Easter.

share this pageshare this page



E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 11 comments.See all comments
Ephrem Hagos   Posted: December 19, 2007 1:53 AM
WHAT AN UNHOLY CHOICE: CHRISTMAS OR EASTER FOR FIRST PLACE AS HOLIDAY! However much one searches the Scriptures, there is no promise whatsoever of the real and abiding presence of Jesus Christ in either of them. Guided by the teachings of Jesus (largely in short supply today) and the witness of the Apostles, the time of the observance of the resurrection among early Jewish Christians was necessarily determined by the date of the Passover festival, i.e., the Good Friday. According to the ISB Encyclopedia, Gentile (Pagan) Christians, however, came and moved the celebration of the Resurrection to Sunday irrespective of the mismatch with "being raised to life on the third day" --a red herring device used by our Lord to make more secure His order to His disciples not to tell anyone that His Messiahship will be publicly revealed on the the very day of the Passover. And so it was! If we only knew how much we, Christians, are missing! How much more can God help us?

John B   Posted: December 13, 2007 3:02 PM
It all comes down to Facts my friends...we can stomp our feet and claim all kinds of crazy stuff...bu the TRUTH will always be the TRUTH....and that is: On the 24th of December the world will still celebrate the birth of our LORD JESUS...who loves ALL not just the chosen ones...as we are told by other fake religions...that single out and discriminate....We are ALL children of GOD is what TRUE ROMAN CATHOLICS believe....and all can join...so take a chance this CHRISTMAS and go to a CATHOLIC church and join us....you will be pleasantly surprised.....with LOVE and JOY! TRUTH: although many around the world claim not to believe in CHRIST.....funny how our calendar runs on the BIRTH of CHRIST ---- 2008 years of his BIRTH ( BC - stands for Birth of Christ) OUR LORD and ONLY OUR LORD is the ruler......humble yourself to HIM - HE ADORES YOU!

Andreas   Posted: December 13, 2007 11:43 AM
What a pointless article. Thank you Thordasi for bringing up your points. My roommate is Pagan, and he's probably the most moral person I know--much more so than me lol! Furthermore, if you really want to get at the heart of it, paganism, broadly defined, is any community-ideology-system that does not have Abrahamic roots (non Christians, Jews, and Muslims). Therefore, India is the largest pagan society, and I'm not a scholar of India by any means, but I don't think many Indians celebrate Christmas!

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search






















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com