Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
May 13, 2008
Free E-mail Newsletters:
RSS Feed | More Feeds | RSS Help

Home > 2007 > JulyChristianity Today, July, 2007  |   |  
Tidings
The Quest for the Historical Jerry
You can tell a lot about someone by what he says about Falwell.



ADVERTISEMENT

The penultimate item in U.S. News & World Report's list of "10 Things You Didn't Know About Jerry Falwell" explained that "Falwell had been controversial throughout the years." The article then quoted his "I point the finger in their face" remarks, made on The 700 Club two days after the September 11 attacks.



Some rightly bemoaned that this was the only thing people did know about Falwell—except perhaps for his supposed "outing" of Tinky Winky the Teletubby. Conservatives rued how the "liberal media" treated Falwell. Focus on the Family headlines included "Media Warped Young Conservatives' Views of Falwell" and "Assassinating the Dead." Then again, liberals said his frequent television appearances evinced a conservative bias in the media. Religion journalist-turned-academic Gustav Niebuhr said Falwell gained media prominence largely because he "returned reporters' phone calls ahead of deadline, sat through countless interviews, and was always blunt, succinct, and consistent— thus, eminently quotable."

Blunt and succinct, yes, but without nuance, and consistency was a problem. The Falwell who spoke of Christians' political duty also said, "Preachers are not called to be politicians, but to be soul winners." The Falwell who said he was tired of being a "lightning rod" for criticism told CT that the reason "the general public thinks of me as a 'John the Baptist, confront-the-culture, nuke-the-earth' kind of person" is because he deliberately played one on TV. At the same time, he often befriended his sparring partners off camera. And gay-rights groups' favorite villain also called for churches to do more to combat anti-gay violence and "to bring down the rhetoric and the stridency" in fights over sexual ethics.

Usually, Falwell's seeming contradictions stemmed from truths Christians hold in tension. Falwell just preferred to state these truths separately and starkly, sometimes months or years apart. So with more than three decades of archived blunt quotes to choose from, Falwell gave activists of every stripe ample evidence to prove whatever point they wanted to make. He wasn't a caricature; he was a Rorschach test on which we could project our fears, wishes, and ironies.

You can see it in the tributes: Rick Warren praised Falwell as the founder of "dozens of other compassion projects," a ministry innovator, an encourager of thousands of young pastors, and a devoted pastor who stuck with the church he founded for 50 years. In short, Falwell was Warren without the acronyms. Ralph Reed saw him as a "groundbreaking progressive" who "awakened the slumbering giant of the evangelical vote" and oversaw "the marriage of that vote to an ascendant, confident Republican party." In short, Falwell was Reed with a church.

Cynical demagogues saw him as a cynical demagogue. Wide-eyed zealots saw him as a zealot. And, as The Wall Street Journal's James Taranto noted, "His foes portrayed him as a hater, in large part because of the hatred he inspired in them."

An unexpected tribute came from pornographer Larry Flynt, the subject of Falwell's most prominent legal battle, which ended in a landmark Supreme Court decision. "I hated everything he stood for, but after meeting him in person, years after the trial, Jerry Falwell and I became good friends," Flynt said. He told Larry King, "He cared about people. And I don't think that Falwell was mean-spirited at all."

Flynt, along with James Dobson, suggested that Falwell's weight might have hastened his death. "He was close to 400 pounds. And at 70-odd years, anyone knows you don't carry around that kind of weight," Flynt said. "I talked to him [about it]. I gave him a couple of diets. I even faxed them to his wife. He just loved to eat, you know. [He was] one of these guys that don't like to … stop eating, so they just let it kill them."





E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 10 comments.See all comments
Robert   Posted: June 14, 2007 10:44 AM
Sharon -I confess my ego is way too big, but like Falwell I just can't help it. I just can't seem to find the self control to reign in my appetite. Every time I try to refrain from allowing my ego to inflate further, I simply take another healthy portion of ego to go, following which I focus on the sins of others, such as Falwell's sin of obesity or his inability to keep his mouth shut. In fact, I generally find myself asking "What would Jerry do?" before I act, with the result that every time I think about being nice, kind or helpful, I find some other sin on the raise in Christian America and work myself into a frenzy of self righteous judgmentalism about. I never claimed to be free of addiction. In fact, I confess that I am addicted to sin in various forms, including arrogance, pride, selfishness, lust, etc. This list goes on, but I don't want to bore you with the details of my short comings. I am just grateful that being addiction free is not a requirement for forgiveness.

sharon   Posted: June 13, 2007 11:48 AM
And how much does your ego way, Robert? Arrogance is an indiscriminate virus that infects folks on either side of the political aisle. You didn't like Jerry Falwell. Say it as it is. Do not presume to speak for others, and pray, do not presume to be free from addiction.

Neil Gussman   Posted: June 13, 2007 2:35 PM
I am glad to know more about Dr. Falwell than the sound bites I avoided over the last three decades. I had the weird experience of becoming a Christian in 1974 when Evangelicals were still averse to politics. In 1976 shipped out for a three year assignment in Germany, a tank commander on the East-West border. In 1980, I returned to find the Moral Majority. I had just come to seriously accept that we are all sinners and Jerry Falwell, who seemed to be the paradigm of a Hellfire Baptist, implied there were many moral millions, not just a remnant. The contradictions just in the name Moral Majority convinced me to stay away from politics--especially power politics with Christian labels. Even though I disagree with Dr. Falwell, I am glad he was so forthright. Without him, I might have seen hope in Christian politics, but he remained a flashing warning sign of the dangers of politics from the day I returned to the US until his death.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search





















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christian History & Biography
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Ignite Your Faith
Leadership Journal
Marriage Partnership
Men of Integrity
Today's Christian
Today's Christian Woman
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com