Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
May 16, 2008
Free E-mail Newsletters:
RSS Feed | More Feeds | RSS Help

Home > 2007 > July (Web-only)Christianity Today, July (Web-only), 2007  |   |  
Do 'Gay Adoption' Opponents Oppose 'Obese Adoption'?
A Missouri judge's decision prompts the question.



ADVERTISEMENT

A Missouri judge ruled this week that a man would make an unfit father due to his weight. Gary Stocklaufer, a 500-pound trucker, was denied the right to adopt his cousin's infant son whom he and his wife had been fostering. The infant's court-appointed guardian said that there was concern that Stocklaufer would develop diabetes or sleep apnea due to his weight, Kansas City television stations KMBC and WDAF reported.

The concern about Stocklaufer's health and the subsequent health of the child after being placed in his home has echoes of the arguments used against gay adoption. Critics of adoption by homosexual couples have claimed that such homes are unstable and do not provide good role models.

But organizations that oppose adoption by homosexuals disagree on whether to similarly oppose adoption by the obese.

"You're dealing with a situation in which the state has the obligation, because the natural family has failed in some way, to make a determination as to the best interest of the child. And in that case, I think it's legitimate to take heath concerns such as this into consideration," said Peter Sprigg, vice president for policy at the Family Research Council. "For a person who weighs 500 pounds, there would be question about their mobility to be able to carry out some of the tasks involved in ordinary parenting, and there would be questions about their health and potential longevity, because of that."

However, Matt Barber, policy director for cultural issues at Concerned Women for America, believes emotional health risks should be considered before physical risks.

"You have to look at the totality of the circumstances. There are any number of factors that can put children in an environment where there are risks; there are always going to be risks," Barber said. "I think it's appropriate to consider the lifestyle that homosexuals engage in with all of the high-risk factors involved when you also take into consideration the fact that there is not a solid family environment with a mother and a father. Having the unique qualities that both a mother and a father bring and bear on childrearing, that is definitely the gold standard. To nitpick and to disqualify someone based on their weight or something like that, I don't know that that's appropriate."

Stocklaufer adopted another son seven years ago when he weighed about the same he does now. That adoption was approved by the same judge who ruled against him this week. Stocklaufer and his wife said they plan to appeal the judge's decision.



Related Elsewhere:

Earlier this year, Christianity Today covered the new U.K. sexual orientation regulations on adoption. Several other articles on family and same-sex marriage are available on our site.

Google News provides several links to the Stocklaufer case.





E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 9 comments.See all comments
DJ   Posted: August 01, 2007 7:27 AM
I am a married heterosexual male, fundamentalist Christian, and father of two children adopted from an impoverished country. I don't approve of homosexual marriages, or the lifestyle in general. However after having visiting orphanages in the country where my children were born, I have to believe that children in undernourished (either physically or emotionally) are better off in a household where they will be loved and nurtured - if the parents are gay, obese, whatever. My kids came from an environment where they had little chance of being anything but itinerant farm hands (i.e., modern day slaves) who quite possibly would never hear the truth of the Gospel. Through the adoption community, I know of children adopted from situations similar to my daughters who are now living in lesbian households. Is this ideal? Absolutely not. Do I believe these children have a hope of a better life, including possibly finding the love of Christ? Absolutely yes.

pamela   Posted: July 30, 2007 6:13 PM
Thanks for your comments Artm - I agree. How can these two be compared? What this case proves is that size discrimination exists. And shame on Christians who jump on the fat-hating band wagon with the rest of the world!! And please don't preach "gluttony" unless he preach it also to all the skinny people who are gluttons. Don't judge fat people - overeating is only one of the possibles reasons a person might be fat.

Agnieszka Tennant   Posted: July 30, 2007 5:18 PM
A revealing question!

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search





















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christian History & Biography
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Church Secretary Today
Ignite Your Faith
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Today's Christian
Today's Christian Woman
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com