Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
February 13, 2012

Home > 2007 > March (Web-only)Christianity Today, March (Web-only), 2007
Ready to Walk Apart?
Episcopal bishops reject oversight from "distant" prelates.




The Episcopal Church is at least one step closer to an historic split with the 78-million-member Anglican Communion. The national church's House of Bishops with its left-leaning majority rejected a newly proposed pastoral oversight council, calling it an "unprecedented" power play.

In a letter to the 2.1 million American Episcopalians, the bishops expressed a "strong desire" to remain within the Anglican Communion despite differences over same-sex rites and openly gay bishops.

But the bishops deeply disputed the communiqué that the Anglican Communion's top leaders (primates) issued in mid-February after they met in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. The primates, many of them theological conservatives, called for the American church to receive oversight from a pastoral council and for appointment of a "primatial vicar." The council and vicar would provide a means to keep conservative congregations and dioceses within the Episcopal Church.

The bishops raised significant concerns about the primates' plan, saying, "first among these is what is arguably an unprecedented shift of power toward the primates, represented, in part, by the proposed 'pastoral scheme.'" Under the plan, a non-American primate would chair the council and the primates would name two of the five council members. Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori, head of the American church, would name the other two.

The bishops said the plan violated their constitution, and they urged the church's executive council to turn it down. The Episcopal executive council meets in June and is expected to hear from an internal working group about the February communiqué. The bishops indicated they continue to address the "pastoral concerns" of conservatives through other means more acceptable to the bishops. But the national church is also backing litigation against conservative priests and parishes seeking to leave the denomination and hold onto their church buildings.

The actions of the House of Bishops, accomplished through three resolutions, took many church watchers by surprise. Jefferts Schori and others as recently as three weeks ago predicted this meeting would not result in decisive action. The primates have given the Episcopal Church until September 30 to indicate clearly that they would no longer allow any rite of blessing for same-sex couples and would prevent another openly gay man from becoming a bishop, as happened in 2003.

But instead of acting on those requests, the bishops passed three resolutions. In the resolutions, the bishops called the primates' plan "injurious to the Episcopal Church." They requested an "urgent" meeting with Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams to discuss their concerns. (Jefferts Schori admitted at a press briefing, "There is some belief in this house that other parts of the Communion do not understand us very well.")

The bishops said the plan violated their founding principles following their "liberation from colonialism and the beginning of a life independent of the Church of England."

"For the first time since our separation from the papacy in the 16th century, [the primates' plan] replaces local governance of the church by its own people with the decisions of a distant and unaccountable group of prelates," they said.

The bishops in their lengthy third resolution noted:

  • Primates set "simply impossible" conditions for the Episcopal Church in order to end boundary violations in which conservative overseas primates provide oversight to certain American parishes.





Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

Displaying 1–5 of 7 comments

AC

March 23, 2007  5:05am

To assume that "pro-homosexual religious folks" never read the Bible is a little ridiculous. There are different ways of reading the Bible; even those who claim to take the Bible "literally" do not follow everything in it. They also "pick and choose" the passages that they want, reading them through different lenses. I always find it interesting that people will say that the opposition to homosexuality does not mean that God does not love homosexuals--and then they bring up the idea that they are worthy of death! I am glad that the Bishops finally took a stand against the primates, in essence calling the latter's hand. This has to do with more than homosexuality--it has to do with power, which is what the conservatives want, among other things. Maybe it is time for the Episcopal Church to break with the Anglican Communion, which might be a good thing. Unity for its own sake is an overrated, and often dangerous, concept anyway.

J. Victor Cardoo

March 22, 2007  3:59pm

Just one word sums up the Episcopal Church in the USA as it is today - apostasy! Those who are truly born again should get out! No room for compromising the Word of God as the Episcopal Bishops are doing. They have turned their backs on God and God will give them up - Romans 1 vs.18-32 It´s so tragic! I live in Brazil where this kind of problem is just beginning. We need to watch and pray.

gary b.

March 22, 2007  2:06pm

I think maybe this coming split will finaly show who the true Bible believing people really are. What's wrong with having a church that wants to be conservative, and follow the Bible's teachings on sin and repentance? It's almost seems that sin has become a bad word in our churchs today. Let the liberal Christians go there own way. Ultimately they will have to answer to God in the end.

Gary

March 22, 2007  1:48pm

Susan ... do you read the Bible with accuracy and understanding? In Romans, chapter 1, the lust and actions of those involved in same gender sexuality is not said to be sinful, nor noted as a cause of sin. Rather, St. Paul's argument is in building a deductive means of making a point. The deduction is not about homsexuality. The deduction is about what is natural within the order of God's creation. Just as the earth was considered to be the center of the universe, and flat at that, St. Paul's understanding of natural laws was certainly not as developed as it would later be proved and accepted. Likewise, if you hold up Leviticus, kindly be prepared to hold up the whole holiness code and the applicable punishments ... along with carrying them out, as barbaric as some may seem in a modern world.

David Blontz

March 22, 2007  11:29am

God is so amazing. Here we have the churches of the "third world" telling those who brought them the Christ how to live in the body of Christ. In my United Methodist world we see that the really growing branches of our church are in Africa. In that scenario, God the ole' producer of comic irony, has the conservative "Central Jurisdictions" in league with the more conservative jurisdictions of the US United Methodist Church. And, of course, those elements of conservatism in the United Methodist Church have their root in the Methodist Church South. Who were they and what did they have to do with folk in Africa? God is good. Always several steps ahead.

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]



Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper

Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Kyria.com
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com