ETS Resignation Triggers Tradition Discussion
Debate over open theism preempted previous attempts to discuss Roman Catholic theology, said Bock, ETS president from 2000 to 2001. He expects discussion will address at least six areas: justification by faith, the role of the pope, Mariology, the sacraments, the extent of the biblical canon, and how Protestants' and Roman Catholics' views on each other have changed.
Gregg Allison, associate professor of church theology at the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, teaches about Roman Catholicism and previously worked with Campus Crusade for Christ in Rome and at the University of Notre Dame. He affirmed the desire many Christians have to connect with church tradition, but noted that Roman Catholics do not merely affirm the early church. They also recognize apostolic succession that ties together both the Council of Trent, which anathematized Protestants, and the Second Vatican Council, which recognized Protestants as brothers.
"I would consider myself an evangelical who deeply appreciates the great tradition of the church," Allison said, "but it's a chastened tradition."
Still, Allison said Beckwith's conversion should act as a wake-up call for evangelicals to consider tradition. Writing in 2002 for the Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, Scot McKnight said a connection with history is one reason why some evangelicals have lately flocked to Rome.
"Evangelicals need to have this conversation about our relationship to the great tradition," he said. "Evangelical churches in general need to think more carefully about historical theology and our historical rootedness. This dearth of historical consciousness and [the habit of] reinventing the church every half generation are biting us with people like Frank Beckwith."
Collin Hansen is a CT associate editor.
Copyright © 2007 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.
Related Elsewhere:
David Neff interviewed Beckwith about his conversion.
Collin Hansen commented in CT Liveblog on Beckwith's resignation and the following ETS statement.
Beckwith is a contributor to Right Reasons, a blog by conservative philosophers. His most recent post explains his decision.
Beckwith's own blog has links to online essays he has written.
Other recent news articles include:
Prominent evangelical returns to Catholic roots | Baylor professor resigns as head of conservative intellectual group. (The Dallas Morning News)
Baylor prof Beckwith becomes Catholic, resigns as head of evangelical society | Renowned evangelical philosopher Francis Beckwith has become a Roman Catholic and, as a result, has resigned as president -- and also as a member -- of the Evangelical Theological Society. (Associated Baptist Press)
Star Trek Into Darkness
(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Newsletters
Google
Comments
Displaying 1–3 of 9 comments
See all comments
Gary J Sibio
re: Gregg Allison's comment I wish Protestants would actually do a little research. Trent's anathemas do not apply to Protestants. In Catholic theology anathematizing someone means they are excommunicated. You can't excommunicated someone who is not part of your church in the first place.
Edison
If you watch the Catholic T.V. channl you will observe less then 20% of the things that you see and hear can be found in the New Testament. My appeal is not finding fault but to encourage them to teach the Bible. Let go of the beads and preach the Word. Blessings, Edison
Tim Deibler
Chuck: The ETS statement, "The Bible alone and the Bible in its entirety, is the Word of God written and is therefore inerrant in the autographs," is clearly an affirmation, not a denial. While its implications and corollaries include both affirmations and denials of various other beliefs, as is the case with any well-written doctrinal statement, the statement itself is positive in nature, not negative.