Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
February 13, 2012

Home > 2007 > October (Web-only)Christianity Today, October (Web-only), 2007
No Regrets
Christian student sues over commencement speech censure.




The 2007-2008 school year opened with another lawsuit alleging infringement of a Christian student's religious rights. Erica Corder, a Lewis Palmer (Colo.) High School graduate, sued the district school board, saying her principal unfairly disciplined her for mentioning her faith at last year's commencement ceremony.

Attorneys told CT that graduation-related lawsuits are rare. But free speech on public school campuses remains a hotly contested legal issue.

"Lawsuits over religious expression have been a fertile ground for lawyers," said Tom Hutton, senior staff attorney for the National School Boards Association.

Corder's suit asks for "reasonable" damages and a declaration that the school violated her constitutional rights. Now a sophomore at Wheaton College, Corder claims she was forced to apologize by e-mail before receiving her diploma, even though she hadn't violated any school policy. She hopes to clarify the law and to enable students from all faiths to speak out without fear of recrimination.

"I'm fighting for their rights, too," said Corder, whose parents live near Colorado Springs.

The Virginia-based Liberty Counsel will argue her suit. Founder Mat Staver won a similar case before the U.S. Supreme Court in 2002, obtaining a ruling that permitted Jacksonville, Florida, graduates to deliver commencement messages of their choosing.

"They used illegal means to extort an apology from her," Staver said of Corder. "They threatened to withhold her diploma, which is serious."

According to Mike Johnson, senior legal counsel of the Alliance Defense Fund, "schools don't necessarily have an anti-Christian agenda; it's confusion about the law."

Yet some of the confusion stems from differing interpretations of the law.

Hutton noted that soon after the U.S. Department of Education issued religious-rights guidelines in 2003, a court told one Nevada school district to prevent proselytizing at graduation. Another Nevada district changed its commencement policy in response, but was sued by the American Civil Liberties Union.

"There's a million and one variations on factual issues," Hutton said. "Ultimately, it's the courts that decide, not the [federal government.]"

Carl Esbeck, a law professor at the University of Missouri, said Corder's case hinges on the circumstances surrounding her speech. "If the government [views commencement as] a limited public forum and it's private speech," he said, "then private speakers have access to the forum and within [it], there's to be no viewpoint discrimination."

Regardless of her lawsuit's outcome, Corder remains steadfast in her belief that God wanted her to share her views.

"On a day as important as my graduation, I wanted to give glory to him," she said.



Related Elsewhere:

The Rocky Mountain News published Corder's commencement speech.

News coverage includes:

Colorado Student Files Lawsuit Over Commencement Speech That Mentioned Jesus | A student who said she was told she wouldn't get her diploma unless she apologized for a commencement speech in which she mentioned Jesus has filed a lawsuit alleging her free speech rights were violated. (Associated Press)
Valedictorian sues over 'Jesus speech' reprimand | In a lawsuit filed in federal court this week, Corder says the school violated her rights to free speech and equal protection. (Rocky Mountain News)
Earlier: Grad surprises school officials with comments about Jesus (Associated Press)

Other Christianity Today articles about law and politics are in our full coverage section.





Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

Displaying 1–5 of 8 comments

Glenn

October 23, 2007  10:57am

Our children watch those ever-so-boring acceptance speeches on TV awards shows when rappers and pop singers and actors regularly thank God for getting them where they are, and they also read the news articles where a celebrity credits God for their recovery from alcoholism or getting through a divorce or other trial. And yet when a high school student earnestly stands before her peers and asks others to discover for themselves the One who has made her successful, the school tries to post-censor her remarks. She was smart not to include her remarks in rehearsals, because they certainly would have been censored, but the email apology was uncalled-for and abusive. It's like having a child stand in front of his classroom and apologize for being black or male or for using a wheelchair or speaking with an accent. She cannot deny her faith. Why should she apologize for it? If someone doesn't agree with her, they can just ignore her. But hopefully, some will not ignore her...

Gene

October 22, 2007  8:57pm

The problem is the interpretation of the first part of the First Amendment which reads: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". This has been interpreted as setting up a barrier between church and state. Under this interpretation, Corder was wrong. As I read that amendment, any law which prevents me from expressing my faith in a public manner is incorrect, and therfore Corder was right. This argument will not be decided here. Instead, each and every one of us should speak out about the present interpretation of this amendment. I do regularly. Do you?

A Hermit

October 22, 2007  3:54pm

To have freedom of religion, must be free to speak about one's faith. One should be free to share one's faith experience, but not to push one's own religion. Ms. Corder should also be mindful that she is speaking to the class as a whole, and she should try to touch others with a different belief system than her own. With respect to saying prayers in school, saying prayers with one's mouth isn't necessarily praying.

Esther

October 22, 2007  1:42pm

Hurrah for Corder! Way back in 1945, before the days of legal actions, I had a reprimand from my principal. He called me into his office to talk to me about some of my Christian convictions. (I guess they would be considered "legalistic" today.) The convictions were my commitment to my faith which was grounded and confirmed, and the principal did not change my mind. Classmates knew of my Christian dedication, voted me in as a student council officer and we remained friends even if/when they did not agree with me. I ended up going to a Christian University and he ended up giving a small amount of money to my need when he knew I was going to school "on faith." After I graduated, he was one of the first to congratulate me!

Paul

October 22, 2007  12:58pm

It sounds like the school over-reacted. She should have been permitted to talk about her faith. However, I think stories like these, the "cultural inflammatory" type serve no constructive purpose, and are used as a distraction against more important issues. These cultural issues will never be solved and really just act to make people pissed at some allegedly liberal conspirancy to rid the country of all religion. We ought to really focus more on economic policies which CAN be changed and have real, tangible results.

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]



Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper

Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Kyria.com
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com