Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
November 22, 2008
Free E-mail Newsletters:
RSS Feed | More Feeds | RSS Help

Home > 2008 > AprilChristianity Today, April, 2008  |   |  
The Other Baptists
New alliance may be more partisan than it lets on.



ADVERTISEMENT

Headlined by former Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton, the New Baptist Covenant meeting in January attracted about 15,000 Baptists to Atlanta. Although speeches throughout the event called for nonpartisan cooperation on social issues like poverty and racism, critics saw the covenant's launch as politically motivated.

An informal alliance of Baptist organizations brought together by Carter, the covenant includes 30 partner churches and organizations, four of which are historically African American. All told, it represents up to 20 million Baptists. By comparison, the more conservative Southern Baptist Convention (SBC), which was invited to the conference but did not officially attend, has 16 million members.

The New Baptist Covenant does not yet have an agreed-upon agenda, said Bill Underwood, president of Baptist-affiliated Mercer University in Macon, Georgia, and co-chair of the convention's steering committee. But the convention is already proving useful to its members, he said.

"People have established relationships that didn't previously exist and identified opportunities to work together on endeavors that wouldn't have come about but for getting to know one another," Underwood said.

However, SBC president Frank Page said that the covenant seemed intended to unify only one wing of Baptists.

"I have concerns when it seems this is organized and promoted by only those who are from a more moderate theological perspective," Page said. "One has to wonder if there is a true openness to a dialogue and an inclusion of conservatives."

The timing of the event—scheduled for an election year, right before Super Tuesday—raised eyebrows among observers, as did the speakers. Former Vice President Al Gore joined Carter and Clinton, while Mike Huckabee withdrew from the event last May, citing the left-leaning speakers and his disapproval of Carter's public criticism of President Bush.

"It suggests there was some political motivation," said John Green, senior fellow at the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. Clinton's presence in particular signaled a political agenda, Green said, because Clinton is generally not seen as seriously religious and because he has been actively campaigning for his wife's presidential bid.

The convention's social-justice emphasis and avoidance of issues like abortion, homosexuality, and women's ordination were also markedly different from the traditional concerns of conservative Baptists, Green said.

"It may operate as something of a counterweight to the SBC, no matter the intentions of the organizers," Green said, noting that the 20-million-strong New Covenant is already capturing news attention.

But Underwood said the coalition doesn't want to counteract other Baptists. "If this group begins politicking," he said, "it will very quickly fall apart."

While the covenant may address issues that political leaders also address, like climate change, world hunger, and HIV/AIDS, Underwood said he anticipates that their perspective and approach would be different.

Leaders of the New Baptist Covenant met in March at the Carter Center to discuss future actions.



Related Elsewhere:

"Baptists Push Unity and a Fresh Face" has more about the Celebration of a New Baptist Covenant.

Our other coverage of U.S. Baptists includes:

TULIP Blooming | Southern Baptist seminaries re-introduce Calvinism to a wary denomination. (January 17, 2008)
Immersed in a Baptism Brouhaha | Changes of heart renew centuries-old divisions. (September 28, 2007)
Reasonable Cause | Southern Baptists debate the role of their Message in hiring, firing. (July 23, 2007)
Brewing Battle | Missouri Baptists frown on beer as evangelistic hook. (June 29, 2007)




E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 8 comments.See all comments
John G.   Posted: March 05, 2008 2:48 PM
If Clinton, Gore and Carter are involved, then the purpose is obviously political, and left-wing political at that. All three have squandered their opportunities to make a positive difference in this nation and the world by their support of (or, in Carter's case, failure to oppose) abortion, homosexuality, and radical special interest groups. And Carter's anti-Israel statements make his theology suspect, as well. They can utilize faith-talk when it suits their purposes (as is also true of Mrs. Clinton and Senator Obama), but their actual actions and positions put them outside the pale of orthodox Christianity. I am not questioning their salvation (God alone knows this), but their failure to line their ideas up with the Scriptures.

Keith   Posted: March 05, 2008 3:30 PM
This was a terribly biased and poorly written article. It was just as inevitable as the sunset that the SBC and this publication would criticize any effort to engage in intellectual and spiritual discourse over vital issues of this day. This is the "my way or highway" crew. We critcize Carter yet applaud the inept and dishonest performance of the current administration. We criticize Clinton and give Cheney and Haliburton a free pass. Seems that we have been totally co-opted by a politcal conservitism, which does not always seem Christian. If we evangelicals do not wake up soon we will lose any appearance of honesty.

Dr RA Blacketer   Posted: March 05, 2008 7:53 PM
The extremely bitter and highly partisan comments on this artcle demonstrate that the author has done a great job; she has hit the nail right on the head. When the church ties itself to one particular political ideology or party, it always comes at the cost of the gospel, the cost of our integrity, the cost of our mission. Where Dobson sins on the right, Campolo sins on the left. The gospel is not left wing politics, nor is it right wing politics. When it is portrayed as one of these, it is no longer the gospel, it's political spin. Not to mention liable to taxation by the IRS. "Do not put your trust in princes" [or parties or ideologies, one might add], "in mortal men who cannot save." Psalm 146:3.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search





















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Church Secretary Today
Ignite Your Faith
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Today's Christian Woman
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com