Jump directly to the content

Election 08's 'False Clerics and Schismatic Spirits'

The ubiquity of religion in this campaign season is distinctly un-Lutheran.

The kingdoms are not antagonistic toward one another. Both are God's, and their dialectic is "one of the most valuable and enduring treasures of Luther's theology," wrote German theologian Paul Althaus. It is a treasure because of the liberating message proclaimed by Luther "that society need not be run by the Church in order to be ruled by God," according to William Lazareth, the former Lutheran bishop of New York. Yet too many Protestants have a hard time grasping the breathtaking implication of this insight, which reminds me of Luther's grumble in his commentary on Psalm 101:

Constantly I must pound in and squeeze in and drive in and wedge in this difference between the two kingdoms, even though it is written and said so often that it becomes tedious. The devil never stops cooking and brewing these two kingdoms into each other. In the devil's name the secular leaders always want to be Christ's masters and teach Him how He should run His church and spiritual government. Similarly, the false clerics and schismatic spirits always want to be the masters, though not in God's name, and to teach people how to organize the secular government.

This is not to say that every Lutheran is immune to the disease we see in this year's electoral battles; all too many Lutheran pastors in Nazi Germany hailed Hitler as a redeemer. But if Lutherans stick to their theology, they are more likely than others to eschew social gospel heresies that made Christian idealists welcome the United States, the Soviet Union, Communist China, and even Pol Pot's Cambodia as precursors of the kingdom of God. Lutheran theology teaches that transforming culture is precisely not what the gospel is all about. Christ made himself small not for "the culture" but "for me." He did not die at the cross to make our society nicer or fairer; no, he suffered to redeem the believer from sin, thus giving him eternal life.

In the 1930s, Lutheran theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer, who was later martyred for his resistance against Hitler, observed during his stays in America:

One of the characteristic features of church life in Anglo-Saxon countries, and one from which Lutheranism has almost entirely freed itself, is the organized struggle of the Church against some particular worldly evil. … It is necessary to free oneself from the way of thinking, which sets out from human problems and which asks for solutions on this basis. Such thinking is unbiblical. The way of Jesus Christ, and therefore the way of all Christian thinking, leads not from the world to God but from God to the world. This means that the essence of the Gospel does not lie in the solution of human problems, and that the solution of human problems cannot be the essential task of the Church.

Nine years from now, in 2017, Protestants will celebrate the 500th anniversary of the Lutheran Reformation. This is a good time to remember its theological treasures, which differ from earthly treasures in that they multiply when shared. Where the world is concerned, Lutherans have perhaps the soberest message of all Protestant traditions. Like Paul and Augustine, Lutherans know that our secular reality cannot be fixed. They know that it is finite. It will disappear. Until that happens, though, we must roll up our sleeves and manage our fallen world as well as we can, preventing chaos and lovingly serving each other — not by the gospel, which would be impossible, but by natural reason. We are free to act rationally in this world thanks to our knowledge of our redemption in the kingdom of grace. But the gospel has nothing to say about traffic rules, illegal immigration, the price of gasoline, or the deployment or withdrawal of forces to or from the Middle East. The gospel cannot really be associated with any worldly cause. The gospel will illume the Christians' good sense, we hope, and affect their personal comportment to the extent that it makes others curious about their faith. But the gospel is no instrument of secular power.


More from Christianity Today

La complejidad hispana: Todo cambió en el 2012

¿Hacia dónde vamos?—Una palabra para los creyentes hispanos sobre forjar un futuro.
Jesus' Elevator Speech

Jesus' Elevator Speech

Or was it his inaugural address? There's a difference.

The Latest in Movie News, May 20, 2013

Box office news, Benedict Cumberbatch, Cannes, and AFI honors Mel Brooks.
Divine Rehab

Divine Rehab

Whatever your addiction, God's grace is the only hope for a way out.
Get Instant Access
Christianity Today Magazine
Subscribe now for a year (10 issues) at $24.95 for print, iPad, and instant web access.

International Orders

Comments

Displaying 1–3 of 11 comments

Isaac C. Rottenberg

April 05, 2008  5:02pm

As a survivor of Nazi horrors, this kind of two-kingdom theology frightens me as much as Jeremiah Wright's "ideologization" of the Gospel. The big problem in Germany was not so much Lutheran pastors who hailed Hitler, but a Lutheran quietism that robbed churches of their prophetic voice. What irony to quote the sad case of Paul Althaus, whose theology of "peoplehood" made him sympathetic to the Nazi Blut und Boden heresy and Bonhoeffer who, after his US visit, became a political activist. The Gospel of the Kingdom is indeed not about traffic rules, but it IS -among other things-about such mundane realities as justice. Thank the Lord, tertium datur--as I hope future contributors will point out.

Larry Perrault

April 04, 2008  3:47pm

Huckabere of course was talking to a room full of Bible-believing Christians. In other words, to them, he was stating the obvious ideal that The Consitition should specift wgat they believe to be the truth. In fact, it already does. Bit clarification is called for in our perceptual context, as it was with abolition. Still, Huckabee needed to be cognizant of the fact that his words would be recorded, played to the public, and pictured as a call to theovcracy. Therefore, the comment was insufficently careful.

Wally

April 04, 2008  2:50pm

This comment is more directed at Matt than at the article. I hope that's OK. Matt, it's not a matter of Luther or the Bible. Perhaps the author set an unintentional trap for you by quoting Luther instead of Jesus, but more than one distinction of Jesus' come to the mind of this Lutheran who happens to agree with much of the article. Challenged on taxes, Jesus said, "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's and to God the things that are God's." Asked if he claims to be a king by Pilate, Jesus answers, "My kingdom is not of this world!" So Siemon-Netto's "two kingdoms" distinction not only goes back to Luther, but also to Christ himself. That being said, keeping the two kingdoms separate and knowing what belongs to which kingdom is not necessarily easy, and Lutherans to tend to be [certainly this one is] a bit quietist as history shows. I merely one to point out that Luther's very useful doctrine of the two kingdoms derives from Jesus himself, contrary to your assertion.

See All 11 Comments
You must be a Christianity Today subscriber to post comments
(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).
Login
or
Subscribe
or
Register

Don't Miss

Forgiving Iran

Forgiving Iran

Long before I knew the true God, he helped me release my hatred.
Guilt Gone Wild

Guilt Gone Wild

The right kind of guilt can be healthy. But false guilt depletes your soul and ministry.

Training for "One Pitch" Preachers

Training for "One Pitch" Preachers

If you're stuck in a rut, this is how to mix things up.

more | current issue

Facebook

CT eBooks & Bible Studies


Shopping