Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
February 12, 2012

Home > 2008 > AugustChristianity Today, August, 2008
The Other Election
Faith-friendly Democrats may take more congressional seats from Republicans this fall.




The presidential primaries have diverted attention from down-the-ballot House and Senate races, yet political observers say Congress could be where the Democrats win their most significant victories in November.

While polls show Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama running neck and neck for the presidency, the Democrats appear poised to significantly expand their congressional majorities. A couple of factors are tilting key races their way.

First, the faltering economy, gas prices, and the ongoing war in Afghanistan and Iraq seem to be higher priorities for voters than social issues. Second, in regions where social issues still count with voters, Democrats are once again nominating faith-friendly social moderates in some conservative congressional districts, a strategy they employed with some success in 2006.

So long as the strategy works, Democratic leadership will continue to recruit candidates from the conservative wing of their party, said Amy Black, associate professor of political science at Wheaton College. This year, pro-life Democrats have already won special elections in Louisiana and Mississippi.

"The special elections in Louisiana and Mississippi show that traditional GOP voters are prepared to switch parties for Democrats who run as social conservatives," said Mark Silk, founding director of the Leonard E. Greenberg Center for the Study of Religion in Public Life.

Republicans were already in trouble before the special elections. More than 20 Republican members of Congress have retired since 2006, some hastened, perhaps, by the party's loss of majority status. Senate Republicans are defending 23 seats compared to just 12 for the Democrats. In addition, the Democrats have lost none of their incumbent senators.

To make matters worse for the Republicans, the Rothenberg Political Report lists only one Democratic seat, the one held by Sen. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, as vulnerable. The report lists at least seven vulnerable seats for the Republicans. Should Obama win the presidency, he could be backed by a large House majority and filibuster-proof Senate.

"Democrats are in a position that we haven't seen in a century: to follow up a landslide victory with another, possibly even a larger one," said Eric Sapp, senior partner at Common Good Strategies, which helps Democratic candidates to engage religious communities. "That will be really significant, perhaps most importantly because the Democrats that have been winning and will be coming into Congress are much more 'faith-friendly' and tend to come from strong faith backgrounds themselves."

Common Good Strategies worked in 2006 with three victorious Democratic candidates: Sen. Bob Casey of Pennsylvania, Gov. Jennifer Granholm of Michigan, and Gov. Ted Strickland of Ohio. All three politicians outperformed the Democratic average among white evangelicals by about 17 percentage points. And each candidate's Republican opponent was a noted social conservative.

The Democratic openness to faith comes at the same time Republicans want to prove they are not beholden to the Religious Right, Silk said. But he noted that there is still time for the political terrain to shift.

Same-sex marriage nearly disappeared as an election issue in 2006, after playing a key role in 2004. However, Wheaton's Black said the recent ruling by the California Supreme Court to overturn a ban on gay marriage might elevate the issue once again for social conservatives.



Related Elsewhere:

Our full coverage of the 2008 election is available on our site.

"Spoils of Victory," about evangelical voting patters in 2006, said pro-life Democrats hoped the party's takeover would remove the stereotype of Democrats as social liberals.





Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

Displaying 1–5 of 12 comments

A Hermit

July 10, 2008  9:17am

A simple, good informational article. The emotional responses of other readers to this article are out of place and betray a lack of consideration of the whole of the gospel in applying it to the politics of our day. Materialism, greed, and the wars they spawn (Iraq) are the biggest threat to 'family values' and continued human existence, not gay marriage and abortion (though they are serious issues). The political choices of today are not black and white. To vote Democratic often means to vote for abortion and 'gay rights'. To vote Republican means to vote for materialism and greed (those who support the wealthiest and most powerful people and corporations through cutting taxes, environmental regulations, and social programs for the poor, supporting building weapons of mass destruction and militarism). I consistently vote Democratic as the lesser of two evils, but don't condemn those who don't.

ann

July 10, 2008  12:08am

we just need to remember that God isn't a member of any political party.

Ruth

July 09, 2008  4:02pm

Jesus invited the lost to the table. When was the last time a Republican Christian invited anyone but his colleagues to the table? I believe in Jesus Christ as my personal Savior, not the Democratic Party. I do not support abortion nor do I support gay marriage; however I do support the Lord's way, each one must choose, not be cohersed nor subjected to; but they must believe in their own heart that He is Lord. If He is indeed Lord in your life then choose a president that is willing to serve all mankind not just the one that agrees with you for the moment, that is what has been done for the last eight years.

marshall

July 09, 2008  2:56pm

Didn't your Evangelical Manifesto say we should stop focusing on politics. CT does nothing but this in recent years, and not very well. The depth of discussion on the nature of man, the role of government, comparative political philosophies, and the nature of power is about an inch deep. It is embarassing. Instead, you churn out this "faith-friendly" fluff and Obamaphile nonsense, and applaud yourselves for seeming relevant. Is because the cultural and political elite and the left seem to now listen and like? You're useful to them, and now share their lexicon, and don't challenge their power. What is your get on this? A check, a place at the table? Feeling relevant and smart?

Michele

July 09, 2008  2:50pm

Gene-we always need to assume the best in people and offer one another grace even if we disagree with their positions...God is the only who judges someone's heart. Barack says Jesus is Lord of his life--his journey may look different form yours just as yours looks different than mine ...but the bottom line is we all seek to put Jesus first in our life ..look at Barack's life (not through the media lens but by his own words and those who know him) and the way he has served his community, the oppressed the 'least of these.' Read his words in his own books. It is a very dangerous place to claim someone is lying about their relationship with God...let's focus on how we can be serving our neighbor instead of wasting energy questioning other's faiths.

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]



Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper

Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Kyria.com
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com