Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
November 23, 2009
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > 2008 > AugustChristianity Today, August, 2008  |   |  
Zipping It
Donna Freitas says that when it comes to sexual ethics, nonreligious schools are failing their students.




ADVERTISEMENT

You argue that purity culture is the dominant mode of thinking about sexuality on evangelical campuses. Why do you find it problematic?

Both young men and women within purity culture experience enormous pressure to erase sexual desire completely. While there's a lot of support for students to think about what purity means and how to maintain it, the real question is, What happens when they don't? What happens when they fall short or make a mistake? It can have a shattering effect on their relationship with God and, often, their relationship with the larger community. For both men and women, this leaves them silent. I interviewed students for whom I was the only person they had told about what they were doing; they had no idea whom to talk to about it.

Then there's the issue of "ring by spring or your money back" or the "senior scramble," which I encountered across the board at the evangelical colleges. It is largely something that falls on women's shoulders. In purity culture, college is a place where women are supposed to find a husband, almost to a point that to them it seems more important than their education. I encountered a real fear among women that they wouldn't have that ring. Even though they didn't necessarily agree with this standard, they all experienced the pressure to get engaged. I think this expectation is amazing—that to be married by the time you graduate is not only part of what it means to be a good Christian girl, but also a good Christian college graduate.

But there are also positive elements of purity culture, especially born-again virginity. A lot of people in the non-evangelical world laugh at the idea that a person could wake up one morning and declare themselves a renewed virgin. But I met students who spent years becoming born-again virgins. I feel like it's not widely advocated enough: people who spend a lot of time reflecting on their sexual experience, repairing their relationship with God, doing so with a mentor, and then getting themselves in a place where they're not denying they were sexually active, but they're owning it. They're saying, "I'm spiritually pure again, and I'm going to be confident about it."

I may not love all of [born-again virginity], but I think it's a way out of hookup culture. People need conversion or redemption narratives for their sexual experiences and their sexual pasts. Those are really absent on the spiritual campuses.

Most evangelicals would say that students on spiritual campuses not only need redemption narratives—they need redemption itself. In a sense, students need more than the story that makes change possible.

This is to me where the real hope lies for students at spiritual schools. The other piece of my survey was that I found that students across the board register a tremendous amount of religious desire during their college experience, and some begin to see spirituality as a way they can begin to change their lives and their pasts. The question is, Will universities pay attention to that religious desire and try to give students resources to have conversations about what to do with that desire?

share this pageshare this page



E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 8 comments.See all comments
ZACHARY FARINA   Posted: September 03, 2008 12:38 AM
Ms. Beaty: As you brought out in your article, when it comes to Christian education, the most dangerous period for our children is between grade school and high school. Thus, homeschool. I had to homeschool my children (with the help of charter schools and homeschoolhebrew.com). If someone outside of the So Cal area has better opportunities, go for them. Public schools, however, have continued to be a real problem in So Cal.

tony   Posted: August 27, 2008 3:25 PM
Donna Freitas is cute in a "born again virgin" sort of way. Why she can't get a date?

Pete Benson, editor UNITYINCHRIST.COM   Posted: August 27, 2008 3:19 PM
The article is a good barometer to what's going on in both the Christian schools and colleges and the secular ones, as well as showing the pressures young people come under. Are any of these places teaching them what they need to know once they do get married (since so many are rushing to get (and give) that ring? See www.HOWMARRIAGEWORKS.COM just to get a clue as to what I'm talking about. So much efforts goes into finding Mr. or Miss Right, while so little effort goes into how to maintain a relationship, or just what that relationship entails. If more young people understood the sound principles that make up a relationship, I think it would even transform their dating habits, and help them make realistic and proper choices.

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search






















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com