Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
November 23, 2009
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > 2008 > August (Web-Only)Christianity Today, August (Web-Only), 2008  |   |  
Franklin Graham Criticizes Film About His Dad
But his older sister says Billy: The Early Years is faithful to their father.




ADVERTISEMENT

But Billy Graham's autobiography indicates that the scene with Jones is accurate—with Jones's ire a likely a result of Graham's questioning the school's strict views and his decision to transfer to Florida Bible Institute.

In Just As I Am, Graham wrote, "I asked for an interview with Dr. Bob in his office and told him about my discontent and my thoughts of leaving. His voice booming, he pronounced me a failure and predicted only more failure ahead."

McKay and Gigi Graham both vouched for the accuracy of the scene.

"We consulted 10 or 12 biographers on that part of the story," said McKay, "and nearly all of them concurred with our portrayal. And people who [had] worked for Bob Jones have told us that's what he was like. We have eyewitnesses to Bob Jones acting this way, and our goal was to tell the truth in what happened."

"Some people have asked me about that scene," added Gigi Graham, "and I've said, 'Dr. Bob was pretty hard on my daddy.' People who knew Dr. Bob told me he was that way."

DeMoss also noted a scene where young Billy faints at the hospital when he learns that wife, Ruth, had given birth to their first child, Gigi—when in fact, Billy had been preaching in Alabama at the time.

Neither Gigi Graham nor producer McKay dispute that fact, but they say that Franklin Graham is nitpicking.

"People need to remember that the movie is fiction based on fact," Gigi Graham said. "Daddy was not at my birth, but who cares?" Gigi Graham, who has seen the movie about 10 times, said filmmakers were simply injecting some humor into the scene.

"Look," added McKay, "it's a movie, not a documentary. We were just trying to humanize the experience in that scene. But every step of the way, we tried very hard to be faithful to Dr. Graham's story."

Another scene that Franklin Graham apparently objected to shows Billy and Ruth playing a game of catch with a baseball, but DeMoss says that never would have happened.

"I don't know if my mom ever threw a baseball or not," Gigi Graham said. "But again, who cares? I think the scene indicates the sweet love story between Mother and Daddy."

McKay seemed especially stung by the criticism about the film's details.

"We did a lot of research before we even sat down to write the screenplay," said McKay, who was already an experienced researcher as a documentary filmmaker—including one on the life of Billy Graham. "We bought errors and omissions insurance to make sure we got everything right—authenticating every scene, every story line, every fact. The insurance carriers give you some artistic freedom, but they make sure you stay faithful to the underlying facts.

"We had to provide the law firm 750 pages of documentation, and it took about nine months to complete the policy. We had two of the best law firms working on it, and it cost a lot of money." He wouldn't say how much.

McKay continued, "We truncated a few events in the film, because we were trying to tell a lot of story in just 90 minutes. But other than that, we were exceedingly meticulous. Because of my documentary background, I was extra careful. We wanted this to be a testament to Dr. Graham's life, and I care deeply about his legacy."

Coproducer Larry Mortorff added, "We did plenty of research, and to me, we've done a blessed job honoring Billy Graham's life. The film couldn't be kinder to the Grahams. After a recent screening, someone came up to me and said, 'You've preserved the work of Billy Graham for future generations. Thank you. Now my children can know his story too.'"

share this pageshare this page



E-mail this pageE-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 21 comments.See all comments
K   Posted: August 31, 2008 4:18 PM
In declining to take perhaps any issue with perhaps any inaccuracies that the article mentions regarding the film, Billy and Ruth Graham's daughter, Gigi, is being gracious. If I had the authority to make the decisions in the film, whether or not the filmmakers call it a documentary, I would like to think that I would not think (as perhaps the filmmakers do not) that Gigi's graciousness absolves me of my preference and ability to make adjustments for unnecessary inaccuracies. For example: replacing a couple's ball playing, if the two never engaged in the activity, with an activity that they did sometimes engage in. And why not? Authenticity is generally at least as interesting and satisyfing in the long run. From this article, Franklin's perspectives appear to me as understandable and respectable as Gigi's responses are understandable and gracious.

Katie   Posted: August 27, 2008 8:26 AM
I don't think Gigi Graham should have publicly disagreed with her brother Franklin. She should have gone to him privately and discussed her concerns, perhaps encouraged him to make a more positive statement about the movie if she felt this strongly about it. It sounds a bit like public ridicule. I sensed that Franklin was justs feeling a little protective of his Father and wanted more acurracy in the movie. IT appears that Gigi liked the more gentle side of Mr. Graham portrayed, which is fine, but she could have left her opinion about her brother out of her comments. It causes family discord.

lauralee   Posted: August 23, 2008 12:43 AM
Same thing done with Janette Oke's Love Comes Softly series. The movies were very good, but nothing-- after the first one-- compared to the wonderful Christian modeling in the books. The books had some excellent life related experiences including one young woman who married out of jealousy a disturbed young man who eventually killed her. My mother, whom I prayed for 45 years came to know the Lord through the specific use of modeling and Scriptural application. Wish producer would remake the movies and be more true to the originals. Anyone who hasn't seen the movies, please do, but reading the books is even better. Let's pray that movie makers can be true to the original stories rather than trust their own improvisations. Sounds like we should pray for the Graham siblings to present a united front, although different children in a family may see things differently, the key issue is veracity. Ruth Graham would have something to say about this if she were here.

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search






















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com