Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
February 11, 2012

Home > 2008 > December (Web-only)Christianity Today, December (Web-only), 2008
Leap of Faith
Tony Blair, Middle East envoy, says religion and globalization go together — in a good way.




Tony Blair, the controversial former British prime minister who left office in June 2007 and then converted to Roman Catholicism, is back in the headlines. With Israel's military actions in Gaza this week, Blair has an influential role as an envoy to the Middle East for the Quartet on the Middle East (United States, United Nations, Russia, and the European Union). These four powers have been pressing for a negotiated solution between Israelis and Palestinians and strongly favor a two-state solution.

After Israel launched its current military actions across the border with Gaza, Blair on Saturday told the news media in London, "The terrible events and tragic loss of life in Gaza require, in the immediate term, the introduction of a genuine calm in which the rocket attacks aimed at killing Israeli civilians and the Israeli attacks on Gaza cease so that the suffering of the people, which is severe, can be lifted. Then, as I have said many times before, we need to devise a new strategy for Gaza, which brings that territory back under the legitimate rule of the Palestinian Authority in a manner which ends their suffering and fully protects the security of Israel."

In early December, Blair was at Yale University, where he lectured about globalization and religious faith. He spoke with CT senior writer Tony Carnes in a joint interview with Religion News Service and other news media. Later, during his lecture and chapel address, Blair listed ten themes concerning religious faith and globalization. During his long career in public service, Blair was elected British prime minister three times, serving from 1997 to 2007. His remarks are edited for clarity and length.

You appeal to the common values found in different religions. President Bush appeals to the values inherent in human dignity. Is there a difference?

It's a different process, but the same approach. The thesis, if you like, of [the Faith and Globalization course at Yale] is to explore aspects of faith in globalization, like faith in a liberal democracy, like faith in human rights, and so forth.

Globalization operates to push people together, to blur distinctions between different nations and cultures. It's helping to create a multi-faith society. That faith becomes a constructive and progressive force to provide globalization with a human face and with some spiritual capital.

Alternatively, globalization could be a reactionary and destructive force that pulls people apart. In a multi-faith society, it is by people understanding each other that we learn to respect each other. By respecting each other, [we] get to peaceful coexistence.

Should corporations and governments be open to receiving the human face that faith might want to put upon globalization?

You might have said a year ago that globalization is an impersonal impulse. It operates at a purely material level. One of the things we've learned through this global economic crisis is the importance of trust, confidence — the ability to rely on the word of the other person. To make globalization work, we need values. The need to have some sense of spiritual capital is an important part of building both human capital and a deep, thriving global system.

How do you respond to author Christopher Hitchens, who believes religion poisons everything?

My dad's an atheist and quite militant about it. It is perfectly possible to find examples of religious faith being destructive and reactionary. It is, however, also possible to find examples of religious faith inspiring people to do great things — great works of compassion, social progress, of enlightenment. The best selling book in America in recent years has been The Purpose Driven Life by Rick Warren.





Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

Displaying 1–5 of 10 comments

Olaf

January 06, 2009  5:26am

This man Blair is totally sterile and lives in a world that does not exist. Yes, indeed, a true dream lover. Point me to the Muslim who does not celebrate the demise of the twin towers, or who demonstrated against their fundamental Muslims anywhere in the world. The greatest achievement for a Muslim is to be like Mohammad and every Muslim is working on it to a lesser or higher degree. Not unlike a Christian we are working to become more like Jesus. This Blair man is reaching for a poison chalice and offering this to every committed Christian. Why don't you show me the passage in the Koran where Mohammad's god Allah has a son that frees mankind from their sin's when repented of. As soon as you find this passage, Blair becomes my trusted friend and I will be a dream lover too.

Exymo

January 05, 2009  6:17pm

What, exactly, does Mr. Blair mean by 'spiritual capital'? A resource to be manipulated? An investment? A commodity? We are in this dreadful mess because we already treat people as if they ARE capital already, worthless enough to be disposable for the worst of reasons. However, ALL of us, from the weakest and most voiceless to the strongest and most prosperous, are creatures of the living God and we are obligated before God to treat each other that way. A global religion will be formed to force 'spiritual capital' and the souls who have it into some sort of conformity that simply isn't, and can never be, authentic and from the depths of the heart. Bandying around vague terms like spiritual capital in inherently as dishonest as calling America's form of economy 'capitalist.' Its a word that sounds good and is very malleable to mean anything and everything. Blair is such a politician!

MP

January 02, 2009  3:59pm

How interesting that we need to build "spiritual capital." I wonder what that is? You dont hear the Prophets and Apostles talking about the need to increase spiritual capital in their time, nor do they speak as if their only value is instrumental to building a multi - faith society. I am also fascinated that Blair, who speaks like an old fashioned theological liberal, finds Rick Warren as an exemplification of what he is advocating - the loweset common denominator of self invented religion. Not once does he mention God, let alone the particularity of God make know in Jesus Christ. Not once does he cite Scripture to support what he says. What is "inter" or "multi" faith about this? If what makes Christianity important is that it contributes something vague called "values" which have no connection to God's self revelation, then why should we even bother?

Ryan

January 02, 2009  3:02pm

hmm it seems as if he forgot to include everything Mr. Blair said 3. Religious faith can operate positively in support, for example, of the United Nations Millennium Development Goals to reduce poverty and advance development. Or it can operate negatively, through FUNDAMENTALISM or extremism. http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/editorials/hc-blair1222.a rtdec22,0,3165516.story

Dave

January 02, 2009  10:12am

Blair is a narcissistic war criminal, who speaks in this interview of 'the importance of trust'. I saw him on television in the immediate leadup to the Iraq war, saying "trust me" on the question of the threat of Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction. When no such WMD were found and this question of 'trust' was found to be the typical politician-speak which we are all so tired of, he refused to resign and needed to be forced out of office. CT's introductory blurb to the above article makes no mention of this, simply calling him "controversial". Would CT also simply call any other war criminals "controversial"?

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]



Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper

Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Kyria.com
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com