The Health Care Crunch
Let's make sure any reform plan we pursue avoids the single-value syndrome.
A Christianity Today editorial | posted 2/05/2008 08:51AM

2 of 2

Financial stewardship. We do not believe in health care at all costs: There is indeed a time to live and a time to die. Neither do we weigh human life and health against the calculations on a spreadsheet: Every human life, created and loved by God, is of inestimable value. As the longevity of Americans risesand with it, the costs of caring for the elderlythis tension will become increasingly acute. Still, any strategy worth supporting should hold these truths in tension.
Access of the marginalized. While a just health-care plan should work for people of every race, ethnicity, and social class, we advocate a strategy that is biased on behalf of the dispossessed. Our legal system, when it is functioning at its best, protects the rights of the innocent; we're convinced that in the coming months and years, the President and Congress can create a national health-care strategy that will first and foremost protect the poor.
We believe that an effective and lasting health-care strategy must honor these four principles to some degree. But as with any complex public policy, Christians will disagree about their priority and implementation. That's all to the good, as iron does sharpen iron.
For the sake of rhetorical neatness and persuasive power, some will be tempted to ground their plan primarily on frugality or on freedom or some other single-value concern. This may win support, but it will not create a balanced and measured strategy that will stand the test of time.
Copyright © 2008 Christianity Today.
Click for reprint information.
Related Elsewhere:
Other Christianity Today editorials and articles on the 2008 Presidential elections are available in our full-coverage sections.