Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
August 21, 2008
Free E-mail Newsletters:
RSS Feed | More Feeds | RSS Help

Home > 2008 > JulyChristianity Today, July, 2008  |   |  
God Is Not Dead Yet
How current philosophers argue for his existence.



ADVERTISEMENT

You might think from the recent spate of atheist best-sellers that belief in God has become intellectually indefensible for thinking people today. But a look at these books by Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and Christopher Hitchens, among others, quickly reveals that the so-called New Atheism lacks intellectual muscle. It is blissfully ignorant of the revolution that has taken place in Anglo-American philosophy. It reflects the scientism of a bygone generation rather than the contemporary intellectual scene.

That generation's cultural high point came on April 8, 1966, when Time magazine carried a lead story for which the cover was completely black except for three words emblazoned in bright red letters: "Is God Dead?" The story described the "death of God" movement, then current in American theology.

But to paraphrase Mark Twain, the news of God's demise was premature. For at the same time theologians were writing God's obituary, a new generation of young philosophers was rediscovering his vitality.

Back in the 1940s and '50s, many philosophers believed that talk about God, since it is not verifiable by the five senses, is meaningless—actual nonsense. This verificationism finally collapsed, in part because philosophers realized that verificationism itself could not be verified! The collapse of verificationism was the most important philosophical event of the 20th century. Its downfall meant that philosophers were free once again to tackle traditional problems of philosophy that verificationism had suppressed. Accompanying this resurgence of interest in traditional philosophical questions came something altogether unanticipated: a renaissance of Christian philosophy.

The turning point probably came in 1967, with the publication of Alvin Plantinga's God and Other Minds: A Study of the Rational Justification of Belief in God. In Plantinga's train has followed a host of Christian philosophers, writing in scholarly journals and participating in professional conferences and publishing with the finest academic presses. The face of Anglo-American philosophy has been transformed as a result. Atheism, though perhaps still the dominant viewpoint at the American university, is a philosophy in retreat.

In a recent article, University of Western Michigan philosopher Quentin Smith laments what he calls "the desecularization of academia that evolved in philosophy departments since the late 1960s." He complains about naturalists' passivity in the face of the wave of "intelligent and talented theists entering academia today." Smith concludes, "God is not 'dead' in academia; he returned to life in the late 1960s and is now alive and well in his last academic stronghold, philosophy departments."

The renaissance of Christian philosophy has been accompanied by a resurgence of interest in natural theology, that branch of theology that seeks to prove God's existence apart from divine revelation. The goal of natural theology is to justify a broadly theistic worldview, one that is common among Christians, Jews, Muslims, and deists. While few would call them compelling proofs, all of the traditional arguments for God's existence, not to mention some creative new arguments, find articulate defenders today.

The Arguments

First, let's take a quick tour of some current arguments of natural theology. We'll look at them in their condensed form. This has the advantage of making the logic of the arguments very clear. The bare bones of the arguments can then be fleshed out with further discussion. A second crucial question—what good is rational argument in our supposedly postmodern age?—will be dealt with in the next section.





E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 71 comments.See all comments
jeri   Posted: July 04, 2008 7:27 AM
To my knowledge, no one has come up with any other satisfactory explanation for the magnitude and precision of the universe.

T.J.   Posted: July 04, 2008 2:42 PM
This article is a well-written summary of the traditional arguments for God's existence. In that sense, it would be very helpful for people to understand what apologetics really has to say about the rationality of belief in God. I guess where I part ways with Dr. Craig is his analysis of post-modernism. Dr. Craig says that our culture is not "relativistic" about science and technology. The new paradigm approach to science which has been advanced by thinkers like Kuhn means that yes, even some scientists themselves have a different epistemology about what they know. A culture as a whole will not necessarily be entirely modern or post-modern. For those operating out of a modern paradigm, we will continue to need an apologetics based upon modern assumptions, and Dr. Craig and others have done a wonderful job of providing that. For those who are post-modern, and yes, this is a meaningful category, we will need to rethink whether modern apologetics will continue to be as effective.

Dave2   Posted: July 13, 2008 2:58 AM
Not rated
Setheroo, why do you make the rash assumption that any product of natural processes is ipso facto untrustworthy? My eyes work pretty good, and so does my brain. naspinski, in case you hadn't heard, logic classes are no longer part of the trivium. Causes no longer need to have at least as much neo-Platonist 'reality' as their effect. Check out Hume, Frege, and the Scientific Revolution in your local library. Christensen of Missouri, you don't need a knockdown demonstration that everything's a product of natural processes to make an educated guess, and in any case being humble and saying "I don't know" doesn't exactly lead you to an immaterial mind who created everything ex nihilo. Annie, if "God's terms" involve being unreasonable, then refusing to accept God's terms is like refusing to join

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search





















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Church Secretary Today
Ignite Your Faith
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Today's Christian
Today's Christian Woman
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com