Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
February 11, 2012

Home > 2008 > July (Web-Only)Christianity Today, July (Web-Only), 2008
Fiction for the Faith-Starved
The Shack tells a compelling, if imperfect, story.




The Shack
By William P. Young
Windblown Media, 2007

Exclusive for CT Online readers: Download chapter one of The Shack by William P. Young, free from Oasis Audio and powered by Audible.com.

Call it the little book that could. William P. Young's The Shack, a 256-page self-published novel that was turned down by several Christian publishing houses (ostensibly for being too theologically edgy) is finding a grassroots audience that just keeps growing. Seldom has there been such a buzz about religious fiction.

With endorsements from Wynonna Judd ("this story has blown the door wide open to my soul") to Eugene Peterson ("this book has the potential to do for our generation what John Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress did for his"), The Shack has captured the imagination of readers and garnered sales figures only dreamed of by most authors. A little more than a year after its May 2007 publication date, The Shack has more than 1.1 million copies in print. (Consider that 10,000 copies is a respectable number for a novel in most Christian publishing circles.) As of July 9, it sits atop the trade paperback fiction lists of The New York Times and Publishers Weekly, and ranks #5 and #6, respectively, in overall Web sales at Amazon and Barnes & Noble. The Shack has now spent 22 weeks on USA Today's Top 150 bestsellers list, and is currently in its highest position at #5. Capitalizing on its success, Windblown Media has entered a copublishing venture for future titles with FaithWords and is currently in the pre-production phase of turning The Shack into a feature-length film.

For all the hubbub, it's a simple story. Mackenzie Allen Philips is on a camping trip in Oregon with his three young children, when his youngest daughter, Missy, is kidnapped and brutally murdered. Evidence of her death is found in an abandoned shack. The vicious murder rips the young family apart, and when the story resumes four years later, Mack is drifting and grief-stricken. He receives a typewritten letter from someone called "Papa," his wife's nickname for God, inviting him to meet at the shack. Initially, he writes it off as the joke of a particularly sadistic prankster. But eventually — despite his misgivings — he risks everything and goes.

What follows are scenes of redemption, of trying to make sense out of suffering and loss, of grace, and of love. Mack meets God at the shack, but in ways he'd never imagined before. Young's depiction of the Father, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit are unusual and invigorating, part of the charm and uniqueness of the book. Young asks us to rethink our assumptions, to see with new eyes and hear with new ears what we've seen and heard many times before, and to risk being uncomfortable with what we read. So, yes, it's an eye-opener when God appears to Mack as a "big black woman with a questionable sense of humor," the Holy Spirit as an Asian woman named Sarayu, and Jesus as a Middle Eastern laborer. Heresy? Probably not. Unusual? Yes.

Imagine if you could ask "God in three persons" your hardest questions face to face. Compelling to think about, isn't it? "If you couldn't take care of Missy, how can I trust you to take care of me?" Mack asks God in one poignant conversation. The painful scenes are often leavened with humor, as when Mack tells God, "I think it'd be easier to have this conversation if you weren't wearing a dress."

The Shack is an example of a good story transcending the mechanics of problematic writing. The book needed a rigorous edit; the dialogue is rough in spots, and even the website is rife with spelling errors. Though a typical, even expected, self-publishing problem, it's still disappointing.





Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

Dot from Texas

July 15, 2008  12:45pm

Good grief, get past the theology -- if you all want theology, go read Wayne Grudem. This is a book for anyone who has ever asked why God allowed something horrific to happen. How could God just stand there and "comfort" Missy as she was being murdered -- would a real father just stand by and watch? Why didn't the murderer have a heart attack and die instead? This is Mac's dilemma, and it is our dilemma, too. Why does one survive cancer and another die, even though people are praying for both of them? Why was the young family coming home from church all killed by some fool driving 98 mph on a Sunday morning? As Mac wonders, how can he trust God with his own life if this is what God allowed to happen to an innocent child? This is what the book is about -- can God be trusted? This book is not intended to be theologically sound; and by the way, if one of you actually understands and can explain the Trinity to the rest of us, I'm sure we're all ears.

Gary Blevins

July 11, 2008  10:22pm

I'm not going to reproduce my comments on "How to Read The Shack." However, this review further highlights the main problem we have in the church today. We are quick to criticize those who cling too tenaciously to God's Word, but will tolerate almost anything that makes someone feel closer to God. All that matters is that we "connect" with people. It's OK to misrepresent God as long as people are "reached." We must worship God as he really is or it is not truly worship. To talk about rekindling or reinvigorating someone's faith based on the distorted theology of this book is frightening. It is not enough to "reach" people if we are pointing them in the wrong direction. God is not honored by that and people are not ultimately "helped." I agree that this book should stimulate discussion in the church. But that discussion must lead to a thoroughly biblical understanding of the issues addressed. Anything less leads to idolatry.

Anonymous

July 11, 2008  11:51am

There is something wrong when people get all hot and bothered with God taking on a female form. Femaleness was created in the image of God. At what point are the critics insulting the image of God? If Driscoll and Mohler dislike this book, then it has to be good. These theologians have rotten fruit. They need to spend time in sincere prayer and ask God to dwell in their hearts and shape their attitudes.

Chris Oakes

July 10, 2008  8:56pm

Why does it seem so difficult for people to accept the story as a parable. Young's intent is not to cause all readers (or any readers) to view God as a large African-American woman. Mack even recognizes ultimately that the only reason he's seeing such a representation is so he won't fall back into preconceptions which limit his understanding, and therefore his interaction, with God. The conversations Mack has with God (in all of His manifestations) are deep conversations regarding relationships and trials and faith and doubt. Mack is engaging God. I don't believe Young's intent was for anyone to see Mack's engagement with God as exemplifying what their engagement with God should be like. Perhaps the questions being raised about the true nature of God, particularly what the Trinity looks like, are questions which need to be raised. Most people just don't get the Trinity. And interestingly enough, the writers of the New Testament texts didn't explain God in trinitarian terms.

Wes O

July 10, 2008  4:05pm

I have just started reading this, but having heard reviews from pastor's such as Mark Driscoll and reviewers like Tim Challies (sp?) I am hesitant to read and am probably going to tip toe through it as to watch for land mines. The one question I do have is why bring up theological themes and then say it's not a theological book. And if the theology is wrong then you wouldn't have Christian fiction, then right? You would just have fiction, that is either modalist or New Age in representation. Just questions that I hope to have answers to after reading.

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]



Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper

Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Kyria.com
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com