Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
November 25, 2009
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > 2008 > July (Web-Only)Christianity Today, July (Web-Only), 2008  |   |  
Theology in the News
It's Not Broke, So Fix It
New EFCA statement of faith clarifies positions on controversial doctrines.




ADVERTISEMENT

But the document may be equally notable for what it does not say. There is an article about the Holy Spirit, but it says nothing about certain gifts of the Spirit, such as prophecy or speaking in tongues. It says the Lord Jesus mandated baptism as one of two ordinances, along with the Lord's Supper. But it does not specify the mode or timing of baptism. Very few EFCA pastors baptize infants, but the denomination allows this option, said Greg Strand, the EFCA's director of biblical theology and credentialing. He said the EFCA historically accommodated refugee Methodists and Presbyterians who still wanted to baptize their infants.

Unlike Baptist denominations, adult baptism by immersion is not a requirement for membership in the EFCA. This practice dates back to the EFCA's roots in the Scandinavian free churches that split with the Lutheran state churches. The free churches recoiled against requiring anything but a profession of faith in Jesus Christ for membership. But the EFCA's openness on baptismal modes has led churches to de-emphasize baptism altogether, Strand said. The 1950 statement says only that water baptism and the Lord's Supper are "not to be regarded as means of salvation."

"The ordinances became a matter of indifference," Strand said. "That's a weakness. And that's what we attempted to redress in article seven in our new statement of faith." The 2008 statement says the ordinances "confirm and nourish the believer." David Neff, editor in chief of Christianity Today media group, observes the new tone of the document, which also states the ordinances "visibly and tangibly express the gospel."

Strand and many other leaders relented on one proposed change. They worried they could not garner support from the required 67 percent of delegates to the EFCA national leadership conference. The proposal would have dropped premillennialism from the statement of faith. Objections to the change recall an earlier era during the early and mid-20th century, when dispensationalism became closely associated with historic Protestant orthodoxy in America. Strand said some delegates argued that opening the door to other end-times views would undermine inerrancy and put the denomination on a slippery slope to liberalism.

Concerns about promoting a social gospel were raised about the article on Christian living, Strand said. But the surviving article reminds Christians that "God's justifying grace must not be separated from his sanctifying power and purpose." It goes on to say that God commands Christians to live out their faith with "compassion toward the poor and justice for the oppressed."

"One of the big issues the evangelical church needs to address today is the both/and of orthodoxy and orthopraxy," Strand said. "That is why we've been intentional about including both in a statement of faith."

By being intentional about revising the statement of faith before it breaks down, EFCA leaders just might save themselves the trouble of fixing it later.

Collin Hansen is a CT editor at large, master of divinity student at TEDS, and author of Young, Restless, Reformed: A Journalist's Journey with the New Calvinists.



Related Elsewhere:

Previous Theology in the News columns are available on our site.

share this pageshare this page



E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 20 comments.See all comments
  Posted: July 24, 2008 3:11 PM
The hardliners obstruction of any attempts to include post and ammillenial brothers into worship within the EFCA is not principally because of eschatology but rather hermeneutics. Whether Jesus' kingdom is established by physically writing laws as he stands on earth during the millennial reign or whether his kingdom is established through the gospel going out into all nations is not the point that exasperates the dispensationals, it is the reformed covenental hermeneutic that has been held by the pillars of our Christian faith from Luther and Calvin to Owen, Edwards, Spurgeon, Warfield, and countless other giants until the time dispensationalism was invented in the 1800's. After listening to the business meetings involving this issue I am saddened that the majority of Christians from the time of the reformation would be excluded form membership especially when historic premil is virtually no different than ammill. and satisfies the statements.

ruth   Posted: July 21, 2008 1:31 PM
I'd like to remark on John's final sentence in his posting. The EFCA did not infact "argue" about these changes. Throughout the process, the tone for revision was respectful, patient, thoughtful and bathed in prayer. Be careful in assuming there were arguments and wasted energy. The EFCA continues to listen to God's Spirit as decisions, both large and small are made within the denomination. More than the revisions to the Statement of Faith, the big news is how unity prevailed in the midst of change. The EFCA is to be commended for allowing debate, dialog and diversity into the process. Ultimately...the world is watching...there was not in-fighting, just a desire to remain true to the Word and loving toward one another. God's name was lifted up. That's big news!

Allan   Posted: July 20, 2008 2:48 PM
You always need to watch a denomination closely when they revise their statement of faith. Not having read the new EFCA statement, it seems at face value that they did well. The United Church of Canada, by contrast, used their latest statement of faith to smuggle in heretical ideas by the boatload to replace their largely orthodox doctrine of the past. Theirs wasn't broke, so they broke it.

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search






















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com