Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
July 10, 2009
Free E-mail Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > 2008 > JuneChristianity Today, June, 2008  |   |  
ELECTION 2008
From Blessing to Burden
Candidates are scrutinized ever more closely for their spiritual associations.



ADVERTISEMENT

Each of the presidential candidates has been caught off guard by accusations leveled against their religious connections.

While Barack Obama continues to distance himself from the "incendiary language" of his pastor of 20 years, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, John McCain has renounced anti-Catholic comments made by Texas pastor John Hagee, who endorsed McCain in late February. McCain has also come under criticism for calling the Rev. Rod Parsley, who endorses total war against Islam, his "spiritual guide." Meanwhile, political essayist Barbara Ehrenreich and others have criticized Hillary Clinton for her affiliation with the Fellowship Foundation's National Prayer Breakfast.

"Neither Obama, McCain, or Clinton expected they would be criticized on this basis," said John Green, a senior fellow at the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. "They had not thought these issues would be controversial."

Presidential hopefuls took note after President Bush's narrow reelection in 2004, which was credited largely to his appeal among people of faith. However, as this election's candidates have emphasized their personal beliefs and religious connections in an attempt to influence voters, they've found that it has opened them up to new criticisms, said Green.

"One of the reasons religious appeals are effective is because many Americans care deeply about their faith," he said. "But they also have doubts about other people's faith. Because they care about religion, they are concerned if they hear things they don't agree with."

In a twist not seen in recent presidential campaigns, candidates have been held accountable not just for their own religious views, but also for the views of those with whom they associate.

"Obama and Clinton are making an effort to say, 'Look, we Democrats are religious also. We are faith friendly,' " said Stephen Monsma, research fellow at Calvin College's Paul Henry Institute for the Study of Christianity and Politics. "That has led the media to take a closer look at those religious figures with whom the candidates have aligned themselves."

Such intense analysis from the media and opposing campaigns isn't limited to religious affiliations, said Jim Tonkowich, president of the Institute on Religion & Democracy. Nearly every close relationship with a candidate undergoes scrutiny, he said.

Such inquiries are appropriate, he said, "because what you are really asking is, 'What kind of decision maker is this person? Who does he choose to surround himself with? Is he a good judge of character?' "

However, the examination of candidates' religious connections has become a diversion, indicative of an immaturity in covering religion in politics, said David Gushee, ethics professor at Mercer University.

In the end, the offensive language of Wright or Hagee won't impact voters much anyway, said James Skillen, president of the Center for Public Justice. "When it comes down to the political capability of a person being President, voters have to look at a wide spectrum," he said. "I'd be very surprised if it made a difference."

Monsma advises that Christian voters make several distinctions when they hear reports about the views of candidates' pastors or religious associates. "First, is this a person who has endorsed the candidate or is this someone the candidate is close to spiritually? Second, what exactly did the person say? Were they basically on the right track but used extremist, unthoughtful, or unhelpful language?"

The key question, Monsma said, is what a candidate says about issues. Just as the average members of a congregation can't be held accountable for their pastor's words, Monsma said, neither can those running for office.



Related elsewhere:

John Hagee recently apologized for his comments about Catholics.

In March, Collin Hansen interviewed Thabiti Anyabwile, author of The Decline of African American Theology, about Wright and the appeal of black liberation theology.

Other Christianity Today coverage of Jeremiah Wright includes "Jeremiah Wright, Evangelicals' Brother in Christ."

"Meet the Patriot Pastors" has more about Rod Parsley and the 2006 elections.

Pastors and preachers are discussing Wright over at Leadership Journal's Out of Ur blog.

Our coverage of the 2008 campaign is available on our site.





E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 6 comments.See all comments
Andrew   Posted: May 22, 2008 7:33 PM
You have slandered Rev. Rod Parsley in this piece, either deliberately or (more likely) out of laziness, because you have repeated common mistakes the media has made about him lately. 1) Rev. Parsley is not, and have never claimed to be, McCain's spiritual guide. At one campaign event, Sen. McCain introduced Rev. Parsley as "a" spiritual guide. Big difference. 2) Rev. Parsley has strongly criticized Islam, and properly so, but he has never endorsed total war against Islam. When writing about any public figure, it's usually best to do some research. Otherwise, as you have demonstrated, it looks like you don't know what you're talking about. Your readers deserve beter!

Mike   Posted: May 22, 2008 11:06 AM
We should NOT judge others by a standard we are not willing to judge ourselves. That is called hypocrisy. How many of you believe EVERYTHING that your pastor dishes out? If you do you must then be a 100% doer of the Word because there are some pastors out there that preach well. While 100% pure preaching and absorption or belief is possible (some a hundredfold, some 60, some 30 [Matthew 13:23]), I don’t know where it’s happening on earth right now. Personally, I can't say whether Obama or MaCain have been so influenced by their spiritual advisors or former advisors as the case maybe to the point of impairing their spiritual judgement, if they have any. Believers should never be duped again by someone who claims to be a Christian so they can get your vote, exhibit #1: George Bush. He calimed to hear from God and where has he taken us or leaving us!

Barry   Posted: May 22, 2008 9:27 AM
Ever since Evangelicals sold themselves lock, stock, and barrel to the Neocons, a candidate's religion has become a litmus test for electability in the eyes of many Christians. This is indeed a sad devlopment because it has allowed the electorate to be manipulated by right-wing politicians. The religion question needs to be taken out of the equation when judging a candidate's fitness for higher public office.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search





















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Church Office Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Today's Christian Woman
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com