THERE WAS no Stoic resignation, no Socratic dignity, nothing to make it easy or natural: Jesus looked at his coming death and saw it as monstrous and dreadful. What compelled the imagination of the early believers was precisely thisthat he was obedient in spite of all, that he endured the nightmare for the sake of God's mercy.
Rowan Williams, Open to Judgement
[T]HE GOSPEL ACCOUNTS were all written "on this side of Easter." That is to say, early followers of Jesus, including the authors of the Gospels, had the benefit of looking back on an event and seeing in it the working of God. In addition to the cross being an act of human treachery and brutality, they were able to see the crucifixion of Jesus as also God's act. The crucifixion was viewed not only as an act of hostility on the part of human beings toward God's messenger, but also an act of immeasurable love on the part of the one who had sent that messenger.
Thomas R. Yoder Neufeld, Recovering Jesus
CHRIST'S DEATH doesn't replace our death. It enacts it, [the apostle Paul] suggested. That's what theologians call inclusive substitution. Because one has died, all have died. As a substitute, he is not a third party. His death is inclusive of all.
What happened to him happened to us. When he was condemned, we were condemned. When he died, we died. We were included in his death.
Miroslav Volf, Free of Charge
GOD'S VERDICT reversed the world's judgment. He exalted his humbled servant, Jesus, and gave to him a name above every other name, in heaven or on earth. By accepting this position of greatest humiliation, Jesus had taken the road to highest exaltation. The least of all and the servant of all had become in fact the greatest of all and the Savior ...1