Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
November 22, 2009
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > 2008 > March (Web-only)Christianity Today, March (Web-only), 2008  |   |  
Gambling Opponents Say Moral Argument No Longer a Trump
As casinos and lotteries spread, two-thirds of Americans join in.




ADVERTISEMENT

Kansas recently enacted legislation to become the first state to have state-owned casinos. The state Lottery Commission is considering developers to build and operate four state-run casinos — in part to keep money from flowing to casinos in neighboring Oklahoma and Missouri.

The Kansas casinos are projected to rake in $200 million a year in revenue, said Sally Lunsford, spokeswoman for the Kansas commission.

About 2 percent of the take will go to developing programs for problem gambling, she said.

Money, she said, has to come from somewhere. "There's not a whole heck of a lot of people who are raising their hands, saying, `Please, raise my taxes!'" she said.

Still, whether or not her voice is being heard, Barbara Knickelbein is not stopping her fight against gambling, even though her organization, No Casinos Maryland, changed its name from Religious Communities United in Opposition to Casino-Style Gambling, as it was known when it launched in 1995.

A voter referendum that would put 15,000 slot machines at various racetracks and other locations will be on the Maryland ballot in November. The projected $600 million that the slots would produce would be unsteady, and an unfair tax on the poor, Knickelbein said.

The organization focuses its opposition on morality or economics, depending on the audience, she said, but religious groups have a stake in the outcome.

"It's the churches who are going to have to pick up the pieces," she said, "when families are torn apart by gambling."



Related Elsewhere:

Earlier Christianity Today articles on gambling include:

Coalition Breaking | Christian lobbyists in Alabama fight over track betting. (July 25, 2007)
Addiction a Click Away | Internet gambling is hooking shut-ins, including Christians. (March 25, 2003)
Weblog: Salvation Army Rejects $100,000 From Lottery Winner | Last week, the winner of the $314 million Powerball lottery promised to tithe his winnings, rekindling the debate over whether churches should accept gambling money. (Jan. 02, 2003)
Fighting Chance | Bible-belt churches gear up for lottery battles in Tennessee and North Carolina. (March 25, 2002)
Weblog: No Ban on Internet Gambling | Ban on Internet gambling fails in U.S. House of Representatives (July 19, 2000)
Beating the Odds | Christians in two states defeat gambling by exposing its harmful effects on the poor. (Jan. 10, 2000)
Gambling Panel Urges Moratorium | By a 5-to-4 vote, the panel, after two years of study, suggests "some policymakers at all levels may wish to impose an explicit moratorium on gambling expansion, while awaiting further research and assessment." (June 14, 1999)
Gambling Away the Golden Years | Casinos are seducing an alarming number of seniors. Where is the church? (May 24, 1999)
Gambling with the Enemy | Instead of folding, the church should be upping the ante (May 18, 1998)
None Dare Call It Sin | How Mississippi's Bible Belt succumbed so quickly and so completely to the gambling industry. (May 18, 1998)
Spurning Lady Luck | Churches reject funds tainted by gambling. (Oct. 26, 1998)
Nominations Delayed | Will Gambling Study Be Biased? (January 6, 1997)
Voters Reject Betting Measures | Gambling ballot measures failed in five statewide initiatives during November's election. Gambling forces won only in Arizona, where voters approved a plan to allow five more Indian casinos, and in Michigan, where three casinos won approval in Detroit. (December 9, 1996)
Casino Backlash Gains Momentum (Apr. 8, 1996)
Christians Battle Gambling | Will Christians reclaim the high ground in a battle to fight America's 'recreational pastime'? (Nov. 14, 1994)
share this pageshare this page



E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 12 comments.See all comments
cmr   Posted: March 19, 2008 3:13 AM
Some think that the only reason to object to gambling is because some people do it to excess and it damages them - and argue that the occasional punt is OK But I suggest that we look at it another way - To win any money as a gambler, other people have to lose money - and the money they have lost is money they have spent on hope - the hope of winning - hope which turns out to have been a false hope. To buy a lotto ticket once a year may be a small outlay for the person who buys it - but if they win millions that is only because millions of others have lost. Some say it is just entertainment- but buying a theatre ticket everyone has the same opportunity to get the value of what they bought - the enjoyed show - but in gambling people buy in for the hope of winning - a hope that is never going to come true for most - now - you may say - in sport someone wins at the cost of others losing - but sport is a contest of skill - gambling is odds - mostly stacked against you -

kaisen   Posted: March 19, 2008 1:20 AM
This debate displays how silly some would argue the neutrality of social behavior. How odd the nery same week of Purim and Good Friday the neutrality of gambling should be justified as not a sin. Purim, the 'casting of lots' (gambling) for what day the Jews should all be executed. Good Friday, the Roman executioners 'cast lots' for the garments of our Lord. This same week my aunt is beyond bankruptcy from playing video poker and we need to seek power of attorney to manage her addiction. The gaming industry is a value minus business. It produces nothing of value, it only consumes. My aunt is not the only personal encounter, I know several others. The symptoms are all the same; denial of losing (sometimes even past the most obvious conditions), justification (why it's the same as taking any other kind of risk), anger at the economic difficulties of life (if others weren't spending their money on ..... they could help me more). Finally they will deny God.

Jim D.   Posted: March 18, 2008 8:50 PM
Being a native Las Vegan, my views may differ from most. I believe gambling in controlled moderation is not a big deal, but when deciding to bring gambling to your home town, you really have to count the cost's. Problem gambling is no small deal. I don't have the statistics, but I would dispute Mr. Farenkopft's 1 %. Just from living in Las Vegas I would have to say it's closer to 5%, maybe a little higher. Never the less gaming provides a lot of good paying jobs and provides us with a strong and stable economy. I also would add that most places that add gaming are not going to reap the benifits of Nevada and Atlantic City.

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search






















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com