Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
November 26, 2009
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > 2008 > March (Web-only)Christianity Today, March (Web-only), 2008  |   |  
Speaking Out
The Evangelical Founding Fathers
Remember the concerns of those to whom Jefferson wrote on the separation of church and state.




ADVERTISEMENT

The alliance between evangelicals and Madison and Jefferson reappeared at critical junctures. When Madison ran for Congress in the first elections, against the charismatic war hero James Monroe, it was the Baptists who rallied to him because of his support for the separation of church and state. It was the evangelicals who prodded Madison into proposing a Bill of Rights that guaranteed religious freedom and limited the government role in religion.

The most pungent illustration of the alliance rolled toward the White House on New Year's Day in 1802. Standing at the door of the new presidential mansion in Washington, President Thomas Jefferson saw two horses pulling a dray carrying a 1,235-pound cheese with an inscription: "Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God." The cheese was a gift from evangelical activist the Rev. John Leland of western Massachusetts — a "thank you" for Jefferson's support of the separation of church and state.

It is commonly assumed that Baptists supported the separation of church and state to avoid persecution. That was certainly partly true. The Baptists of Virginia suffered a wave of persecution at that time. But the evangelical passion for keeping church and state separate had theological roots, too. Christians were to render unto Caesar what was his — the religious and political spheres were meant, by Jesus, to be separate. Just as important, both the Baptists and the philosophers believed in the primacy of individual freedom. For Madison and Jefferson, individual liberty trumped the rights of kings or governments; for evangelicals, an individual's personal relationship with God was more important than church and clerical authority. Let's remember who will provide the final assessment of a life well lived, Leland wrote: "If government can answer for individuals at the day of judgment, let men be controlled by it in religious matters; otherwise, let men be free."

If alive today, 18th-century evangelicals might well agree with their theological descendants that the nation needs more religion. But they would disagree that it requires more state support or advocacy for religion. It was the evangelicals who worked with Madison to shape the true "founding faith," which was not Christianity or secularism. It was religious liberty — a revolutionary formula for promoting faith by leaving it alone.

Steven Waldman, editor-in-chief of Beliefnet.com, is the author of Founding Faith: Providence, Politics and the Birth of Religious Freedom in America, published by Random House.



Related Elsewhere:

Other articles on America's founders are in our history section.

Founding Faith is available from ChristianBook.com and other retailers.

share this pageshare this page



E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 15 comments.See all comments
John McAdams   Posted: March 29, 2008 12:13 PM
Waldman simply doesn't understand modern conflicts. The issue is not whether government should "promote" religion -- although the secular militants see government promotion in even-handed treatment of religion. We have government promoting a gay aganda, telling Christian kids in public schools that the Christian view of homosexuality is wrong. We have Christian groups being denied use of public facilities, while secular groups have full access. The Founders never dreamed that this would happen. They would be appalled that it's happening.

Greg   Posted: March 29, 2008 11:29 AM
I am simply wondering when evangelicals will wake up to the fact that the very heroes mentioned in this article would also REJECT the entanglement with government under IRS 501 3(c) recognition. None of these Baptists would have approved of recieving tax "incentives" in exchange for agreeing to censor speech from pulpits, regardless of the content being censored. 20th-21st century evangelicalism is a sell out. And this nation is about to reap the fruit that the evangelical sell outs have sown by mingling church seed with state seed.

Ryan   Posted: March 26, 2008 9:40 PM
What Leroy fails to mention is that our understanding of the text is progressive, just like our now belief that slavery is wrong & women have the right to vote. The passage cited is very clear there is a separation: how that is applied is part of Baptistic history for 400 years & is part of every demoninational statement of belief that I know of.

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search






















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com