Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
February 10, 2010
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > 2008 > OctoberChristianity Today, October, 2008  |   |  
THE CHRISTIAN VISION PROJECT
A Holy Longing
Beauty is the hard-to-define essence that draws people to the gospel.



ADVERTISEMENT

The saying, "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder," suggests that attempting to say anything concrete about the nature of beauty is a futile task. As soon as one person deems something beautiful, ten others will show up deeming it ugly. But theologians of the early and medieval church did not assume beauty was subjective. Borrowing from neo-Platonic philosophy, they believed that for something to be beautiful, it must also be good and true, with God reigning as the ultimate source of beauty. Today's church can be thankful for people like David Taylor, who connect such esoteric reflections to the church's mission. As the arts pastor for 12 years at Hope Chapel, a vibrant congregation in Austin, Texas, Taylor helped believer artists make the connection between worship, creativity, and community. Here, Taylor makes a similar connection between beauty and gospel proclamation to answer this year's cvp question, "Is our gospel too small?"

What more, you may ask, do we want? … We do not want merely to see beauty, though, God knows, even that is bounty enough. We want something else which can hardly be put into words—to be united with the beauty we see, to pass into it, to receive it into ourselves, to bathe in it, to become part of it. —C. S. Lewis, "The Weight of Glory"

Many of the houses on my block in north-central Austin, Texas, are architecturally ugly. Built in the late 1950s, they are one-story, squat structures. Slapped-on metal porches hang out from exceedingly flat roofs. The asbestos siding is faded. The construction is cheap, the brick dingy and dull. Collectively they perform the duties of houseness fine. But I can't say that I walk down my block and feel awe. I feel glum. I'm grateful for my house, of course, and many good people live on my street, but if I look too long the ugliness of our houses starts to weigh me down.

That feeling only increases as I encounter other uglinesses in the world at large: strip malls with their mass-fabricated façades; daytime talk shows with their voyeuristic gossip; relentless visual noise that drains and distracts us; racism; self-indulgent behavior; wastefulness; barely utilitarian church buildings; and "faith" movies that ignore every biblical notion of sanctification.

And the ability to make ugliness abound, whether material or moral, is in us all, sinners great and small. The effect of all this ugliness upon us is no small thing, either. Like a dementor in Harry Potter's Azkaban, it sucks the life out of us. Ugliness makes our souls sick, leaving us dissipated and eventually deformed. Ugliness is one of the three anti-fruits of human rebellion, alongside falsehood and evil.

So what will rescue us from all this ugliness? God, of course. But what about God gives us hope in the midst of so much ugliness? A fundamental attribute of God: that he is beautiful. He is a beauty-full, beauty-making God who invites us to participate in his work of expanding beauty upon the earth.

The Beauty of God

Consider the ordinary dictionary meaning of beauty—"The quality that gives pleasure to the mind or senses and is associated with such properties as harmony of form or color, excellence of artistry, truthfulness, and originality."

Then consider this God.

Our God makes beautiful material stuff. He fashions the carnival-colored, wacky-jumping flat lizard of South Africa and the severe environment of the Gobi desert in Mongolia. He constructs the extravagant diversity of life in the Amazon rainforest. He invents homier things such as the capacity to savor tea and toast.

share this pageshare this page



E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 7 comments.See all comments
Dave T.   Posted: October 07, 2008 9:34 PM
I think it's possible to call beauty "extra-biblical" if you are doing a quick word search study. There are, however, deep strains throughout the Bible, and even in places like Romans 1:20 (...Those things can be seen in what he has made...) there is an understanding that creation offers us glimpses of God's nature. We more often that not call a snowflake or a sunset etc. "beautiful" with the sense of the eternal Artist behind it's existence. We know beauty when we see it, and we can praise God when we come face-to-face with His artistry in the world: in nature, in the Bible & theology, and even the imperfect ideas and creative acts of his broken image-bearers. If we only look to our concordance, we'll miss it.

BJ   Posted: October 07, 2008 1:38 PM
I'm not sure what to make of this article. As a musician and worship leader, I find myself nodding in agreement the whole way through. And yet this concept seems almost extra-biblical. Other than the Psalm 27 verse that the author quotes, you have to use a lot of conjecture to make a biblical case. I took a quick look at all the instances of "beauty" in Scripture (31 in NIV), and more often than not the context described it as deceptive or fleeting. As a previous poster mentioned, Isaiah 53 says that Jesus lacked physical beauty. The only two NT mentions include a blossom's beauty being destroyed and a woman's beauty being spiritual in nature (James 1; 1 Peter 3). I'm not saying our churches should be ugly and devoid of art, but it's hard for me to place a heavy emphasis on beauty when the Bible doesn't seem to do the same.

Dave N.   Posted: October 06, 2008 10:17 PM
The trap, if you will, with the medieval view of beauty equating with good is that our human condition seems drawn toward beauty with negative results. (Genesis 3 is a nice place to begin thinking about this.) Our culture works to create and preserve subjective standards of beauty through desperate and expensive medical means only to find that beauty is still ultimately quite fleeting. (The poor, of course, do not have access to these resources and are often seen as less-than-beautiful in our society for a variety of reasons.) We are told in scripture that God evaluates things and people in ways that are different than our own and so we must be cautious when trying to achieve beauty as some sort of objective standard or an end in itself or to necessarily trust our own subjective evaluation of what constitutes the beautiful. As for Sue above I don't know what the topic of beauty and Sarah Palin have to do with each other (other than maybe she was a beauty queen?) or liquor.

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search






















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com