Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
November 23, 2009
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > 2008 > OctoberChristianity Today, October, 2008  |   |  
THE CHRISTIAN VISION PROJECT
A Holy Longing
Beauty is the hard-to-define essence that draws people to the gospel.




ADVERTISEMENT

Our Creator commissions a multifaceted work of literature: the Bible. In it, we find the comforting poetry of Psalm 23. There is the Apocalypse, teeming with strange symbols that inspire fear and awe. In the Gospels Jesus' parables deploy allusive turns of phrase. There is no sentimentalism in the laments of Jeremiah, no slick or sloppy writing in Paul's letters.

There is also, preeminently, the beauty of God's self-sacrificing love—of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. At the cross the beauty of God is mangled, smelly, dirty, misunderstood, "banged with terror," to quote one modern poet. It makes us weep. And it is good. And how it makes us yearn to be loved and love like such a God.

What we see in this Trinitarian God is his ability to make beauty shine forth from all kinds of lovely and messy, magnificent and broken things—things from which we expect beauty to be absent. The doubt-filled book of Job? That freakish quartet of singing beasts cruising around the eternal throne? These are beautiful? Yes, these things, directed by the hand of God, are beautiful.

I submit, then, that when we present a gospel that ignores or devalues beauty, we not only present a small gospel, but also a distorted gospel, because it misrepresents our God.

The God whom we preach can end up not looking like the Word made radiant flesh, but like the Word who belongs to a Mensa club. He has the answers, all of which are true, but no real presence. He is the Right Idea who looks nothing like the resplendent, technicolor Son of Man—"hair a blizzard of white, voice a cataract, face a perigee sun"—whose beauty captivated the heart of St. John. Likewise, instead of the Good Shepherd whom Mary of Bethany leisurely beheld, we can easily find ourselves following a worker-of-the-month carpenter, a driven good-doer who gets plenty accomplished for the kingdom, but who looks like a far cry from the transfigured Glory whom the early church fathers called the "everlasting desire of nations."

We certainly must continue to declare Jesus as the Good Way and the True Truth. But he is not these alone. Jesus is also a Desirable Beauty, one who attracts us by the beauty of his person and works. And he has placed a deep longing in all humans for beauty. When you and I welcome the in-forming, re-forming presence of beauty into our gospel—our evangelism and social action, our worship and work, our praying and playing—we allow beauty to do something that only it can do: generate longing, a longing that is satisfied supremely in the Source of all created beauties, Jesus Christ. And this is very good news.

To be sure, beauty has its subjective dimension. I like a good mocha coffee. My wife prefers a good black tea. My architect friend Margaret favors the clean lines of modern architecture over the ornate gothic architecture I'll take any day. There are the nonbelievers who fail to see the "beauty" of the crucifixion. In no way, then, can we make simplistic statements about what is beautiful. Still, there are at least three fundamental qualities that suggest the basic nature of beauty. Let me explain.

The Mechanics of Beauty

When we say of something, "That is beautiful," what dynamics are at work? Three interrelated qualities: unity, complexity, and richness, all of which, when working together, evoke longing. Take a Mercedes Benz engine, a fine mechanical work of art.

First, all the parts of a Mercedes engine hold together, are excellently integrated—unified. Nothing is wasted, nothing missing. Second, the engine exhibits a complexity of action. Many things, electrical, chemical, and mechanical, are happening at the same time to produce wondrous functions. And third, the engine provokes, for Benz-lovers at least, poetic outbursts: "What a gorgeous engine! It's perfect!" While philosophers might call this "radiance" or "richness," car enthusiasts would call this ecstasy, for they sense that something "more than" is going on.

share this pageshare this page



E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 7 comments.See all comments
Dave T.   Posted: October 07, 2008 9:34 PM
I think it's possible to call beauty "extra-biblical" if you are doing a quick word search study. There are, however, deep strains throughout the Bible, and even in places like Romans 1:20 (...Those things can be seen in what he has made...) there is an understanding that creation offers us glimpses of God's nature. We more often that not call a snowflake or a sunset etc. "beautiful" with the sense of the eternal Artist behind it's existence. We know beauty when we see it, and we can praise God when we come face-to-face with His artistry in the world: in nature, in the Bible & theology, and even the imperfect ideas and creative acts of his broken image-bearers. If we only look to our concordance, we'll miss it.

BJ   Posted: October 07, 2008 1:38 PM
I'm not sure what to make of this article. As a musician and worship leader, I find myself nodding in agreement the whole way through. And yet this concept seems almost extra-biblical. Other than the Psalm 27 verse that the author quotes, you have to use a lot of conjecture to make a biblical case. I took a quick look at all the instances of "beauty" in Scripture (31 in NIV), and more often than not the context described it as deceptive or fleeting. As a previous poster mentioned, Isaiah 53 says that Jesus lacked physical beauty. The only two NT mentions include a blossom's beauty being destroyed and a woman's beauty being spiritual in nature (James 1; 1 Peter 3). I'm not saying our churches should be ugly and devoid of art, but it's hard for me to place a heavy emphasis on beauty when the Bible doesn't seem to do the same.

Dave N.   Posted: October 06, 2008 10:17 PM
The trap, if you will, with the medieval view of beauty equating with good is that our human condition seems drawn toward beauty with negative results. (Genesis 3 is a nice place to begin thinking about this.) Our culture works to create and preserve subjective standards of beauty through desperate and expensive medical means only to find that beauty is still ultimately quite fleeting. (The poor, of course, do not have access to these resources and are often seen as less-than-beautiful in our society for a variety of reasons.) We are told in scripture that God evaluates things and people in ways that are different than our own and so we must be cautious when trying to achieve beauty as some sort of objective standard or an end in itself or to necessarily trust our own subjective evaluation of what constitutes the beautiful. As for Sue above I don't know what the topic of beauty and Sarah Palin have to do with each other (other than maybe she was a beauty queen?) or liquor.

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search






















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com