Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
February 14, 2012

Home > 2008 > October (Web-only)Christianity Today, October (Web-only), 2008
Better to Gush than Hush
Susan Wise Bauer explains why Americans expect public contrition from leaders who play around in the bedroom.




The Art of the Public Grovel: Sexual Sin & Public Confession in America
by Susan Wise Bauer
Princeton: Princeton University Press, September 2008
352 pp., $26.95

Former presidential candidate John Edwards knows how to make a confession. As the story of his 2006 affair broke, he went on ABC News to answer for his actions. He was contrite, humble, and ready to take full responsibility for his behavior. He had asked God for forgiveness and apologized to the public. Despite his misdeeds, he positioned himself with the righteous as a crusader battling the demons of narcissism. Equally important, he made clear that he had no further aspirations for power. Always the populist, he told reporter Bob Woodruff that he wasn't sure he would ever return to politics. While putting the future of his career into the hands of the people, he left the door open for a rebound.

Edwards's profession meets all of the criteria for a perfect confession, according to Susan Wise Bauer's engaging The Art of the Public Grovel: Sexual Sin and Public Confession in America. Although the Edwards scandal broke after Bauer had finished her book, it provides a fitting epilogue. Bauer is interested in the ways men and women in the national spotlight have dealt with their own sexual sins once those sins go public. She argues that over the last 150 years, the ritual of confession underwent a "massive shift."

"Americans increasingly expected their erring leaders to publicly admit to their sin and to ask for forgiveness," she explains, while leaders engaged in a "ceremonial laying down of power, made so that followers can pick that power up and hand it back." Who did they learn this from? According to Bauer, they learned it from American evangelicals. "Even as evangelicals complained about their diminishing influence in America," she writes, "the evangelical ritual of public confession assumed center stage in secular American culture."

To make these arguments, Bauer takes the reader on a whirlwind tour of the most famous (and often infamous) sex scandals of the late-19th and 20th centuries. By the end of the book, readers are left with a complete scorecard of winners and losers in the ritual of public confession, along with an outline of the Bauer formula for successful groveling.

If her formula was accurate, this book would be a must-read for every minister who lusts in his heart or in a hotel room, every politician who text messages strapping young Congressional pages, and every priest who molests children or covers up another's crimes. But it is not. While there is no doubt that the ritual of public confession has evolved over time and now parallels evangelical models, there is no prescription for success. Bauer's argument required that she read evidence selectively and interpret it based on arbitrary and changing criteria. Like Bill Clinton, she had to play fast and loose with the past.

Bauer's first case study focuses on Grover Cleveland, a winner in Bauer's confession game who was elected President despite having fathered a child with a mistress. Republicans taunted the Democrat during the 1884 election with "Ma, Ma, where's my Pa?" Nevertheless, the scandal had little impact on his career. Bauer argues that he survived for two reasons. First, he was living in an era when confession was still a private matter; second, he reassured voters that he would not take advantage of people's weaknesses, especially when entrusted with the presidency.

But Bauer ignores the even bigger sex scandal of the era, that of Henry Ward Beecher and Elizabeth Tilton. Beecher, the most famous minister in post-Civil War America, had engaged in an affair with Tilton, a married member of his congregation. When she confessed the affair and her feminist friends publicized it, a national scandal broke. Beecher denied everything and was exonerated. He displayed no sense of humility at all, made no confessions, and suffered very little as a result.





Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

wesh

October 27, 2008  12:35pm

Only a couple of the 7 Deadly Sins are relevent in American Churches. To be prideful and hypocritical, it has to be that way. I read somewhere about some guy praying "Thank God I am not like all those dirty, poor, old, illiterate, retarded, promiscuous, ugly, people that call out to you in desparation. Anyone that looks at me can see how holy and rightous I am." By the way, what's "collateral damage?" Must have something to do with the stock market, right? KesW.....Just because you can't say something nice, do you have to tell the truth?

alison

October 25, 2008  4:48pm

Are you suggesting that John Edwards actually repented, confessed, threw himself on the mercy of the listener, you weren't paying attention. That was such a lame attempt at excusing himself that he actually made Bill Clinton look moral. He avoided questions, changed the subject, and, I believe, intentionally chose that particular person for the interview because he thought that with the reporters prior brain injuries he could pull a fast one, which he did. There was no remorse. And it was disgusting how he made sure the viewers understand that he only cheated on his wife while she was in remission. Of course, maybe I read your article wrong and you weren't actually attempting to say that John Edward's apology was genuine. If that's the case, never mind.

TSJ

October 24, 2008  1:50pm

A pretty good article overall, which peaked my interest in the book. I find it interesting that American Christians tend to be so selective in their judgmentalism about these things. With so much rhetoric being tossed around about abortion and gay marriage in this election season, Christians have kept quite mum about John McCain's history as an adulterer. It speaks volumes about the character of American Christians that we are so willing to embrace a candidate who treated his first wife like garbage and discarded her like an old rag, just because he speaks against gays and abortion. When did these become the only two marks of a candidate's character?

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]



Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper

Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Kyria.com
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com