Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
February 10, 2012

Home > 2008 > SeptemberChristianity Today, September, 2008
Choosing Celibacy
How to stop thinking of singleness as a problem.




On an ordinary Tuesday last spring, the Dean of Student Life at an evangelical Christian college in the Midwest said to me, her graduate assistant, "Marcy, the evangelical culture of our campus does a lot to prepare its students for the inevitability of marriage, but we do little to set them up for singleness. We need to do better. You should be the one to speak with them," she decided, "and the title of your talk should be, 'Single by Choice.'"

She was a provocative one, this dean, with sharp instincts. Her title's declaration posed an ultimatum: to reconsider the assumptions about singleness and marriage passed down to us by the lore of our Christian campus, and an ultimatum to me as a representative of the most recent generation of young adults, most of whom, according to U.S. census data, will not marry until we're at least 27. A full one-fifth of us will never marry at all.

There are several reasons for this trend toward prolonged singleness. Sociologists such as Robert Wuthnow and Christian Smith point to a changing job market that requires extended years of education beyond a traditional, four-year bachelor's degree. Many young adults devote their post-college years to volunteer or low-paid service. Few careers available in one's early 20s come vested with the 9-to-5 sturdiness that used to turn one's thoughts to starting a family.

In this climate of enterprise and ambition, few young adults experience singleness as a condition worthy of their attention or concern. When I asked my 28-year-old friend why he never came to any of our church-sponsored events for singles, he replied that he didn't know he was supposed to. In fact, though the church I attend is nestled in a college town and lists over 120 single adults in its directory of 500 members, its singles ministry has folded for lack of interest. Singleness, it seems, is not so much the harbinger of identity for these young adults as it is the default set of tracks for the train of their young adult years.

Yet what changes in the experience of these young adults when they reach their early 30s and are still single? How do they activate their desire to grow up—to commit themselves in love to a person, a place, and a plot—without a wedding planner to script this transformation and a ceremony to declare it? How do they get their community to see them as grownups without a rite of passage akin to marriage? Who are they as adults, if they tarry on as singles—laden with time, money, and experience, but in limbo and alone?

This is the question my supervisor was essentially posing to me, a 35-year-old woman, transitioning from the unmeditated singleness of my 20s to the long-term investment impulses of my 30s. I mulled over her question for six months or more. In an evangelical culture that has tended to view marriage and family as the normative template of adulthood, how would I conceive of my identity as a single?

The answer that has come to hold the most shape for me resides in the purposed way of life evoked by celibacy. I'm not endorsing here a wholesale return to traditional lifelong religious orders, but I think it's time to ask, "Why not?"

Why not call for a vowed, vocational commitment to the church? What would change in our culture of singleness if the church were to reclaim a tradition that reinvokes the memory that we live in the time between the gospel's first announcement and its final fulfillment—a time in which marriage is celebrated, but celibacy is held out as a radical sign of fidelity to Christ and his body?





Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

Displaying 1–5 of 45 comments

Sue

September 25, 2008  2:33am

Brent, I agree. But for many women, it is not a "decision" as more of not getting chosen or being overlooked for more "dangerous" girls or the adultelesence that seems to pervade. As unpopular as this may sound, I am asking our men to step up and realize something (and btw, I'm not talking to men such as you. I applaud you) I think from the articles I have researched and books I have read (and which this article points to as well) is the inability of many men to let go of the "warrior" years that pervades their thinking in our age: marriage is not about how much money you have. It is about growing up and taking on the responsibilities of being an unselfish adult who is available to provide for your wife and family **through** God and not thinking you as a man have to do that all yourself before you ask a sister to get married. I personally know of too many women who have been stood up at the alter most cruelly as well as some who have been left soon after the marriage begun.

Dawn

September 23, 2008  1:35pm

Hip, hip, hooray! I'm married, but I resonate with your call to attention here, Marcy. Marriage and family is no be all, end all, and I'm constantly needing to re-evaluate how to find a balance between family and ministry to the larger world, to ensure that I'm not living the American dream, but clinging to the Kingdom call.

Tiasha

September 22, 2008  1:01pm

Hi Marcy, Great article. In my thoughts the evangelical movement emphasizes marriage to maintain a standard of purity and those who are unable to be celibate should marry as stated in I Corinthians 7. I guess the church is fearful that if they preach singleness or celibacy that many won't take the call seriously and may become immoral. There are singles who want to date and have a boyfriend. Yes, these singles won't have sex but what about other aspects of dating such as kissing, cuddling and intimate kissing moments. There are singles that want to abstain from the opposite sex all together, no dating just completely loving God and committing to a life a of singlesness. I have members of my family that are like this. Singleness is complex and to group the vow of celibacy in it is only one part of it. However, I agree celibacy and singleness should be discussed in church. The vow of celibacy, like marriage is a serious one as stated and may not be right for all singles. God Bless...

Rachel M

September 18, 2008  3:32pm

Marcy, this article succinctly encapsulates such an array of collected material. You are helping shape the practical theology of the evangelical church on what it means to be the _family_ of God. You draw our attention to what really matters - Christ and His Kingdom - so that we can serve Him in the day-to-day with more abandon, regardless of our current marital situation. If God can't use us one way, He'll use us another - all we have to do is jump in! Thank you for speaking this out and modeling it in your community.

Geoff

September 17, 2008  4:48pm

Well, I'm probably "feeding the troll", but since Roberto (and his alter-egos?) want to press the issue, how about this -- Matthew 5:27-28: "You have heard that it was said, 'Do not commit adultery.' But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart." Let's think about this. Jesus is saying that anyone who even LOOKS at a woman lustfully has sinned. You can dance around it and say, "Oh, he's only talking about married people", but that completely misses the point. Jesus understood what the whole Jewish culture understood, namely, that once you have sex with someone, you're considered to be married to them. Sex and marriage were united. So sex "outside of marriage" meant a couple of things: sex with a prostitute, adultery, or sex with someone whom you don't marry. All of those were considered sinful. Charges of misogyny, though correct, also miss the point, because Jesus isn't discussing gender, he's discussing lust.

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]



Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper

Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Kyria.com
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com