Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
November 25, 2009
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > 2008 > SeptemberChristianity Today, September, 2008  |   |  
Choosing Celibacy
How to stop thinking of singleness as a problem.




ADVERTISEMENT

Though some churches may flinch from ordaining a celibate vow, we might still use the word celibacy to rightly honor and rightly name the countercultural life to which singles are called. In doing so, we encourage more than just abstinence from sex. We bless the single vocation. We recall the church's history and remember our true family. We christen singles as called-out ones, with familial gifts that amplify the church and her outward-looking mission.

A return to a culture that welcomes celibacy might happen simply through a rise in the number of Christian singles who display a winsome picture of celibacy's communal appeal. Anyone who has read Donald Miller's spiritual memoir Blue Like Jazz will hear in his narrative of pubs and coffeehouses, college campuses and Volkswagen vans the story of a celibate man who, like Francis of Assisi, is barefoot and mobile to meet the face of Jesus in everyone.

Joining Donald Miller are others like Shane Claiborne, the young man whose Simple Way community in Philadelphia has joined married couples and singles in a community committed to poverty, chastity, and obedience—a pattern first modeled by the early church and later ordered by Saint Benedict.

Singleness is no social anomaly; celibacy shouldn't seem that way to us, either. Postmodern life, Mother Teresa, and the new monastic movement have brought the holy challenge of celibacy before the church.

The church's opportunity in this is simply to name what it sees: an explosion in the number of young adults who are highly educated, creative, entrepreneurial, spiritually intuitive, and apt to invest in a calling that has some roots—like the monastics who illuminated the Book of Kells and effectively saved the transmitted text of Scripture. Or the early church fathers like Athanasius and church mothers like Macrina, theologians like Aquinas, seers like Teresa of Avila, and sages like the desert monastic Synclectica.

"Single" does not do justice to the vital intelligence that spurred these saints to wed their affection to the forward-moving family of the church. "Celibate," on the other hand, is a word that tells me they knew exactly what they were doing. Theirs was a way of life purposely chosen with their community wholly in mind.

We are a community of interpreters, continually mirroring for one another our role in the story of God's kingdom. In restoring the language of celibacy to the lexicon of the church, we'll also restore a tradition that has historically produced much life. More importantly, we'll restore a Christological story of family, in which celibacy is a viable choice, a worthy commitment, and a sacred relationship.

Marcy Hintz is a member of Church of the Resurrection in Glen Ellyn, Illinois, and a recent graduate of the Christian Formation & Ministry Program at Wheaton College Graduate School.



Related Elsewhere:

Earlier Christianity Today articles on similar topics include:

Practicing Chastity | A lifelong spiritual discipline for singles and marrieds. Lauren F. Winner reviews Dawn Eden's The Thrill of the Chaste. (Mar. 15, 2007)
Sex in the Body of Christ | Chastity is a spiritual discipline for the whole church. (May 13, 2005)
30 and Single? It's Your Own Fault | There are more unmarried people in our congregations than ever, and some say that's just sinful. (June 21, 2006)
Solitary Refinement | Evangelical assumptions about singleness still need rethinking (June 11, 2001)
Two Cheers for Celibacy | People who expect a sudden reversal of the century long clerical requirement show an inadequate understanding of why the Vatican is committed to this policy. A Christianity Today editorial (June 10, 2002)
share this pageshare this page



E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 45 comments.See all comments
Sue   Posted: September 25, 2008 2:33 AM
Brent, I agree. But for many women, it is not a "decision" as more of not getting chosen or being overlooked for more "dangerous" girls or the adultelesence that seems to pervade. As unpopular as this may sound, I am asking our men to step up and realize something (and btw, I'm not talking to men such as you. I applaud you) I think from the articles I have researched and books I have read (and which this article points to as well) is the inability of many men to let go of the "warrior" years that pervades their thinking in our age: marriage is not about how much money you have. It is about growing up and taking on the responsibilities of being an unselfish adult who is available to provide for your wife and family **through** God and not thinking you as a man have to do that all yourself before you ask a sister to get married. I personally know of too many women who have been stood up at the alter most cruelly as well as some who have been left soon after the marriage begun.

Dawn   Posted: September 23, 2008 1:35 PM
Hip, hip, hooray! I'm married, but I resonate with your call to attention here, Marcy. Marriage and family is no be all, end all, and I'm constantly needing to re-evaluate how to find a balance between family and ministry to the larger world, to ensure that I'm not living the American dream, but clinging to the Kingdom call.

Tiasha   Posted: September 22, 2008 1:01 PM
Hi Marcy, Great article. In my thoughts the evangelical movement emphasizes marriage to maintain a standard of purity and those who are unable to be celibate should marry as stated in I Corinthians 7. I guess the church is fearful that if they preach singleness or celibacy that many won't take the call seriously and may become immoral. There are singles who want to date and have a boyfriend. Yes, these singles won't have sex but what about other aspects of dating such as kissing, cuddling and intimate kissing moments. There are singles that want to abstain from the opposite sex all together, no dating just completely loving God and committing to a life a of singlesness. I have members of my family that are like this. Singleness is complex and to group the vow of celibacy in it is only one part of it. However, I agree celibacy and singleness should be discussed in church. The vow of celibacy, like marriage is a serious one as stated and may not be right for all singles. God Bless...

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search






















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com