The Soloist

I'll be honest: I had concerns. I signed up to review Joe Wright's third film, The Soloist, last summer. Then the film's late-fall, Oscar-buzz release slot was bumped up into the fallow month of April to allow the studio to focus its award campaigning on other (better?) movies; in the movie biz, we call that a Bad Omen. And then came the trailer, itself loaded with so much sugary sweetness and saccharine sentimentality, the prospect of sitting through the full two-hour movie began to seem nauseating.
I needn't—and shouldn't—have worried. Wright—who previously directed a masterful adaptation of Pride and Prejudice and the bewitching Atonement—has arrived at the point where he can officially be moved out of the Promising Young Filmmakers camp and into the Great Filmmakers camp. Stated simply: The Soloist is a remarkable movie. And the move to April turns out to be a blessing; this is a small, intimate kind of movie that deserves to be cradled and cherished, not slathered in crass award-show buzz and industry politics.

Robert Downey Jr. as Steve Lopez, Jamie Foxx as Nathaniel Ayers
And that sugar-sweet trailer? Well, you can't blame me for being worried. The story seems like a catalyst for pure schmaltz. Robert Downey, Jr. stars as Steve Lopez, a columnist for the Los Angeles Times. Jamie Foxx is Nathaniel Ayers, a homeless, mentally challenged street musician and Julliard dropout. You can fill in the rest—or at least you might think you can: Yes, Steve meets Nathanial. Yes, he becomes quite taken with him, and begins writing columns about his unusual story. Yes, the humble shames the proud, and Lopez finds his life forever changed because of his encounters with Nathaniel.
But not so fast: This isn't that kind of movie. You know, the kind where the central character has some sort of Condition, but, because of his sweet spirit and triumph over adversity, he reveals to those around him the error of their selfish, greedy ways, and their lives are turned topsy-turvy because of this one special guy. But this isn't Forest Gump, and it sure isn't Benjamin Button. This film is full of surprises, and chief among them is this: It has real weight, nuance, and complexity. While it might make you feel good, it's not a Feel-Good Movie—it's a movie with real heft.
And oh yeah: It's true.

Catherine Keener as Mary Weston
Steve Lopez is a real guy who wrote a real book about the real Nathaniel Ayers, and much of the film's success comes from the adaptation by Susannah Grant, whose screenplay never loses sight of the fact that Nathaniel is a character—not a plot device—and that he isn't to be defined by his Condition, but by his personality, his history, his values. He's a regular guy who's fallen on some tough times, and he's just as capable of messing things up and acting like an idiot as anyone else. And that's how Foxx plays him. It's not a flashy, Oscar-bait performance, but a surprisingly understated one; he essentially mumbles his way through most of the movie, but it works.
Wright, on the other hand, is a director who's already made a reputation out of colorful, fast-paced movies that are rich in humor and romance, high in energy and cinematic flair. The Soloist is his first movie that isn't really a period piece, but it is no less transfixing; it's a film borne from a love of words and color and sound, a celebration of the beauty created by the actors and the script, the camera and the music.
The Latest in Movie News, June 17, 2013

It's the Thoughts That Count

Why World Relief's Jenny Yang Feared Speaking on Immigration

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).












Comments
Displaying 13 of 8 comments
See all comments
Ruth
I thought both Foxx and Downey should get Oscars for their performance - especially Downey. My Dad worked with the homeless in Los Angeles for 25 years. Reaching out and helping challenged people is not easy. It is heart breaking work. There are those who don't want to get better. Does that stop us? No, because there is a commandment that says we should care. I thought the movie did a brillant job of telling it like it really is - and what do you know, it is a true story!!
Pal
Just saw it, and it has become one of my favorite movies of all time. It is Jesus in the inner city. It is compassionate and transformational. It takes religion out of religion, and replaces it with reality and relationship - what true relationship is. If the Body of Christ adapted this attitude toward the least and the lost there would be no more least and lost.
KD
I loved the story, but it dragged in places. Also, I had a very hard time hearing the words over the music at times, not just Nathaniel's, but Steve's,too, which was frustrating. My husband had the same problem--we felt like we were missing a fair amount of dialogue. I liked that the movie was so realistic, that they showed a side of life that I didn't know about---a city of homeless people, not just a few here and there, but hordes of them. I've spent a fair amount of time with a homeless person who is a paranoid schizophrenic, and I didn't try to change her. That was way, way beyond me. I was just her friend, pitching in where she would let me meet a need here and there. I liked that there wasn't a terrifically happy, sappy ending--that is what made it believable for me.