Power Pentecostalisms
French historian Jean-Pierre Bastian has concluded that the new Pentecostalisms are a "religious mutation" founded on emotionalism and a "popular religion that restructures the symbolic universe of the poor in terms of survival." These religious expressions are in continuity with "the Latin American cultural and religious universe and have replaced historical Protestantism." For this and other reasons, Bastian believes that the neo-Pentecostalisms could be classified as indigenous (and Catholic) Latin American popular religions. For Bastian, that explains in part why these churches grow so quickly.
In addition to its faulty theology, Latin American evangelicalism challenges our optimism with its notorious sectarianism. It is not only diverse, it is divisive. A large percentage of Latin American churches of all sizes are products of church splits. In Medellín, Colombia, where I live, close to half of the non-Catholic churches, and all the largest churches in the city, are the result of church splits.
The fragmentation of Latin American Protestantism, says Freston, makes it impossible for it to be a force for democracy.
Degree Fever
Finally, Latin American institutions that somehow grant the highest academic degrees in theological education have proliferated. More than 60 percent of our pastors have no theological education. When they join a church's staff, they often go on to get degrees from institutions that they themselves started.
These schools often operate below international standards of higher education. People can get "doctoral" degrees without an accredited master's degree or a research library. Since seminaries usually aren't accredited, they aren't regulated. Each denomination and megachurch wants to have its own seminary or Bible institute and grant academic degrees with just a few books.
There are also evening and online institutions based either in Latin America or in the United States that offer all sorts of degrees. Institutions that do comply with international standards struggle to survive because their degrees are more rigorous and therefore cost more and take longer. We end up in "the perverse circle of mediocrity," says Lausanne International Deputy Director for Latin America and seminary founder Norberto Saracco.
Wherever it exists, Christianity will always have a cultural component. There will always be a need to adjust the relationship between theology and experience. However, it is very dangerous to affirm that all who call themselves Christians are Christians—no matter what they do with Scripture, what theology they hold, or how they live. Christianity cannot be interpreted only through cultural anthropology or ethnographic lenses.
A sound church should aspire to be evangelical, biblical, and historical—and there are such churches in Latin America. Not all evangelical churches here have the problems I've outlined. But enough of them do that I am deeply concerned. This brief perspective shows that the task of evangelization is never fully accomplished.
We need a new generation of Latin American (and Asian and African) theologians who know the Scriptures and how to interpret them in order to avoid the theological anarchy—both indigenous and imported—that reigns in our midst.
Sometimes preachers of false doctrine turn around and look to the true message of the gospel. A fellow theologian told me about a Guatemalan preacher who, after 20 years, became interested in the Reformation. He began to study, and his message changed completely. But another theologian asked me whether we can really afford to wait decades for our leaders to preach the gospel.
Star Trek Into Darkness

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).












Comments
Displaying 13 of 45 comments
See all comments
kpembrook
Perhaps Jesus analysis about the importance of scripture applies here. He told the Pharisees that "Ye do err, knowing neither the scriptures nor the power of God". Once again, we have folk taking apart what God intended to be together -- both Word and Spirit. Biblical knowledge or theological erudition is good but not enough. Practical pentecostal power is also good but not enough. When will both sides recognize the logs in their own eyes before attempting mote surgery on the other? It's not either/or, it needs to be both/and. We must know BOTH the scriptures AND the power of God. For too long we have pulled into our various camps defending our version of "truth" and missing the reality in front of our eyes. May God grant us the vision of a truly full gospel -- one that embraces sound teaching, has a grasp of the working of God in history & culture, manifests pentecostal power, adn exists as a community that doesn't depend on worldly paradigms of money and power.
John Holecek
The author states: "We need a new generation of Latin American (and Asian and African) theologians who know the Scriptures and how to interpret them in order to avoid the theological anarchy—both indigenous and imported—that reigns in our midst." Sorry, theological anarchy also exists in the northern hemisphere, with well educated pastors preaching all manner of things and denominational theology all over the map. This is the fruit of the reformation: church splits, proliferating denominations, and no coherent theology. Quite honestly, Protestantism was dead on arrival, with it's intrinsic logic working itself out in ever more destructive ways.
Joe Pentecostal
Surprise, surprise. The author did not bother to interview one Latin American Pentecostal theologian even though they are quite numerous and well published. Christianity Today wreaks of Reformed (I mean Evangelical) rationalist bias all the way down the line. Mentioning the solas without even bothering to contextualize them as though there was some common agreement even in the first decade of the Reformation. Don't you recall Luther and Zwingli fighting it out over the interpretation of scripture with Luther suggesting that Zwingli's death was the judgment of God? Don't you remember the Reformed and Lutherans going at each other with Reformed folks even to this day talking about a "second" Reformation in Heidelberg by which they mean away from Lutheranism? Talk about disconnected from history. Do you honestly think you can offer an ahistorical read of the solas and in the next breath blame Pentecostalism for being ahistorical? Sheer blindness.