Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
February 12, 2012

Home > 2009 > DecemberChristianity Today, December, 2009
BOOKS
Indelible Marker
John Wigger explains how Francis Asbury left his fingerprints all over American Christianity.




Flash back to 1776 and consider the celebrities of the time: George Washington, and maybe Thomas Jefferson. Believe it or not, the horseback-riding preacher and leader of early Methodism, Francis Asbury, would have been more recognizable face to face than these leaders or anyone else of his generation. Chris Armstrong, associate professor of church history at Bethel Seminary, interviewed historian John Wigger about the imprint Asbury left on America, which Wigger details in American Saint: Francis Asbury and the Methodists (Oxford University Press).

What did Francis Asbury do that American Christians today should appreciate?

Asbury led American Methodism through a period of tremendous growth. From 1771 until his death in 1816, he traveled more extensively across the American landscape than probably any other American of his day: over 130,000 miles on horseback. He preached more than 10,000 sermons and probably ordained 2,000 to 3,000 preachers. In 1771, there were only a few hundred Methodists in America. By 1816, there were more than 200,000, and Methodism had become the largest and most dynamic religious movement in America—a status it would hold through the Civil War.

Asbury's influence also went well beyond denominational borders. Many more Americans attended Methodist meetings than actually joined the church, especially early on. Methodism's theology, worship style, and system of discipline worked their ways deep into the fabric of American life, influencing nearly all other mass religious movements. So Asbury's fingerprints have ended up on the holiness and Pentecostal movements and on the culture of evangelicalism as a whole.

You use the contentious s-word in describing Asbury. What was really saintly about him?

Asbury didn't think of himself as particularly holy. But other people did. Living the same life as Methodism's circuit riders, he spent most days in other people's homes during his 45 years in America. He lived under intense scrutiny, and in the end people had very little bad to say about him.

He prayed frequently, getting up at 4 or 5 A.M. many mornings for private prayer, and then joining with his host families for evening prayer. He lived in voluntary poverty, dressing cheaply, even buying the cheapest saddles despite the huge amount of time he spent on horseback. He gave away almost all the money that ever came his way. He relentlessly pushed himself in the service of the gospel, even in his later years when he suffered progressively worsening congestive heart failure, which made his feet so sore he sometimes had to be carried from his horse to the pulpit.

No one believed that Asbury was perfect, and even his greatest supporters admitted that he made mistakes in running the church. Though not an autocrat, he did guard his episcopal authority, which opened him up to criticism. He was so well loved that we know of at least 1,000 children named after him. But he continued to be afraid of rejection. So when he was in settings he found intimidating, he could seem aloof, even harsh.

What made Asbury such an effective leader?

When we think of great religious leaders, we usually have in mind intellectuals, charismatic communicators, autocrats. But Asbury was none of these. He was the son of an English gardener, and had only a few years of common schooling to his credit. He was a terrible public speaker. And he was uncomfortable in the halls of denominational power.

Asbury's leadership was built on his piety and his ability to connect with people one on one. He was also a brilliant administrator. His nationwide network of thousands of leaders and the structure of "conferences" churning out statistical reports anticipated modern managerial structures.





Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

Displaying 1–5 of 7 comments

Dan

December 30, 2009  8:37pm

@JG: Thanks for the report on WBS. But I'm not likely to return to seminary (too old now!). I'm just trying to figure out how to make it to retirement (10 years and counting!). However, my 25 year-old son wants to go and I'm encouraged to find out that WBS has remained faithful to God's word. I will pass along your recommendation as he does not want to go to a seminary that is not conservative.

John H. Guthrie

December 30, 2009  7:51pm

Dan, it was my impression that you were refering to all Wesleyans so I'm glad you corrected me on that point. Your seminary experience tallys with what I have heard of Wesleyan seminaries which were once Evangelical. One person told me that more and more Wesleyan seminaries no longer hold to the divine authorship of Genesis and that some in the Old Testament departments believe the first actual person mentioned in the Bible who actually existed was Solomon. If you ever thought of attending seminary again, I bring to your attention Wesley Biblical Seminary in Jackson, MS, where such views of scripture you encountered were not promoted. The professors not only teach scriptural holiness, but they live it out in front of their students. I attended it for four years, graduating in 2004. Even though the church I attended prior to attending seminary was Wesleyan in tradition, I never fully understood sanctification until I attended WBS. www.wbs.edu (check the link to Hour of Holiness)

Dan

December 30, 2009  2:20pm

@JG: "If todays Wesleyans have a low view of scripture, so do most Christians in the U.S., including those who attend Calvinist Churches..." True, no doubt. I'm not a Calvinist. My experience is in the Wesleyan tradition. I attended the Nazarene Theological Seminary in the early '80's and in every class in my first and only semester there, the profs ridiculed the traditional conservative evangelical verbal plenary view of scripture. They promoted the dynamic inspiration theory - which is okay. But what really bothered me was the way they disagreed - through ridicule and sometimes deception. They stated often from the lectern that if you believed the traditional view you obviously believed in the mechanical dictation theory. I found this condescending, arrogant, and deceptive. (The verbal plenary view of inspiration is not the same as the mechanical dictation theory.) Not at all what you'd expect from "holiness" folks. Otherwise, they were fine folks.

John H. Guthrie

December 30, 2009  12:02pm

When ever zeal for holiness wanes, each branch of God's Church fails God in its most distinctive ways. When holiness wanes in Wesleyan/Methodist circles, there is a focus on man centered good works; when Calvinists stray, they tend toward a preoccupation with theological distinctives without love or good works, sacramentalists focus on the ceremony without worshipping the true God that the ceremony was intended to worship. Yes, the Wesleyan world in this nation is low in spirituality at present, but so are all branches of the church, Calvinist and sacramental as well. If todays Wesleyans have a low view of scripture, so do most Christians in the U.S., including those who attend Calvinist Churches. Wesleyan theology, if properly studied, has a high view of scripture that would expand God's kingdom if practiced. Those overseas churhes with roots in the Wesleyan movement are making disciples everyday. It was that movement that has done more to reach the world for the Gospel.

Jason

December 30, 2009  1:52am

American Christianity was unfortunately led off on a wild goose chase by John Nelson Darby (1800-82) amongst others. This 'father of modern American dispensationalism' promoted the idea that the conversion of the terrible Edomites 'who became Jews' (Josephus Antiquities of the Jews, XIII ix 1; XV vii 9) about 120BC, and who Ezekiel predicted would take possession of the land and heritage of Israel and Judah (Ezekiel 35:10, 11, 15; 36:2, 5), should be ignored, as should the additional conversion of the Turkish Khazars (c.740AD) who were the primary ancestors of the Ashkenazi or Eastern European Jews who make up the overwhelming majority of today's Jews. Instead these violently racist anti-Christian Talmudists have been worshiped by influential evangelical leaders such as Pat Robertson, Tim Lahaye, John Hagee and Jerry Falwell etc and permitted to take over the US mainstream media and bring about the recent catastrophic wars. An additional, growing problem is 'designer churchianity'.

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]



Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper

Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Kyria.com
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com