Jump directly to the content

Interview

books

BooksReviews, Interviews, News, Commentaries, Excerpts, My Top 5 Books, Wilson's Bookmarks, Book Awards

Indelible Marker

John Wigger explains how Francis Asbury left his fingerprints all over American Christianity.

Flash back to 1776 and consider the celebrities of the time: George Washington, and maybe Thomas Jefferson. Believe it or not, the horseback-riding preacher and leader of early Methodism, Francis Asbury, would have been more recognizable face to face than these leaders or anyone else of his generation. Chris Armstrong, associate professor of church history at Bethel Seminary, interviewed historian John Wigger about the imprint Asbury left on America, which Wigger details in American Saint: Francis Asbury and the Methodists (Oxford University Press).

What did Francis Asbury do that American Christians today should appreciate?

Asbury led American Methodism through a period of tremendous growth. From 1771 until his death in 1816, he traveled more extensively across the American landscape than probably any other American of his day: over 130,000 miles on horseback. He preached more than 10,000 sermons and probably ordained 2,000 to 3,000 preachers. In 1771, there were only a few hundred Methodists in America. By 1816, there were more than 200,000, and Methodism had become the largest and most dynamic religious movement in America—a status it would hold through the Civil War.

Asbury's influence also went well beyond denominational borders. Many more Americans attended Methodist meetings than actually joined the church, especially early on. Methodism's theology, worship style, and system of discipline worked their ways deep into the fabric of American life, influencing nearly all other mass religious movements. So Asbury's fingerprints have ended up on the holiness and Pentecostal movements and on the culture of evangelicalism as a whole.

You use the contentious s-word in describing Asbury. What was really saintly about him?

Asbury didn't think of himself as particularly holy. But other people did. Living the same life as Methodism's circuit riders, he spent most days in other people's homes during his 45 years in America. He lived under intense scrutiny, and in the end people had very little bad to say about him.

He prayed frequently, getting up at 4 or 5 A.M. many mornings for private prayer, and then joining with his host families for evening prayer. He lived in voluntary poverty, dressing cheaply, even buying the cheapest saddles despite the huge amount of time he spent on horseback. He gave away almost all the money that ever came his way. He relentlessly pushed himself in the service of the gospel, even in his later years when he suffered progressively worsening congestive heart failure, which made his feet so sore he sometimes had to be carried from his horse to the pulpit.

No one believed that Asbury was perfect, and even his greatest supporters admitted that he made mistakes in running the church. Though not an autocrat, he did guard his episcopal authority, which opened him up to criticism. He was so well loved that we know of at least 1,000 children named after him. But he continued to be afraid of rejection. So when he was in settings he found intimidating, he could seem aloof, even harsh.

What made Asbury such an effective leader?

When we think of great religious leaders, we usually have in mind intellectuals, charismatic communicators, autocrats. But Asbury was none of these. He was the son of an English gardener, and had only a few years of common schooling to his credit. He was a terrible public speaker. And he was uncomfortable in the halls of denominational power.

Asbury's leadership was built on his piety and his ability to connect with people one on one. He was also a brilliant administrator. His nationwide network of thousands of leaders and the structure of "conferences" churning out statistical reports anticipated modern managerial structures.


From Issue:
December 2009, Vol. 53, No. 12
More from Christianity Today
Divine Rehab

Divine Rehab

Whatever your addiction, God's grace is the only hope for a way out.
Star Trek Into Darkness

Star Trek Into Darkness

Lots of explosions but not much heart makes this a film that will please most but might leave fans disappointed.
Forgiving Iran

Forgiving Iran

Long before I knew the true God, he helped me release my hatred.
Get Instant Access
Christianity Today Magazine
Subscribe now for a year (10 issues) at $24.95 for print, iPad, and instant web access.

International Orders

Comments

Displaying 1–3 of 7 comments

Dan

December 30, 2009  8:37pm

@JG: Thanks for the report on WBS. But I'm not likely to return to seminary (too old now!). I'm just trying to figure out how to make it to retirement (10 years and counting!). However, my 25 year-old son wants to go and I'm encouraged to find out that WBS has remained faithful to God's word. I will pass along your recommendation as he does not want to go to a seminary that is not conservative.

John H. Guthrie

December 30, 2009  7:51pm

Dan, it was my impression that you were refering to all Wesleyans so I'm glad you corrected me on that point. Your seminary experience tallys with what I have heard of Wesleyan seminaries which were once Evangelical. One person told me that more and more Wesleyan seminaries no longer hold to the divine authorship of Genesis and that some in the Old Testament departments believe the first actual person mentioned in the Bible who actually existed was Solomon. If you ever thought of attending seminary again, I bring to your attention Wesley Biblical Seminary in Jackson, MS, where such views of scripture you encountered were not promoted. The professors not only teach scriptural holiness, but they live it out in front of their students. I attended it for four years, graduating in 2004. Even though the church I attended prior to attending seminary was Wesleyan in tradition, I never fully understood sanctification until I attended WBS. www.wbs.edu (check the link to Hour of Holiness)

Dan

December 30, 2009  2:20pm

@JG: "If todays Wesleyans have a low view of scripture, so do most Christians in the U.S., including those who attend Calvinist Churches..." True, no doubt. I'm not a Calvinist. My experience is in the Wesleyan tradition. I attended the Nazarene Theological Seminary in the early '80's and in every class in my first and only semester there, the profs ridiculed the traditional conservative evangelical verbal plenary view of scripture. They promoted the dynamic inspiration theory - which is okay. But what really bothered me was the way they disagreed - through ridicule and sometimes deception. They stated often from the lectern that if you believed the traditional view you obviously believed in the mechanical dictation theory. I found this condescending, arrogant, and deceptive. (The verbal plenary view of inspiration is not the same as the mechanical dictation theory.) Not at all what you'd expect from "holiness" folks. Otherwise, they were fine folks.

See All 7 Comments
You must be a Christianity Today subscriber to post comments
(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).
Login
or
Subscribe
or
Register

Don't Miss

Forgiving Iran

Forgiving Iran

Long before I knew the true God, he helped me release my hatred.
A Man Without Breath

A Man Without Breath

Generation Whine

Generation Whine

Embedded reporting from the Millennial front.

more | current issue

Books & Culture

A Measure of Forgiveness

A Measure of Forgiveness

Memories of a British...

Today's Christian Woman

Amy Grant: How Mercy Looks from Here

Amy Grant: How Mercy Looks from Here

The Queen of Christian...

Small Groups

Mental Illness Is Mainstream

Mental Illness Is Mainstream

We must help the one...

Facebook

CT eBooks & Bible Studies


Shopping