Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
November 23, 2009
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > 2009 > MayChristianity Today, May, 2009  |   |  
Augustine's Origin of Species
How the great theologian might weigh in on the Darwin debate.




ADVERTISEMENT

Augustine was deeply concerned that biblical interpreters might get locked into reading the Bible according to the scientific assumptions of the age. This, of course, happened during the Copernican controversies of the late 16th century. Traditional biblical interpretation held that the sun revolved around the earth. The church interpreted a challenge to this erroneous idea as a challenge to the authority of the Bible. It was not, of course. It was a challenge to one specific interpretation of the Bible—an interpretation, as it happened, in urgent need of review.

Augustine anticipated this point a millennium earlier. Certain biblical passages, he insisted, are genuinely open to diverse interpretations and must not be wedded to prevailing scientific theories. Otherwise, the Bible becomes the prisoner of what was once believed to be scientifically true: "In matters that are so obscure and far beyond our vision, we find in Holy Scripture passages which can be interpreted in very different ways without prejudice to the faith we have received. In such cases, we should not rush in headlong and so firmly take our stand on one side that, if further progress in the search for truth justly undermines our position, we too fall with it."

No Compromise

Augustine's approach allowed theology to avoid becoming trapped in a prescientific worldview, and helped him not to compromise in the face of cultural pressures, which were significant. For example, many contemporary thinkers regarded the Christian view of creation ex nihilo as utter nonsense. Claudius Galenus (a.d. 129–200), physician to the Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius, dismissed it as a logical and metaphysical absurdity.

Augustine also argues that Scripture teaches that time is also part of the created order, that God created space and time together. For some, however, the idea of time as a created thing seemed ridiculous. Again, Augustine counters that the biblical narrative is not open to alternative interpretations. Time must therefore be thought of as one of God's creatures and servants. For Augustine, time itself is an element of the created order. Timelessness, on the other hand, is the essential feature of eternity.

So what was God doing before he created the universe? Augustine undermines the question by pointing out that God did not bring creation into being at a certain definite moment in time, because time did not exist prior to creation. For Augustine, eternity is a realm without space or time. Interestingly, this is precisely the state of existence many scientists posit existed before the big bang.

Now, Augustine may be wrong in asserting that Scripture clearly teaches that the Creation was instantaneous. Evangelicals, after all, believe in the infallibility of Scripture, not the infallibility of its interpreters. As others have pointed out, Augustine himself was not entirely consistent about the Creation. Other options certainly exist—most notably, the familiar idea that the six days of Creation represent six periods of 24 hours, or the related idea that they represent six more extended periods, possibly millions of years. Nevertheless, Augustine's position ought to make us reflect on these questions, even if some of us believe him to be incorrect.

share this pageshare this page



E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 69 comments.See all comments
sfg   Posted: May 21, 2009 4:51 PM
Prof McGrath, I feel the need to point out that your use of the word 'random' as a 'lawless process' is very different from the very specific definition of the word that scientists use. In science and specifically in my field of statistics, random is defined as a "circumstance or event that is described by a probability distribution (American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition). A probability distribution describes the range of possible outcomes that a circumstance or event can attain and the probability that a any given outcome or subset of outcomes will occur. So in the scientific sense an event that is random is unpredictable (as you assert yourself), but if it's probability distribution is known, it's possible to quantify the amount of unpredictability. Surely with your background in molecular biophysics you were taught this. Why do you feel the need to play with semantics regarding the word 'random'?

Rocket   Posted: May 20, 2009 6:57 AM
A sensible and fine article. The prophecy of Augustine that believers will be regarded with scorn by intelligent non believers if they insist on an overly 'literal' interpretation of Genesis, HAS ALREADY COME TRUE. The propaganda of so so called "Creationists" has, in my country (Australia) led to a common and widespread justification of unbelief. Students refuse to consider the claims of Christ on their lives, not because they cannot believe in a Creator, but because they think that in becoming a believer they have also to become a mindless 'creationist'. So they justify their unbelief, using a false theory of creation. The Church should be firmer on this issue and clearly identify Creationism as a heresy. Firstly, because it deliberately misinterprets the beginning of Genesis as prose not poetry (as the author intended), and, secondly because it ignores the vast scientific evidence that Creation itself has always been creative itself. To be blunt: Creationists are Flatearthers.

Redfox   Posted: May 19, 2009 9:46 AM
A reality that must be faced – if Christianity cannot co-exist with science Christianity will disappear. No dark threats warning against the shaky ground of compromise, no amount of fervourant hope, no thundering from the pulpit and no amount of self-delusion will protect Christianity from extinction. Only a clear understanding that the bible is not a scientific text book written to explain ‘how things work’, and rather that the bible is a record of man’s attempts to understand and meet God (and the reverse) will achieve this. If we seek to uphold the bible by defending every ‘jot and tittle’ we will fail to defend the whole also. I cannot get beyond the first few chapters of Genesis without realizing that a literal meaning is not intended, I am surprised that many Christians do not see the ambiguity, and more amazingly call those who do not agree ‘atheist’. Believing in Jesus Christ as savior does not require a complete understanding of the relationship between the bible and science.

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search






















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com