Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
February 10, 2010
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > 2009 > MayChristianity Today, May, 2009  |   |  
Augustine's Origin of Species
How the great theologian might weigh in on the Darwin debate.




ADVERTISEMENT
Ongoing Creation

So what are the implications of this ancient Christian interpretation of Genesis for the Darwin celebrations? First, Augustine does not limit God's creative action to the primordial act of origination. God is, he insists, still working within the world, directing its continuing development and unfolding its potential. There are two "moments" in the Creation: a primary act of origination, and a continuing process of providential guidance. Creation is thus not a completed past event. God is working even now, in the present, Augustine writes, sustaining and directing the unfolding of the "generations that he laid up in creation when it was first established."

This twofold focus on the Creation allows us to read Genesis in a way that affirms that God created everything from nothing, in an instant. However, it also helps us affirm that the universe has been created with a capacity to develop, under God's sovereign guidance. Thus, the primordial state of creation does not correspond to what we presently observe. For Augustine, God created a universe that was deliberately designed to develop and evolve. The blueprint for that evolution is not arbitrary, but is programmed into the very fabric of creation. God's providence superintends the continuing unfolding of the created order.

Earlier Christian writers noted how the first Genesis Creation narrative speaks of the earth and the waters "bringing forth" living creatures. They concluded that this pointed to God's endowing the natural order with a capacity to generate living things. Augustine takes this idea further: God created the world complete with a series of dormant powers, which were actualized at appropriate moments through divine providence.

Augustine argues that Genesis 1:12 implies that the earth received the power or capacity to produce things by itself: "Scripture has stated that the earth brought forth the crops and the trees causally, in the sense that it received the power of bringing them forth."

Where some might think of the Creation as God's insertion of new kinds of plants and animals readymade into an already existing world, Augustine rejects this as inconsistent with the overall witness of Scripture. Rather, God must be thought of as creating in that very first moment the potencies for all the kinds of living things to come later, including humanity.

This means that the first Creation account describes the instantaneous bringing into existence of primal matter, including causal resources for further development. The second account explores how these causal possibilities emerged and developed from the earth. Taken together, the two Genesis Creation accounts declare that God made the world instantaneously, while envisaging that the various kinds of living things would make their appearance gradually over time—as they were meant to by their Creator.

The image of the "seed" implies that the original Creation contained within it the potential for all the living kinds to subsequently emerge. This does not mean that God created the world incomplete or imperfect, in that "what God originally established in causes, he subsequently fulfilled in effects." This process of development, Augustine declares, is governed by fundamental laws, which reflect the will of their Creator: "God has established fixed laws governing the production of kinds and qualities of beings, and bringing them out of concealment into full view."

share this pageshare this page



E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 69 comments.See all comments
sfg   Posted: May 21, 2009 4:51 PM
Prof McGrath, I feel the need to point out that your use of the word 'random' as a 'lawless process' is very different from the very specific definition of the word that scientists use. In science and specifically in my field of statistics, random is defined as a "circumstance or event that is described by a probability distribution (American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition). A probability distribution describes the range of possible outcomes that a circumstance or event can attain and the probability that a any given outcome or subset of outcomes will occur. So in the scientific sense an event that is random is unpredictable (as you assert yourself), but if it's probability distribution is known, it's possible to quantify the amount of unpredictability. Surely with your background in molecular biophysics you were taught this. Why do you feel the need to play with semantics regarding the word 'random'?

Rocket   Posted: May 20, 2009 6:57 AM
A sensible and fine article. The prophecy of Augustine that believers will be regarded with scorn by intelligent non believers if they insist on an overly 'literal' interpretation of Genesis, HAS ALREADY COME TRUE. The propaganda of so so called "Creationists" has, in my country (Australia) led to a common and widespread justification of unbelief. Students refuse to consider the claims of Christ on their lives, not because they cannot believe in a Creator, but because they think that in becoming a believer they have also to become a mindless 'creationist'. So they justify their unbelief, using a false theory of creation. The Church should be firmer on this issue and clearly identify Creationism as a heresy. Firstly, because it deliberately misinterprets the beginning of Genesis as prose not poetry (as the author intended), and, secondly because it ignores the vast scientific evidence that Creation itself has always been creative itself. To be blunt: Creationists are Flatearthers.

Redfox   Posted: May 19, 2009 9:46 AM
A reality that must be faced – if Christianity cannot co-exist with science Christianity will disappear. No dark threats warning against the shaky ground of compromise, no amount of fervourant hope, no thundering from the pulpit and no amount of self-delusion will protect Christianity from extinction. Only a clear understanding that the bible is not a scientific text book written to explain ‘how things work’, and rather that the bible is a record of man’s attempts to understand and meet God (and the reverse) will achieve this. If we seek to uphold the bible by defending every ‘jot and tittle’ we will fail to defend the whole also. I cannot get beyond the first few chapters of Genesis without realizing that a literal meaning is not intended, I am surprised that many Christians do not see the ambiguity, and more amazingly call those who do not agree ‘atheist’. Believing in Jesus Christ as savior does not require a complete understanding of the relationship between the bible and science.

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search






















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com