How the ELCA Left the Great Tradition for Liberal Protestantism
During last week's biennial Church Wide Assembly of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA), the church affirmed major policy recommendations to allow for the blessing of same-sex unions (which practice will soon inflate to same-sex marriage) and the rostering of gay and lesbian pastors in partnered relationships.
Earlier in the week it also passed by one vote—out of over 1,000 total votes cast—a Social Statement on Sexuality that admitted there was no consensus on the moral evaluation of homosexual conduct, and offered no compelling biblical or theological reasons to support the policies it later in fact adopted. The Statement was firm and bold on issues that everyone agreed upon—the moral condemnation of promiscuity, pornography, sexual exploitation, etc.—but indecisive and vague about contested issues—co-habitation, premarital sex, the importance of the nuclear family, and, of course, homosexual conduct.
Right before the vote on the Social Statement a totally unexpected tornado hit the Minneapolis Conference Center where we were meeting as well as the huge Central Lutheran Church next door, knocking the cross off one of its towers. Orthodox voting members saw the work of God in the tornado's cross-toppling effects and in the vote that passed with a .666 majority. Revisionists noted that the sun came out after the vote. In response the orthodox quipped that the sun comes out almost every day, but rogue tornados are pretty rare!
Those in the orthodox camp warned the assembly not to vote on binding church doctrine, especially if it had no convincing biblical or theological arguments to overturn the moral consensus of the one holy, catholic, and apostolic church held throughout the ages and by 99 percent of the world's Christians. Such action would identify the ELCA with a rapidly declining liberal Protestantism while departing from orthodox teaching and practice. Strong arguments against the Social Statement and policy recommendations were made by pastors and laypersons—bishops were for the most part silent—to no avail. The church left the Great Tradition of moral teaching to identify with the United Church of Christ and the Episcopal Church.
How did this come to be? On the one hand, the fact that the largest American Lutheran church body had become the first confessional church to accept homosexual conduct was a traumatic shock to many. There was much anger and anguish. On the other hand, the decision was not at all unexpected by those of us who have fought against the underlying currents operating in the ELCA from its very inception. The fight has been long yet predictable. Liberal Protestantism was the ELCA's destination. Indeed, its presiding Bishop, Mark Hanson, is fast becoming the charismatic leader of liberal Protestantism.
"There is nothing but the social gospel," shouted a voting member at the assembly. But that is certainly not Lutheran doctrine. The various programs of social change taken to heart by the church are human works in God's left-hand reign, having to do with the Law, not the gospel. Rather, the real gospel is clear: the grace of God in Jesus Christ is offered to repentant sinners condemned by the Law and then called to amendment of life by the Spirit. Liberating efforts in the realm of social and political change are possibly effects of the gospel, but certainly not the gospel itself.
But the ELCA has accepted the social gospel as its working theology, even though its constitution has a marvelous statement of the classic gospel. The liberating movements fueled by militant feminism, multiculturalism, anti-racism, anti-heterosexism, anti-imperialism, and now ecologism have been moved to the center while the classic gospel and its missional imperatives have been pushed to the periphery.

A Fractured and Beautiful Faith
Streaming This Weekend, May 24, 2013

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).













Comments
Displaying 13 of 123 comments
See all comments
Alan Johnson
Congratulations to the Lutherans for getting it right. "Do not call anything impure that God has made clean." Acts 11:9 is not the expresion of Christians digging their heals into the sand and being stubborn. It's the open-hearted invitation for the arms of the gospel to embrace those very ones who were once seen as outside the circle of grace. If the gospel isn't for gay and intersexual people, then who is it for? Is it any big wonder why Philip would be sent supernaturally to the Ethiopean Eunoch to share the full embrace of the New Covenent (after having been rejected by the Old). The good news is that the gospel honors both the heterosexual model while refusing to be heterosexist and inflexible. The bottom line is covenant fidelity between the two parties (whatever configuration) that God has joined together. The ultimate Trinitarian model is, after all, homo-ousian...not hetero-ousian according to the church fathers.
Michael Dooley
The leadership with in ELCA often speak of the importance of becoming a "mainline" denomination. Many of us wonder why one would want to be. "Mainline" is declining both in numbers and influence. The recent desions cut ministies to minorities off at the knees. Given that the ELCA wants to be more "inclusive" (more people of color in its membership), this leads to the suspection that, in fact, the leadership doesn't have much use for people much different than themselves. That is, as long as a person of color agrees with them, he/she is welcome. But don't expect us to change to be more sensitive to you. Orthodox Lutherans have never aimed to be "mainline" because it is beside what is really important. Science, culture, "enlightened" views, traditions, and personal experiences are not equal with Scripture. We insist on fidelity to the Holy Scriptures, the Confessions, and the three ecumenical creeds of the Christian Church. Proclaimation of Christ is the Church's true mission.
David Hardy
Shannon Posted: Research has proven that there is a genetic component to homosexuality as well ( I disagree.. Once upon a time, the sexualities—heterosexual, homosexual, even bisexual—were categorical and mutually exclusive. Further, sexual attraction/desire, sexual behavior and sexual identity were assumed to be congruent: same-gender sexual attraction/behavior presupposed a gay or lesbian or bisexual identity, and other-gender sexual attraction/behavior assumed heterosexuality. But results of sexuality research over the last 20 years have turned our paradigm of sexuality on its head.... The truth is, sexuality can be fluid, varying across time and situation. http://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/sexual-fluidity/