Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
May 26, 2012

Home > 2010 > AprilChristianity Today, April, 2010
Book Review
Talk, Research, Marry
What Elizabeth Gilbert discovered about marriage before she ate her words in Committed.




Committed: A Skeptic Makes Peace with Marriage
by Elizabeth Gilbert
Viking Adult, January 2010
304 pp., $12.00


When Eat, Pray, Love, Elizabeth Gilbert's self-absorbed and often humorous memoir, hit bookshelves in 2006, many readers devoured her tale of nasty divorce, exotic travels, new romance, and search for spiritual meaning. The book spent 57 weeks at number one on the New York Times bestseller list, and you couldn't hop on an airplane or sit in a coffee shop without seeing a copy in someone's hands. A film, starring Julia Roberts, is on the way. By the closing pages of the book, Gilbert had found a new man to love and a sense of the transcendent. She swore, however, that she would never remarry.

Like all of us who swear that we will never do something—and then sheepishly retract it—Gilbert has lived to eat her words. In her second and more pragmatic memoir, Committed: A Skeptic Makes Peace with Marriage (Viking) [4 stars], Gilbert bumps up against the harsh reality of American visas. If she wants her expatriate Brazilian gem trader, "Felipe" (the name he is given in the book), to continue living with her in the United States, marriage is her only option.

As Gilbert tells it, tying the knot again is a difficult decision. After six years of marriage, her divorce had left her with little taste for wedlock and plenty of fear about trying it again. Felipe, 17 years her senior, is also the survivor of an unpleasant divorce. Together, "we'd been so badly gutted by our experiences that the very idea of legal marriage—with anyone, even with such nice people as each other—filled us with a heavy sense of dread," she writes.

Gilbert talks with friends, family, and individuals from all over the world about marriage, seemingly to bolster her confidence and dispel her fears. These discussions form the backbone of the book. What Gilbert discovers is that marriage means different things to different people and in different cultures: emotionally, socially, historically, and religiously. People also bring contrasting expectations to matrimony. Her idea of marital bliss, she discovers, might not be someone else's.

She talks to Hmong women in a Vietnamese village who, she writes, do not put marriage at the center of their "emotional biography." In contrast, she notes, in the industrialized West the person whom you choose to marry is perhaps the single most vivid representation of your own personality.

Closer to home, she reflects on a discussion with a Mr. Webster, a Connecticut dairy farmer whose marriage seemed solely commonsensical ("Arthur was soon going to be taking over the family farm and therefore he needed a wife"). Did that mean pragmatism negated love? Well, maybe not, as Mr. Webster cared for his wife at home for almost a decade after she was diagnosed with Alzheimer's, she observes.

From conversations like these, Gilbert draws conclusions. "What Mr. Webster and the Hmong people perhaps have in common is a notion that the emotional place where a marriage begins is not nearly as important as the emotional place where a marriage finds itself toward the end, after many years of partnership." Moreover, she says, they would likely agree that there isn't one person who will make your life magically complete but that there are a number of people with whom you could seal a respectful bond. "Then you could live and work alongside that person for years," Gilbert writes, "with the hope that tenderness and affection would be the gradual outcome of your union."





Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

Displaying 1–5 of 9 comments

Clinton

February 21, 2010  3:02pm

Absolute rubbish! Another example of anti-Christian bias and the suggestion that Christians don't understand marriage. I wonder if Gilbert has any references for her view that the Church didn't consider marriage holy or sanctified for 10 centuries...especially considering the fact that the historic Catholic and Orthodox Churches have always considered marriage a sacrament. She only betrays her ignorance of Christian theology - marriage and all other relationships are temporal in light of one's relationship to Christ. That's what Paul is saying and what Jesus Himself meant. However, marriage itself is "holy" because it signifies and incarnates Christ's relationship with the Church. Gilbert's research seems flimsy and its sad that people like her have an impact on an America increasingly theologically-illiterate and unChristian.

muse

February 10, 2010  10:23am

I am appreciative of the fact that the writer cited two problematic areas for Christians, but didn't go into great detail. We're not such idiots that we have to have everything explained for us.

Arusha

February 10, 2010  9:06am

I agree with the two comments above. Far too many Christians sweep thier fundamental beliefs under the carpet as though these views are right. (many are based in New Age Philosophy) which slam dunks the Cross of Christ and true Grace. We must continue to study the scriptures, pray and seek to have the True(biblical) Jesus here. thanks

Steve Skeete

February 10, 2010  8:02am

I must agree with Ted Hewlett that the reviewer was rather cavalier in dealing with two very significant issues the author raised, the one relative to christianity not seeing marriage as holy or sanctified for approximately ten centuries, that is 50% of its existence to date, and the other the author's take on homosexual marriage. In fact, the reviewer seems to be just reporting the facts of the book without bothering to voice any contrary opinion at all. This leaves the review sounding more like a commercial for a book he genuinely admires. Such nonchalance is merely additional evidence of how secular culture is not only "dumbing" but numbing the church into a docile acquiesence.

Ted Hewlett

February 09, 2010  11:33pm

This review is remarkable for what it does not remark on: for example, the statement, "For approximately ten centuries, Christianity itself did not see marriage as being either holy or sanctified . . . ." Surely a review in a Christian publication should pose some challenge to that remark, in view of the New Testament's comparison of marriage with the union between Christ and his church, and indeed the ideal sanctification of all legitimate human relationships. Nor is her approval of same-sex "marriage" commented on, an omission that leads the reader to assume that her having this view is not something objectionable, or at least something relatively unimportant (a view that is gaining surprising acceptance among the smart set of the Evangelical world.

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]



War and Peace

War and Peace

Pastor Tullian Tchividjian survived a leadership coup by finding rest in the liberating power of the gospel.

Facing Fears

Facing Fears

Max Lucado employs preaching to overcome fear.

more | current issue

Christian Bible Studies

Unbalanced Blessings

Unbalanced Blessings

The balancing act of...

Books & Culture

Quiet

Quiet

Shhh! Introverts working...

Preaching Today

NFL Star Junior Seau Searched for Peace

Small Groups

Prepare with Prayer

Prepare with Prayer

Don't leave out this...

Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper