Clash of the Titans

As a film critic, I'm a strong believer in divorcing one's opinion of a movie from that of the source material. The film in question needs to stand on its own merits, period.
So when I declare this remake of Clash of the Titans to be flat-out awful, it's not because I have great affection for the 1981 original. That film remains (for me) a wonderful depiction of classic Greek mythology in all its heroic romanticism, complete with a rousing score and imaginative visual effects by stop-motion pioneer Ray Harryhausen (Jason and the Argonauts, The 7th Voyage of Sinbad).
Even so, the original has its flaws. It's corny, most of the performances are too melodramatic, and Harryhausen's effects were out of date thirty years ago. But the movie was a hit for its time and gained a devoted following through video rentals and cable broadcasts. A newer, big-budget remake could truly improve it, even if the new film deviates from the original story, which wasn't particularly true to Greek mythology to begin with. But what the Titans don't deserve is an overhaul as butchered and brainless as this.

Sam Worthington as Perseus
The computer-generated visuals are as good as you would expect—and the only reason for 1½ stars. As a child, I was intimidated by the giant scorpions, unfazed by the giant (almost cute) Kraken, and terrified by Medusa. Now, thanks to modern technology, the scorpions are vicious, the Kraken is truly monstrous, and Medusa is even more horrific than before. (Still, it's unnecessary to see this movie in 3-D. Unlike Avatar, purposefully filmed in 3-D, Clash was converted after being completed in 2-D; I was underwhelmed by the "extra dimension.")
But the CGI extravaganza can't overcome all the other flaws: sloppy exposition, terrible dialogue, heavy-handed acting, and not a single likable character in the bunch.
Both films follow the adventures of Perseus, a poor fisherman, born of a woman, yet also the son of Zeus, creator of mankind and leader of the Greek gods. (Christ-like parallels? Discuss below!) And both stories involve the hero encountering a series of monsters, each more horrible than the last, all in effort to retrieve the grotesque head of Medusa, the one thing that can stop the Kraken stone cold in its tracks before the sea monster devours Princess Andromeda or her hometown.

Liam Neeson as Zeus
But that's about all the two films have in common. Gone are the benevolent gods who show some regard for man, and the humans who revere their gods. Forget the romantic prince-rescues-princess plotline that drove the original movie (and myth).
Instead, Perseus (Sam Worthington of Avatar and Terminator: Salvation) is a man driven by his anger at the gods. After all, it was Hades (Ralph Fiennes, Voldemore in the Harry Potter films) who casually killed his family at sea while fishing too close to a battle. And didn't Zeus (Liam Neeson) let it all happen?
The odd thing about this new Clash is that everyone is angry at the gods—which the trailers made evident with their declaration of "Damn the Gods." Perseus's father bemoans the poor fishing season shortly before his tragic death. Others make casual reference to their unjust authority, longing for the day when man will finally rise up against their "tyrannical rule." There's otherwise not much evidence to support the Greeks' widespread disenchantment with their religion.

Grieving with the Good Friday God
La complejidad hispana: Todo cambió en el 2012

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).













Comments
Displaying 13 of 14 comments
See all comments
Kevin Willman
I watched this movie last night and found myself doing laundry right in the middle of it. What a yawn. One thing that particularly peeved me was that it was so hard to tell who was who.. In the original it was easy and I was only about 8 years old. Who in the hell were those sand people anyway? The Medusa scene was ok but not close to the original. Not worth the $3.50 rental fee.
ian morris
you are all brain dead if you think this movie was great. it was intertaining but the story was really bad, the original story was much better. there were a few story flaws for instance. how did madusa turn the craken into stone after we were told that only men and not women would turn into stone, what about that desert thing she tried to turn into stone and couldn't. the croken is the exception? there was no romance, no passion, the original story was better.your like for this movie shows your age, i bet you think power rangers and transformers was great too right?
Andy Duncan
Parallels cannot be made between Zeus and God, Hades and the Devil, or Perseus and Jesus Christ. Zeus is a rapist who kills people on a whim, Hades is a perfectly normal god, he just drew the short stick, and Perseus, well he kills more people than he saves if you wish to read the true mythology