SoulWork
How to Become a Successful Religion
To: James, President of the Jerusalem Council
Re: Initial Impressions
Shalom Marketing Ltd. was recently contacted by a member of your council, asking us to tell you about our services. He said to make it clear that he was footing the bill for this initial evaluation, with the hopes that our sound advice will encourage the council to hire us to guide your marketing efforts for the next strategic stage in your movement's life.
We have heard reports of your movement for some time now—who hasn't?—and our initial impressions are very positive! You seem to have dynamic leadership, organizational flexibility, and a natural touch with the people. Add some sophisticated marketing—well, who knows how successful you can become! Naturally, this brief memo will, by its nature, point out areas in need of attention, but make no mistake: We have great optimism about what we call your "effectiveness potential."
Let's begin with one of your leading PR men, Peter, who is clearly a gifted communicator. We believe he would find that our seminar "Winning Techniques for Effective Communication" would help him be more effective still! Unfortunately, he has the regular habit of berating his audience, just at the moment when he has them eating out of his hand.
For example, after that day when everyone thought you all were having one giant party in the middle of the day (by the way, that was a stroke of marketing genius, to show everyone that you all know how to have a good time), Peter gave what frankly was a long-winded speech (we'd recommend no more than five minutes in the future), rehearsing a great deal of history (we'd recommend sticking with the present; nobody cares about the past anymore), and then ended on a couple of awkward notes.
First, he made a point of emphasizing the death of your movement's founder, reminding one and all of recent bloody events. This, of course, casts a rather negative spell on the moment, as people were reminded of something unpleasant. Instead he should be spending a lot more time on your founder's so-called resurrection. We do not, as a matter of policy, judge the veracity of any group's religious claims, but we certainly recognize the resurrection's marketing appeal. It appears to be core to your business, so we would certainly encourage you to exploit its potential.
The other uncomfortable note was when Peter added insult to injury, blaming the crowd for killing your founder: "This Jesus … you crucified." And then he implies that the crowd is full of "lawless men." And if they didn't get the point, he drove home this indelicate point at the end of the sermon: "Let all the house of Israel [now equated with lawlessness] therefore know for certain that God has made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom you crucified."
We understand that Peter would have likely still been grieving over the death of the founder, but insulting your audience is not the way to win friends to the movement. :-)
Granted, a reported 3,000 people were added to your movement that day, which only speaks of Peter's incredible PR gifts. For if he could convince so many to sign up after this presentation, how many more could he have gotten had he been using the tools of "Winning Techniques for Effective Communication"?
Unfortunately, Peter did the same thing after that extraordinary incident with the lame man. More history, more death, and more insults, ending with, "But you denied the Holy and Righteous One, and asked for a murderer to be granted to you, and you killed the Author of life … ."
SoulWork
In "SoulWork," Mark Galli brings news, Christian theology, and spiritual direction together to explore what it means to be formed spiritually in the image of Jesus Christ.
- Christian Athletes Are Not Role Models
- On the Death—and Life—of Innocent Children
- Closer than Ever to the Breath of God
- Making Non-Sense of the Colorado Shootings
- Mastering the Golf Swing of Life
Streaming This Weekend, May 24, 2013
Boy Scouts' Membership Change May Grow Christian Youth Clubs

You Can't Think Your Way to God
Building Peace in the Heart of Darkness

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).











Comments
Displaying 13 of 21 comments
See all comments
Christian Ken
JD, I know what you mean, and I fully understand that the missionaries and Christians have to use the term "Follower of Jesus" in the countries that Christianity is prohibited (I personally know them). Yet that doesn't mean Christian should do the same thing in US! Mark's concern is more about an unhealthy trend that many believers, especially the young or the “cosmopolitan”, being so much influenced by the PC driven media message, attempt to re-brand themselves in order to make them more “acceptable" to the cultural elite (like Anne Rice)--it will GUARANTEE FAIL. The issue of the church is nothing about the brand, but about our lives and depth of faith. The solution is not using the brand “Follower of Jesus’, but living up as an Evangelical Christian is the only way to restore our trust from the public. Mark, you did a great job, article like this one is needed more than ever.
J D
For those who have no idea what it's like to work in an overseas mission field where "Christians" in the West (specifically in the USA) are perceived as immoral hypocrites who don't walk the talk, I would like to clarify that the term "followers of Jesus" is NOT an attempt to be "cool." When American "Christians" are seen promoting war or flocking to movies that glorify sex and violence, is is very challenging for American missionaries to establish a credible witness, because they are associated with a group that seems to have nothing in common with the early followers of Jesus (oops, I used that phrase again - shame on me!). In the U.S., the divorce rate among "Christians" is just as high, if not higher, than the divorce rate among non-Christians, with many professing "Christians" shacking up. This is why many overseas missionaries prefer the term "followers of Jesus" - because the "Christians" are failing to live up to the name they claim.
John Corcoran
After the much criticised last article I hope your readers will realise how fortunate they are to have you as editor.