Scott Pilgrim vs. the World

Let's start with this: Technically, Scott Pilgrim vs. the World is not an indie movie. I mean, not really. When I think of a truly independent film, I think of a motley crew of actors and filmmakers armed with their own cameras, a budget of virtually nothing, and a strong DIY aesthetic. And by those standards, Scott Pilgrim just doesn't fit the bill. It's a big-budget movie, relatively speaking, with visual effects that qualify as truly cutting-edge. In Michael Cera and Jason Schwartzman, it has at least two familiar actors. It has the backing of a studio. It's no Avatar, but it's no home movie, either.
I say all this because the film will likely be classified as an "indie comedy," but let's be more precise: Scott Pilgrim is more like an action-packed comedy that celebrates—and at times sends up—a particularly indie culture. It's fueled by punk rock and a love of classic Nintendo; its visual vocabulary is part manga, part Mario Brothers. Its quirky, sweetly awkward central love story feels cut from the same cloth as Juno, while its genre-bending sci-fi slant feels akin to Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. Its action scenes are spectacular, and it's the funniest picture I've seen all year.

Michael Cera as Scott Pilgrim
So, what is it, exactly? It's hard to put into just a few words, except to say that it's an unmitigated joy and an absolute blast. So let's start with its origins. Scott Pilgrim vs. the World is based on a graphic novel by Bryan Lee O'Malley; his work fused a love of anime and manga with a particularly indie aesthetic and a sense of humor that managed to be sweet and irreverent at the same time.
The movie could be described in much the same way: In fact, director Edgar Wright—a cult favorite for films such as Hot Fuzz and Shaun of the Dead—has made what might be one of the most lovingly accurate graphic novel adaptations of all time, a movie that is clearly enamored and respectful to both the particulars and the spirit of its source material. It's a movie that's utterly enthralled with its own comic book origins, in a way that no movie this side of American Splendor has been—and it shows in every frame, as Wright brings bright colors and goofy humor to a production that splices animation and video game graphics into every single live-action frame.

Mary Elizabeth Winstead as Ramona
And in that sense, I'd almost call it this year's Speed Racer. I'm in the minority of those who happen to think Speed Racer was an unmitigated masterpiece of sheer creativity and joy—a movie where the style is the substance, a movie that's just about being a movie, a movie that never asks to be taken for anything but face value. Scott Pilgrim is in the same boat. Some might see it as some great hipster parable, a postmodern epic for the Nintendo generation; personally, I think it's simply a triumph of dizzying cinematic style for its own sake, and as such, it never misses a beat or hits a false note.
And yet, there's more to it than the pretty pictures and the geeky humor. This is a movie with heart. So what's it about? Scott Pilgrim (Michael Cera, playing a punk rock/action hero version of his Junocharacter) plays bass for an up-and-coming garage band. He has a gay roommate (Kieran Culkin, delightfully deadpan). He's dating a high school girl named Knives (Ellen Wong, wonderfully enthusiastic and sweet). He falls for another girl, a mysterious stranger who literally skates through his dreams (Ramona, played by Mary Elizabeth Winstead, channeling the Kate Winslet of Eternal Sunshine right down to the striking blue hair). So, it's out with Knives, in with Ramona—except, in order to date her, Scott finds that, for reasons never made entirely clear (but who cares?), he must defeat each of her seven evil exes in battle. The seventh ex happens to be Gideon (Jason Schwartzman in his juiciest role yet), a record label guru whose Battle of the Bands contest Scott's trio is trying to conquer.

A Fractured and Beautiful Faith
Streaming This Weekend, May 24, 2013

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).













Comments
Displaying 13 of 16 comments
See all comments
R D
Wow! I came to this article because I was shocked CT had given a movie like this a positive review. I am very pleasantly surprised. I am not a Christian and I have to confess had lumped CT in with all the religious fanatics in this country. But this a reasonable, intelligent, respectable review. I had no idea you guys were so down to earth. The discussion questions at the end are a nice touch. I feel a bit silly for having such a negative view you you guys prior to this. (+5 points for not really knocking homosexuality. Although I think the idea that some movies 'glorify' homosexuality is just plain silly. What does that even mean?)
James Joyce
'There are also references made to homosexuality throughout the film, generally for somewhat comedic effect; the movie doesn't praise homosexuality so much as it simply portrays it as a common thing in our culture. ' The film reviews on this website are generally second-to-none in terms of writing style, readability and insight. Why in tarnation would you go and ruin it by implying that any movie that 'praises' or, I assume, 'accepts' homosexuality as being entirely o.k is a bad thing? Nor does exploring ones sexuality. Undoubtedly you are entitled to opinions and your faith, but to exhibit subtle homophobia and reticence about sex - which is a real issue that holds universal fascination - is backwards and offensive. I know this is a christian website but that doesn't entitle y'all to bigotry
Pierce Oka
@NT CNS ratings, even Os, do not carry with them any kind of binding force, ie, it is a sin to watch such and such movie. Also, because different reviewers view different films, the O rating is given out rather inconsistently. Example: The Matrix received an O, while the other two Matrix movies received A-IV, despite The Matrix Reloaded containing more objectionable content than the first one. The CNS reviewer of Scott Pilgrim, I believe, failed to see the difference between endorsement/promotion of homosexuality and the portrayal of it as something common in the real world(which, sadly, it is) which can be played for laughs. After all, we don't criticize Looney Tunes for "featuring subplots that portray animals brutally killing each other as a perfectly acceptable "given" of modern life." Note also that Talladega Nights contains far more homosexual humour and content, yet received only an A-IV, and was less entertaining than Scott Pilgrim.