Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
March 22, 2010
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > 2010 > January (Web-Only)Christianity Today, January (Web-Only), 2010  |   |  
Political Advocacy Tracker
The State of the Union is Frustrating
The President's first State of the Union address disappointed some conservative advocacy groups who hoped he would strike a bipartisan tone.



ADVERTISEMENT

Political Advocacy Tracker is a roundup of what Christian activist organizations have been talking about over the last week.

Right Thumb Down

Conservative advocacy groups criticized President Obama's State of the Union address for shirking responsibility and placing blame for the country's current situation on former President Bush.

Obama's speech was "one of the worst State of the Union addresses in modern times," said former Bush aide Peter Wehner, senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

"The speech was defensive and petulant," Wehner wrote. "What was on display last night was a man of unsurpassed self-righteousness engaged in constant self-justification."

Tasha Easterling of the American Family Association and Janice Crouse, senior fellow at the Beverly LaHaye Institute, wrote that Obama's speech shifted blame to the previous President rather than taking responsibility, and contained few concrete goals for the future.

Crouse argued that the speech was unbelievable from a woman's perspective.

"Most women listen carefully when a man dishes out flowery promises," she said. "Most have learned from bitter experience not to fall for vague promises. Instead, they look for the particulars, and most importantly, they look at a man's actions."

Pat Robertson and Andrea Lafferty of the Traditional Values Coalition agreed that the President's words were empty.

"What the President said is just more of the same. It's just a lot of talk,"Robertson said on Thursday's 700 Club. "He was young and inexperienced and it shows."

Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council was particularly concerned with Obama's call for an increase in the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit and for the end of the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy, calling them moves "to socialize child care, sexualize the military, and penalize married couples through a government takeover of the U.S. health care system."

Connie Mackey of Family Research Council Action said there was little the President could have said to make up for a year of efforts "to shove socialism down the collective American throat all in his first year of his presidency." Mackey found the speech unnerving: "He never fails to send a shiver down my back with his boldfaced ability to stretch the truth, shall we say? Where was Joe Wilson when we needed him this year?"

Moving Forward on Health Care

Not all advocacy groups took issue with the State of the Union, though. Jim Wallis, president of Sojourners, agreed with the President's focus on job creation and called for a continued push for health care reform.

Wallis, along with several other evangelicals, even signed a Faith in Public Life letter asking the President to press forward with health care reform. Other signatories included author and speaker Tony Campolo, pastor Joel Hunter, pastor Brian McLaren, and Ron Sider, president of Evangelicals for Social Action.

"Lawmakers are closer than ever before to passing this critically needed legislation. Letting this life-line lapse for so many Americans now would be a failure of historic proportions," the letter reads. "We will keep focused on helping the vulnerable until this job is done; we will support you and all our political leaders who will finish what you have started."

Jay Sekulow of the American Center for Law and Justice strongly disagreed with the call for a health care emphasis. He said that the President ignored the fact that most Americans disapprove of the current bill; they want reform, but with minimal government involvement.

share this pageshare this page



E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 46 comments.See all comments
John   Posted: February 03, 2010 10:56 AM
You forgot to let us know what the Institute of Religion & Democracy, Douglas Coe, and "The Family" thought about Obama's speech.

Val   Posted: February 02, 2010 4:09 PM
I am deeply saddened by some of the reviewer's responses. As Christians, I believe we should love and respectfully disagree with each other if needed. I am a conservative, but I love and value my Christian friends who are liberals. I really honor their desire to help the poor. I think it is hurtful though when I am labeled as uncompassionate and selfish because I am not a democrat. I too desire to help those who are poor and oppressed. I am in school to become a counselor. However, I simply have a different philosophical approach to how we should help.

Jerry   Posted: February 02, 2010 1:23 PM
As an Evangelical, I am so appalled by the double-standards of the Christian Right. For years, Christian pro-family groups have continually lobbied Washington for more relief for families with children, and then when our current president does just that by calling for an increase in the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit, it gets criticized by Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council as a move "to socialize child care." It's obvious that no matter what a Democrat President does, it is wrong. The partisanship of the Christian Right so obvious. Their inconsistency (and hypocrisy) was further highlighted last week when they celebrated the election of the pro-choice Scott Brown to the U.S. Senate. It's obvious that the Christian Right is simply a wing of the Republican Party and nothing more and nothing less.

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search






















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com