Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
February 3, 2012
Free Newsletters:

Home > 2010 > JulyChristianity Today, July, 2010  |   |  
Cover Story
Abba Changes Everything
Why every Christian is called to rescue orphans.




ADVERTISEMENT

The creepiest sound I have ever heard was nothing at all. My wife, Maria, and I stood in the hallway of an orphanage somewhere in the former Soviet Union, on the first of two trips required for our petition to adopt. Orphanage staff led us down a hallway to greet the two 1-year-olds we hoped would become our sons. The horror wasn't the squalor and the stench, although we at times stifled the urge to vomit and weep. The horror was the quiet of it all. The place was more silent than a funeral home by night.

I stopped and pulled on Maria's elbow. "Why is it so quiet? The place is filled with babies." Both of us compared the stillness with the buzz and punctuated squeals that came from our church nursery back home. Here, if we listened carefully enough, we could hear babies rocking themselves back and forth, the crib slats gently bumping against the walls. These children did not cry, because infants eventually learn to stop crying if no one ever responds to their calls for food, for comfort, for love. No one ever responded to these children. So they stopped.

The silence continued as we entered the boys' room. Little Sergei (now Timothy) smiled at us, dancing up and down while holding the side of his crib. Little Maxim (now Benjamin) stood straight at attention, regal and czar-like. But neither boy made a sound. We read them books filled with words they couldn't understand, about saying goodnight to the moon and cows jumping over the same. But there were no cries, no squeals, no groans. Every day we left at the appointed time in the same way we had entered: in silence.

On the last day of the trip, Maria and I arrived at the moment we had dreaded since the minute we received our adoption referral. We had to tell the boys goodbye, as by law we had to return to the United States and wait for the legal paperwork to be completed before returning to pick them up for good. After hugging and kissing them, we walked out into the quiet hallway as Maria shook with tears.

And that's when we heard the scream.

Little Maxim fell back in his crib and let out a guttural yell. It seemed he knew, maybe for the first time, that he would be heard. On some primal level, he knew he had a father and mother now. I will never forget how the hairs on my arms stood up as I heard the yell. I was struck, maybe for the first time, by the force of the Abba cry passages in the New Testament, ones I had memorized in Vacation Bible School. And I was surprised by how little I had gotten it until now.

Gospel and Mission

When someone learns that I'm going to speak at their church about adoption, typically the first question is, "So will you be talking about the doctrine of adoption or, you know, real adoption?" That's a hard question, because I cannot address one without addressing the other. We cannot master one aspect and then move to the other, from the vertical aspect of adoption to the horizontal aspect, or vice versa.

Families, the Bible tells us, reflect something eternally true about God. It is God's fatherhood after which every family in heaven and on earth is named (Eph. 3:14-15). We know what human parenting should look like based on our Father's behavior toward us.

The reverse is also true. We see something of God's fatherhood in our relationship with our human fathers. Jesus tells us that our fathers' provision and discipline show us God's active love toward us (Matt. 7:9-11; Heb. 12:5-17).

The same principle is at work in adoption. Adoption is, on one hand, gospel. Our identity and inheritance are grounded in our adoption in Christ. Adoption is also mission. In this, our adoption spurs us to join Christ in advocating for the poor, the marginalized, the abandoned, and the fatherless. Without the theological aspect, the growing Christian emphasis on orphan care too often seems like one more cause wristband for compassionate conservative evangelicals to wear until the trend dies down. Without the missional aspect, the doctrine of adoption too easily becomes mere metaphor, just another way to say "saved."



E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!
[Reader Reviews]

Average User Rating:

Displaying 1–3 of 39 comments

Leonard Nolt

July 16, 2010  8:19am

I found this article interesting and worthwhile but also missing an important ingredient. In addition to caring for orphans, Christians should alse be working at keeping children from becoming orphans in the first place. Probably more children become orphans as a result of military violence than for any other reason. The tendency of the US government to start wars in places like Afghanistan and Iraq, often with the support of US Christians, results in the wholesale destruction of families. Every Afghan or Iraqi killed or injured in these wars was/is a family member and each injury and death represents a family damaged or destroyed by US military violence. In warfare children are often left without a parent to care for them. As long as US Christians support US wars we are probably doing more to create orphans than to care for them. Sincerely; Leonard Nolt LeonardNolt@AOL.com

Leonard Nolt

July 16, 2010  8:17am

I found this article interesting and worthwhile but also missing an important ingredient. In addition to caring for orphans, Christians should alse be working at keeping children from becoming orphans in the first place. Probably more children become orphans as a result of military violence than for any other reason. The tendency of the US government to start wars in places like Afghanistan and Iraq, often with the support of US Christians, results in the wholesale destruction of families. Every Afghan or Iraqi killed or injured in these wars was/is a family member and each injury and death represents a family damaged or destroyed by US military violence. In warfare children are often left without a parent to care for them. As long as US Christians support US wars we are probably doing more to create orphans than to care for them. Sincerely; Leonard Nolt LeonardNolt@AOL.com

Leslie Starasta

July 10, 2010  3:29pm

Thank you for this excellent article. However, I would love to see more articles in CT on in-country orphan care, also known as community-based care which is the standard best practice in orphan care, to help more families stay in-tact rather than feel that as a single-parent in a developing country they are unable to care for their children.

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search
















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!












Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Kyria.com
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com